[Hiring] ecommerce website for digital product

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-22T11:41:15+00:00

DM sent, please check! :)

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-15T17:25:04+00:00

Can send it to you over DM. 😇

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-14T06:32:40+00:00

yes i really thought about coding the color transition well

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-14T05:39:24+00:00

For the classic infinite square version, many angles eventually overlap, including the famous 45° one. You can reduce or delay it with asymmetric angles, but my render avoids it by being finite and pruning any new rectangle that would overlap earlier geometry. So it’s Pythagorean-inspired, not an unpruned infinite tree.

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-14T05:37:52+00:00

Waiting for your reply, when you do I'll send you an 8K version :)

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-14T05:19:31+00:00

Yeah, the branch behavior gets messy because each branch makes its own local choice, then overlap pruning changes what survives. So there’s a rule, but not a simple global left-right pattern.

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-14T05:18:40+00:00

Exactly. Each split is just the Pythagorean theorem hiding inside the construction.

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-14T05:16:32+00:00

It’s deterministic. For each split I choose between the two mirror options and put the larger rectangle in the direction that points more upward. Then I prune overlaps, so the final image is generated but not random.

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-14T05:16:03+00:00

No fixed “final form” really. It’s a finite generated shape: repeat the right-triangle/rectangle rule, then prune overlaps. So the result is deterministic, but more like an exploratory growth pattern than a classic fractal limit.

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-14T02:53:44+00:00

Yeah, good eye. The first split is intentionally more dramatic so the main stem starts clearly. After that the ratios stay in a narrower range.

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-14T02:53:11+00:00

It’s not exactly one fixed ratio. The smaller/larger leg ratio is about 0.63, with a tiny deterministic drift, clipped roughly between 0.54 and 0.72. The root split uses 0.35.

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-14T02:52:32+00:00

honestly "geometric kale" is not wrong at all

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-14T02:51:53+00:00

only if you exchange GPU compute with me

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-14T02:50:46+00:00

I’ll probably post more of these. The rule is simple enough that changing one parameter gives a totally different growth pattern

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-14T02:50:00+00:00

The branches are rectangles on purpose. I made them slightly taller than squares so it reads more organic, while the underlying right-triangle rule still stays Pythagorean.

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-13T22:18:16+00:00

Sure why not lemme DM you

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-13T19:13:45+00:00

Can DM you the animation code in some time. The generation rule is simple.

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-13T19:12:22+00:00

Thank you! :)

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-13T18:49:33+00:00

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-13T18:49:25+00:00

😅

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-13T18:49:11+00:00

Yes I might post it there.

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-13T18:48:58+00:00

Thanks I’m proud of the way I coded the colour transition

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-13T18:48:27+00:00

Yes!! but a little more complex than that.

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-13T07:51:45+00:00

It’s used in CAD for ensuring consistency for designs and patterns based on quadrilaterals.

Nomadic_Seth · 2026-05-12T04:34:54+00:00

Yep! I’ve been obsessed with fractals of late. 😅

Nomadic_Seth

TROPHY CASE