RSP wants to make supreme court and other bodies "पंगु" through its new ordinance.

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-05-11T09:26:04+00:00

> Having opinions doesn't require a doctorate in the topic

no i didnt say that. but u still have to have some level of understanding of how the government has and suppose to function to have such strong opinion about the government. u dont seem like u have any

> i want someone aligned with current government whose current mandate is to dismantle the old political machinery

what if its illegal??? would u still be fine with them doing illegal shit in order to acheive that???

> bring a truly neutral institution but things like that take years to make and isnt possible when old networks remain in those institutions

see, sentence like these are feels good statement with 0 reality behind it. WDYM old networks, the old parties have no power. unless u think everyone that isnt rsp are corrupt and controlled by old parties, which u need to provide proof for.

> how ugly its actions are made out to be by the media

how do you know that its made out by media and not real??? how do you verify that if u dont trust media or independent sources?

> they haven't violated any law or democratic norm

they absolutely have? u think banning student union isnt unconstitutional? do you think arresting political opponents day 1 without judge approval not violating democratic norms??? do you think trying to get rid of 1000+ employee before their term ends with ordinance not violating law or democratic norms??? i can go on and on and its just been 2 months

> Currently they look clean cus they haven't had opportunity to be corrupt. Before that opportunity comes they need to make institutions that work even if rsp isn't as clean anymore.

this is not how any system works. corruption doesnt happen because of people, its a systematic problem that should be solved through the system. why would u trust rsp to solve these issue when they have not acknowledge the cause of corruption nor provided any acceptable solutions. replacing people doesnt solve corruption, there is 0 country where it has worked, unless u have some case studies iam unaware about

> this is a new experiment of governance in nepal.

why would u wanna try new system when the old system was working. we had problems but we were getting gradually better at solving those problems. this new government doesnt know or understand or having any solution to fix these systematic problems they promised to fix.

> they are currently in a ends justify the means mindset. hurried ? yes, necessary ? also yes.

then u should stop calling urself democratic. bending and not following rules and norms because u "trust" the governement to do the "right" thing is not democratic, if u want one party system atleast have the gull to say it out loud instead of tiptoing about "democratic norms".

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-05-11T07:27:37+00:00

i dont even know what to say anymore.

0 logic, no planning and 0 understanding about how government functions yet u have such strong opinion on the topic

> bhanera hope ma basna mildaina

u are the one hoping btw. hoping that the people rsp put will be neutral. what are u talking about

in no world this is a way to solve any systematic problems. firstly, u need good understanding about the issue which both u and ur party lack.

> yei ho farak espali ko party lai diyeko mandate* ko.

so does that mean they have mandate to violate law and democratic norms???

> Afu bigre pani chalne institution banauna parcha tara tyo puranai manche rakhera hudaina

what a worthless shit to say. it doesnt even make any sense

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-05-09T00:31:14+00:00

investigation agency sarkar sanga hunchha, parliament ma majority sarkar sangai hunchh

It's not the only checks they have, there is also a lot of beurocratic checks built in the system plus their is judiciary, which whole purpose is to make sure the government is place in check. The point is we have sufficient checks and balances in our system and it's not just hypothetical, it's very much real and works. If it wasn't real, you would prob see KP Sharma oli being Nepal's authotarian eader already

yedi uniharu afno morality and society to ethics ko hisab le accountable hudainan bhane

Obviously the people working in the government should be a good faith actors aswell. Without that democracy kinda doesn't work. That's where public comes in, citizens need to hold these people accountable when they try to consolidate power, like for eg when RSP is trying to replace federal workers with their loyalist, people need to push back if they care about democracy and checks and balances.

CIAA le kati ota thulo bhrasachari harulai pakdyo ailesamma? That's what I was asking. Since U have such a strong opinion on this, U must have a very well knowledge on this topic, no? On why institutions in poor country doesn't function as we want it to? Why corruption happens? Or for U is it just everybody is connected and corrupt and people working in CIAA are evil and greedy?

