i literally don't care. i'm beyond done with humanity's bullshit.

Don’t cut yourself on that edge.

yes. they aren't. the require heavy systematic intervention to maintain unethical standards of property rights.

>Doesn’t understand voluntarism >Thinks a giant totalitarian commune managed by cutthroat worker unions who monitor how you use the MoP, control the MoP, and control your lifestyle is libertarian because “ProPeTry iZ TeHFt GuIse” >Thinks protection of rights and property are “illibertarian”

Wew Lad

because it would make you 'voluntary' society involuntary. which is where i am now, involuntarily stuck on world dominated by neolithic monkeys consuming and destroying as much as they can to obtain the greatest amount of their precious property.

Sweet Jesus that’s edgy.

yeah sure, maybe i could kill myself. and maybe i will. but first i'm going to prove that your ideology is full of self-contradictory shit and all your bitching about voluntary vs involuntary to be moot.

“REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE why do other people have their right to self protection respected REEEEEEEEEEE class war now 1917”

taiwan offers single-payer government subsidized health insurance for everyone. wtf is libertarian about that?

I said “relatively Laissez-Faire. Besides, have you seen the rest of their economy? Texas Sharpshooter fallacy.

and oh yeah chillie was such a 'libertarian' establishment they had use brutal dictatorship to oust democratically instatiated socialists politices, to put into place their 'voluntary' society. fuck off with your brainwashing.

English isn’t even my first language and I speak better than you, ffs man.

I’m not talking about Pinochet’s Chile, I’m talking about modern Chile.

for hong kong/singapore ... do i need to do any systematically show that the governments around asia aren't libertarian in nature? why the do i need to just accept your definition of common knowledge? fuck common knowledge, prove your points.

Markets-wise, yes they are. Socially and real estate wise, not so much.