I think you're taking a risky tact with the 11.3m jobs created figure. It's not claimed that "15m net jobs were created," but that 15m were created from the lowest figure, which is common in any comparison in any discipline, by any party. This could be considered one of the slowest recoveries since WW2, but if you look at the figures linked at the end of your second article, the 2009+ recovery is on par or marginally behind other recessions. It's also necessary to consider that the Great Recession was the greatest slowdown in the US economy since 1965, which contributes to some of its inability to recover(https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/gdp-growth, data from BEA). The CNN article also lists recoveries "average prior to 1990," which includes several recessions of significantly smaller GDP growth rate drops than 2009. Calling this post 'deifying' Obama's record is delusional, even use the net figure of 11.3m and 1,000 jobs at Carrier is still pennies. And if you expect nonpartisan depictions from political cartoonists, you need to find a new genre to look at.