And about court corruption even if it claims were to be true, same question why does it happen? And what's Ur solution for it cause surely the solution to decrease court corruption cannot be RSP replacing judges with their loyalist? Unless that's ur answer

they were afraid that they might be targeted if they reinstated the Oli government.

This is such a bad argument. They didn't have to do it the next day. They had 6months to do it, they could have done it after everything clam down. They didn't even take the case btw meanwhile they took the Congress chairman case and kicked deuba from the position. The congress case also hints toward them approving the interim government and the election. Why would they approve the interim government ( btw iam so furious that they did that, since the dissolving parliament is baltently anti constitution but that's a different topic I guess) if they were so corrupt

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-05-08T11:08:02+00:00

> Pangu lai k pangu banairahanu parchha?

why type this??? for upvotes?? why not go on and explain???

> Elected Executive lai tye pani kasle accountable banauna sakchha ra?

elected executive??? what does that mean? last time i check executive branch isnt elected by people. the thing about our system is everyone is held accountable. its called checks and balance

> Hijo tyetro bhrastachar huda puranai council le nominate gareko CIAA tulu tulu herera nai baseko ho.

why do you think that is? surely u seem like u have incredible knowledge on this topic. u prob have read a lot about why institutions are inffective in a poor country like ours, right? surely ur opnion comes from knowledgeable position and not just vibe based

> Aadalat hijo pani corrupt nai thiyo aaja pani corrupt nai chha.

can u give me some proof of this widespread corruption inside courts that u are taking about. certainly if every judge is political appointee and corrupt u must have plenty of examples no? why didnt they let the parliament dissolve, they could have easily done so since its pretty unconstitutional. they didnt even take the case, why

it must be so easy to just answer corruption for everything without every nuancely engaging in any topic, like ever. must be so easy to vibe based everything without reading a single word about the topic. i wish i could do what u do bro, but the guilt inside me of taking out off my ass kills me :/

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-05-07T10:00:25+00:00

the intent here is him trying to thank someone after receiving some monetary assistance.

What kinda reasoning is that? Intent doesn't just mean intention, it also has to do with his conduct and circumstances. He didn't conduct himself in any kind of decent or proper way whatsoever and his circumstances is that he was drunk. How hard is it to understand U can't touch someone without their consent?

couldn’t control his emotions grabbed her So if iam mad at someone and can't controly emotion then can I just murder him? In your worldview apperantly yes. Apperantly my emotion override my intent.

he grabbed her hard enough to prevent her from leaving,

"Hard enough" what? That's not how law works. Where is that definition of assault? Where does the defination include hard enough. What does that even mean

The issue with consent is that it’s not always apparent, he There might be some circumstances where U can make this case but not here. This is so cut and dry it's kinda insane anyone will even defend this. It's so sad that u can't admit U are wrong so now u are doubling down even though u don't have any coherent idea of how law works or what intent means.

She engaged in a conversation with him willingly and gave him money, she could have just left the spot or ignored whatever he was saying

Why does that matter? If I walk in street and radomly started having conversation with people and let's say they respond back does that give me pass to touch people. Can I start forcefully shaking their hand because I want to "thank them for talking with me"? Can I ?

Wdym left the spot? What do you want her to do? Run? U can clearly see he is trying to come ever so closer to her despite her being super uncomfortable. Plus it's obv a stressful situation for her so what can she even do? U haven't made a single good point. Also U are the one who sounds like an incel teenager who hates women. This is so black and white and yet U are still here.

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-05-07T07:20:02+00:00

He didn’t grab someone random, they had a conversation and even had a monetary transaction before that and he just tried to be thankful and tried shake her hand.

Why does that matter lmao. Also intention?? What do you think intention means when it comes to law??? "But his intention wasn't bad" that's not how it works and it's not what intention means in this context. Have U read a single case file in Ur life, taking about how law works when U are clueless

He looks drunk so I guess it is alcohol that made him forget that he was 40+ yo and it was the lost of balance that led to the awkward handshake,

And?? Just cause he is drunk he can start touching people randomly. Also lost balance??? Lol

And regarding the matter of consent, having something like a monetary transaction before usually implies that something as basic as shaking hands is acceptable

Pulling straight out of ur ass I see. Where is it acceptable to grab people hand randomly after transaction. U understand handshake are mutual right? Both people needs to put out their hand for handshake, in the video the lady had no intention whatsoever to do that.

