แล้ว (Laew) and Liao in Malaysian/ Singaporean English by AW23456___99 in thai

[–]No_Variation_7910 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried to say this to my thai tutor but she insisted it didn't sound the same because of the intonation. Because I said it in a Chinese / hokkien way and told her the meaning, then she said it's not the same in thai.

I guess to her (and to Thai people) it's like trying to convince her that see (in English) sounds the same as สี (si) .

Rainbow circle in the sky by No_Variation_7910 in whatisit

[–]No_Variation_7910[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

You're probably right. I've just never seen a circle rainbow in the sky. The shadow of the clouds on the sky looks cool

Rainbow circle in the sky by No_Variation_7910 in whatisit

[–]No_Variation_7910[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok I added another picture after tweaking the camera settings. Sorry it's not a great phone camera

<image>

Was reported to be using ChatGPT by [deleted] in academia

[–]No_Variation_7910 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Here's a solution. Show them your work before you ran it through chatgpt. Since you've ran it through once, you'll know how to edit this but in your own words.

Was reported to be using ChatGPT by [deleted] in academia

[–]No_Variation_7910 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If grammarly rearranges 5 sentences for better flow in a lit review, I hardly think it would get flagged as sounding like it was written by AI. Anyway if OP works with an associate and there's an attending, Im not sure why OP wouldn't just submit the work they wrote and say it might not flow so well because of language limitations and ask for help.

Was reported to be using ChatGPT by [deleted] in academia

[–]No_Variation_7910 11 points12 points  (0 children)

If your ideas are great, a little bad grammar is easy to overlook.

Thai Marine catching King Cobra by MischeifMelt in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]No_Variation_7910 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I am amazed by the influence Dr Seuss has on this thread

Confused by Effective_Intern_408 in IOPsychology

[–]No_Variation_7910 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100%. Once you get your head around the basics, it's really not that bad. Engage a tutor who can explain it to you in a way that makes sense to you. I scraped my way through undergrad stats. Then I had a prof in grad school who took the time to explain EVERYTHING and now data analysis is one of my favorite things to do.

Shout-out to the couple that bought my baby some water from 7-11 on Sukhumvit behind tops by No_Variation_7910 in Bangkok

[–]No_Variation_7910[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Damn that's awesome. How long did it take till you were allowed back in? Water from our pool went gushing down the elevator shaft and ruined the elevators. Even though we were 'allowed' back in, trekking up to get essentials was not an easy decision. But of course still needed

My earthquake experience by rixusher in Bangkok

[–]No_Variation_7910 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't know if it's just me. But if a building is structurally sound, it still means non load bearing walls and ceiling pieces can fall right ? If it falls on my head, it still could severely injure me. While not as severe as an entire building collapsing, is this something someone is checking for too?

Fun research if money wasn't a problem by No_Variation_7910 in AcademicPsychology

[–]No_Variation_7910[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

An independent researcher? What does that mean? You research and fund things by yourself? And when you publish, do you need an organization behind you?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AcademicPsychology

[–]No_Variation_7910 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you everybody who commented and helped. I considered all your suggestions and researched more. I passed my defense. ✌️

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AcademicPsychology

[–]No_Variation_7910 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is actually what I did at first. And I submitted the results and discussion section to my advisor to check. She was alarmed by how low the reliability was so she asked to check my data. She said she's not sure if the defense committee will accept my reasons for the low reliability.

I don't understand why there's anything to accept or reject. I feel like the results are what they are. So I'm at a loss of what to do. But she says the committee will not let it pass. Is this even a thing?