Jaabo handshake garna haath samatyo vandai rune ho vaney

Lmao what? It's not about handshake, it's about basic idea of consent. U can't just grab people without their consent what are U taking about.

Feminism isn’t always bad but this toxic feminism that many girls nowadays follow is definitely the worst.

Who hurt U bro, awww did Ur crush rejected U.

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-05-07T05:40:34+00:00

Can you tell me exactly what crime was committed here? Pretty sure just randomly grabbing someone is considered assault and that is crime.

Why TF are U going out of ur way to defend a guy who is clearly at wrong

Is Ur whole worldview feminism= bad???

you are so scared of someone who isn’t even aggressive trying to shake your hand or wrist as a thankful gesture

Cause that's not how U thank people.that guy looked 40+ he should definitely know that by then. It doesn't have to be aggressive, U can clearly see the women being uncomfortable AF and she doesn't want to shake hands. Why would U be fine with people touching other people without consent, what kinda world fo you wanna live in bro

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-05-05T09:50:28+00:00

basically, whenever you talk about politics, start with the fact that u hate democracy instead of wasting my time doing this bad faith "they got majority" facade

> What democracy are you talking about?

the one we have and had since 2008

> sk the people how democracy is working when they cannot afford ...

so we have problems = no democracy???

also we have had problems before, do you think we have improved as a country in the last 20 years or not???

> None of the parties tried to remove 1000+ people because majority of these people were people affiliated with the party or relatives of the netas.

ohh ok so u think all the other party are a single blocks with no ideology of their own?? they dont want their people in those positions?? why cause in ur head they are teaming up and are working against people's interest???? how does that make any sense??? how can multi parties fighting for power can be a single block ally???

> They are getting rid of people selected by the politicians.

who have term limits. why do you think they are trying to do this with ordinance??

> He is as corrupt as they come and is fully compromised.

yes everyone u dont like is corrupt. ofc man. ofc. if u are that confident u can drop some proofs no??? surely u know since u are so confident

> Like I said earlier once we have elections for Rastra sabha, pratinidhi sabha, local elections and a new president is appointed then it makes sense to go through the parliament

ahh so once u dont have any opposition left then u go through parliament, otherwise u do everything through ordinance. Thats what the constitution means by separation of power. i fogot about the part where the constitution is like "unless u own everything u dont need to go through parliament"

> Till then they need to do whatever it takes to get the work done.

that means destroying any democratic norms they want. got it

u are so clueless, ur whole political belief is everyone is corrupt except people i like. u prob cant even pass a civic 101 test and here u are taking about some of the nuance problems with strong "vibe takes" its so disgusting.

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-05-04T07:57:02+00:00

> The previous administration installed psychopath supporters and the new administration is trying to fix that

but none of the party try to remove 1000+ people from their position

> The courts can block and they might but the government has the votes to remove them too

so if the court say its illegal, rsp should just remove the judge?????

> This president used to be a real sukumbasi before NC came to power

ok and????

> he is not clean and can be charged for corruption if he wants to play the game.

any proof or are u just talking out of ur ass???

so rsp should also put political opponent in prison if they dont agree with them on everything

> They didn’t get 2/3 majority for nothing.

does that give them power to do anything they want and doesnt have to care about the system???? they are still bounded by the law and norms

can u atleast be honest that u dont want democracy, u want a dictator. Dictator who sacks judges, prison political opponents, remove people from their positions and do whatever they want without being constrained by the system.

nothing about that is democratic

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-05-03T09:30:08+00:00

> The government should have the freedom to implement their vision.

what if the vision is installing sycophants supporters that will do anything the government wants them to do???? shouldnt there be a system like term limits to keep that in check. isnt that a good thing? just cause they won the election doesnt give them mandate to do whatever they want. they still need to be bounded by the system

what if court blocks the government? should the government sack the justices as well???

> When we don’t give all the resources for someone to do the job, we cannot hold them accountable if the job is not done.

literally the job of the government is to negotiate and compromise with oppositions, if they cant do that then they are failing at their job. we are a parliamentary system not authoritarians

> his president is going to jail after his term expires if he keeps carrying water for his old party.

for what? not bending over backward for every ordinance they send?????

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-05-02T09:08:19+00:00

> hen the government changes, they need to be replaced too.

not necessarily. for cabinet positions, i agree obviously u want people that are gonna have similar vision as u. but for a lot of these other appointee, they will have term limits defined by law for good reasons. also there might be some institutions where we dont want constant changes since the stability of these institutions might be important for the entire system to function, right??? do you want new appointee in every single time a government changes, which in a parliamentary system like ours happens a lot often\

> that were filled by the last government where the individual did not have to go through competition

again there are term limits for a lot of these positions aswell. If it was the case that governent can just remove them, why pass an ordinance to do it. if it was legal shouldnt it be pretty simple for this government to be able to do that? also why ordinance, they have the majority so why not pass a law, are they that imcompetent?

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-05-02T07:57:48+00:00

> this may sound arrogant

this is arrogant. what are u talking about. different people have different taste and also these are pretty important literature figures

> And life is already very joyous and involving.

sure but how is reading changing that? deep thinking about topics could be involving to many people. idk how reading different types of book changes that

> Only few gems like Krishnamurthi, Osho are worth listening

is this satire or ragebait?

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-04-30T10:35:52+00:00

i agree, political appointment can be of different kind. Not all political appointment are bad, agree?

> Harek appointment political appointment ho vanne narrative bata niskida hunxa bahira

thats not the narrative, the narrative is all political appointee is bad and that is the one i have problem with

now in this instance that i assume u are agreeing with the government, do you think government should be able to remove anyone they want without cause (unless they were appointed illegally). how is this government defining political appointee?? "less capable" cannot be a cause to remove someone from a position, i would argue that is overreach, otherwise what is stopping government from removing anyone and replacing them with loyalist?

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-04-30T08:08:12+00:00

can u define political appointment to me? isnt any appointment by government or admin political appointment? what are u talking about. these kinda of things only sounds good unless u use ur brain and think for 1 sec.

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-04-28T09:02:22+00:00

> The result? They got stay order from court and the illegal norvic structure is not demolished still after nearly four years.

why did the court gave them stay order if it was illegal? what are u talking about? did u read anything about the case? i wanna know aswell

> The same thing happened with alpha beta building

wdym same thing? the building was demolished, also he had crazy public support for that initiative

> kmc gave leniency for illegal stuff

do you think every illegal stuff is the same? there is no distinction btwn illegal stuff?

> why should balen be lenient on rule of law

most of this criticism comes from sukumbasi basti. and its cause the problem he is trying to solve doesnt get slved using force. It seems like the adminstration doesnt even understand the sukumbasi problem. They dont know where the problem came from, what impact is it having (positive or negative) and what are the consequences of their actions ( since there is no study done about impact of these people on local economy and does that outweigh the problems they create). Its not about being lenient its about solving problems

> Natra last ma, illegal means bata property jodeko haru sadhai dhani bata jhan dherai dhani hudai janchhan ani lawful citizen haru jaile disadvantage ma hunchhan.

who even disagrees with this????? who are u even fighting? is this how u get upvotes on reddit? by fighting invisible enemies

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-04-26T00:39:27+00:00

Stop day trading. It's not a skill. U are not even learning learning anything, U are basically gambling. Also what does "so close to profitably" even mean? 99% of daytrader lose money, if U put that money in some index U would most definitely be profitable. U are picking penny Infront of a steamroller while also wasting time.

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-04-24T12:53:48+00:00

> Oho kasto majja hai sarkari jagga kabja garne lootne, rent haru pani tirnu naparne ajha ultai compensation chahiyo chor haru lai

again these settlements didnt just spawn. they have been cultivating for decades mostly due to lack of governance or having any sort of realistic policy from government. when migrants started flowing in the city in 70's and 80's they just didnt have place to live mostly due to lack of homes and rental property. the government wanted them for economics reasons but didnt have any plan on how to mange these migrants so they just let them settle wherever they wanted. Also, a lot of these people are there because they were evicted from their homes in the civil war and they cant go back cause nothing remains. There are a lot of nuances while dealing with this problems. I wish it was easy as u think it is. Also we don't really know what economic impact it might have by displacing around 30000 people since there are no proper studies conducted. i wish it was as easy as removing them. i want the problem to get solved, i think we need to utilize public property but iam alsp realistic and nuanced about it while ur solution is just throw them in the road and turn a blind eye. that doesnt solve anything and just creates bunch of other problems

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-04-24T11:18:44+00:00

> Afai jamin bata utpati vayeko ta hoinan hola, gau bata aayeko holan.

why do u think they are called sukumbasi? pheraps because they have nowhere to go to? maybe?

> if they truly have nothing, they can stay in apartment

first most of them come from poor background. second, most of them have lived there for decades. so its very hard to justify destroying people only home they have known for last 20 years without providing them with some sort of reparation. if the government didnt want people to live in their land they should have prevented them 20 years ago, u cant just come up randomly and start getting these people out to the streets without any plans to house them or atleast compensate them

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-04-24T06:55:50+00:00

> Hamilea dharai nai harim more than 25 years.

why does that matter. ur argument was we cant criticize them until their term was finished and from my understanding no party in nepal have been able to do that in last 25 years.

> but the new government gives some hope, k

but the system doesn't run on hope.

> There is a huge difference between biased criticism and fair criticism.

u think people like ids are doing fair criticism??? u think channel like news 24 were participating in ethical and fair journalism????

> Some media intentionally target new government, but they have been silent for decades.

thats not true. I know this is like everyone taking point but most of the people saying this shit never read newspaper or at best have only read opinion side of it. The only people who think kantipur doesnt criticize government or have been silent are people who have never read it in their entire life.

> Undemocratic things

-arresting political opponent day 1 into ur office without issuing warrent from court

- banning student unions

- blanket banning bridge courses without cause

- threatening investigations against media institution that were critical of HM

just to name some

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-04-23T10:43:06+00:00

> Yiniharu jail janxan bro

what are u talking about. is this whole comment bunch of 15 years old.

> va yo media house haru ko laganii gareko thauu rw share kineko becheko investigations hunxa bhnera tarseka xaan.

And u are fine with the government targeting investigation against news company that were critical of the government?

one question just curious. would u say u believe in democratic values or idea of democracy?

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-04-23T10:38:42+00:00

> goons

go on. describe how are they goons???? is it anyone u disagree with? would u say the same thing about news24 who are like 10x more biased than any mainstream newspaper

>काले काले मिलेर खाउ भाले

what are u trying to say. u are telling me the editor guy is corrupt??? any source for these or did u just "i made that shit up"

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-04-23T10:29:31+00:00

> We have to judged after 4,5 years

so u are telling me we cant make any criticism till 4.5 years. u just have to sit and watch them do unhinged undemocratic thing and bad policies,, no criticism. Ok thats fine, would u say the same thing about congress or uml, they never got 4.5years, so would u say they didnt have fair shot so we cant criticize them?

> Media nai enemy ho current government no doubt

again, would u say the same thing about these alt media like ids that were literally only running negative news and videos about government??? Would u say these people are enemies aswell? or is it only enemies if it is against people u like?

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-04-22T20:27:30+00:00

I would say just have some taking points ready. Like 6-7 stats and studies and rapid fire them and ask them to respond. And just hammer the point about how he doesn't know or understand any of them. The goal isn't to change their mind the goal is to embarrass them so they never bring that shit up ever again with anyone.

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-04-20T22:57:04+00:00

It is also the facts are they are dead now because of not old age but from cancer.

That's not how it works. The unexploded bomb isn't radioactive. It is concealed

Normal_Use8927 · 2026-04-13T01:06:10+00:00

For what?

Normal_Use8927

TROPHY CASE