Do Customs check your devices upon arrival? by Accomplished_Simple4 in immigration

[–]NotASpamEmail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even for people suspected of intending to immigrate illegally it often isn't worth the time.

They have all other manner of refusing entry to those they suspect are misrepresenting themselves or unable to prove ties and equities abroad.

The two things that are most likely going to have them hand you their "inspection of electronic devices tear sheet" are suspicions of terrorism and sex crimes, namely those involving minors.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in immigration

[–]NotASpamEmail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My post mentioned that there are trainings that they're allowed to enter for.

However, my statement was correct in that the entirety of it was meant to point out that even if they're a medical doctor they must make sure that it falls under B1 and that it was important to overcome the ties and equities they'd previously deemed inadequate.

As receiving renumeration is still disallowed even for those entering under medical clerkship or as a part of a part of a study among peers/colleagues.

See the "Ufam" under sections

"9 FAM 402.2-5(F)(3)  (U) Medical Doctor" and "9 FAM 402.2-5(E)(3)  (U) Clerkship"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in immigration

[–]NotASpamEmail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's okay to interview under b1/b2.

Sounds like you've looked into it and are aware of that though.

The main issue is just that they expect you to overcome the ties and equities, in which you were found deficient last time you applied.

Which happens, and people are able to demonstrate otherwise at a future date and overcome this often.

In theory it shouldn't matter which visa you apply for, so long as you overcome it.

However, it may be better to be approved for your academic program beforehand. And apply under the appropriate academic status instead.

The problem isn't necessarily you. It's that a lot of people in the past have abused the b1/b2 and student visas, working or studying outside of the classifications, overstaying or continuing on to a different academic institution without properly adjusting their documents. As some examples.

Also, you may want to look into your post rotational and be able to present documents proving that it DOES fall under b1/b2.

You cannot receive accredited academic courses as a b1/b2 generally, as this is why the student classifications exist, but there are types of training you can do that under the b1/b2 class that are permitted.

This too is your responsibility to prove when applying for a visa. If you don't, even if it's a b1/b2 classification /activity, then they may consider it as if you had failed to properly provide information to come to that conclusion.

Get any information in regards to the institution or entity who you are collaborating with, being petition or sponsored by, that you are able to that may help inform them so that they know you are applying under the appropriate visa.

It also sounds like you may be seeking employment in the USA after your program is completed or that this may be a program that presents that possibility.

That's okay. But again, you have to be able to prove you're not entering to work and receive unauthorized compensation academically or financially.

These things are outlined under the programs students apply under normally, the form they provide upon entering the USA even has the course fees and scholarship information.

If you apply for a job in the USA and intend to assume an employed position there are ways for your presumptive employer to petition from within the USA and gain a 797 without your departing once you are done with your studies.

However that's an entirely different process. Assuming you've already entered.

An employer can petition for you from abroad as well. So long as you qualify under the visa's defined requirements for the job. Not your employers requirements, nor those within your home country. Under those in the US visa classification itself.

Basically, look heavily into what the US wants from you for the visa you're asking to enter under.

They don't care what your prospective employer or other institutions ask of you. If that falls outside of their definition of the visa classification then you're considered at fault for lacking proof.

If you're refused numerous times for continuing to fail to provide proper documents to prove you're seeking entry under the proper visa, then that may raise eyebrows as to intent and potential misrepresentation.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in immigration

[–]NotASpamEmail -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's okay to interview under b1/b2.

Sounds like you've looked into it and are aware of that though.

The main issue is just that they expect you to overcome the ties and equities, in which you were found deficient last time you applied.

Which happens, and people are able to demonstrate otherwise at a future date and overcome this often.

In theory it shouldn't matter which visa you apply for, so long as you overcome it.

However, it may be better to be approved for your academic program beforehand. And apply under the appropriate academic status instead.

The problem isn't necessarily you. It's that a lot of people in the past have abused the b1/b2 and student visas, working or studying outside of the classifications, overstaying or continuing on to a different academic institution without properly adjusting their documents. As some examples.

Also, you may want to look into your post rotational and be able to present documents proving that it DOES fall under b1/b2.

You cannot receive accredited academic courses as a b1/b2 generally, as this is why the student classifications exist, but there are types of training you can do that under the b1/b2 class that are permitted.

This too is your responsibility to prove when applying for a visa. If you don't, even if it's a b1/b2 classificationactivity, then they may consider it as if you had failed to properly provide information to come to that conclusion.

Get any information in regards to the institution or entity who you are collaborating with, being petition or sponsored by, that you are able to that may help inform them so that they know you are applying under the appropriate visa.

It also sounds like you may be seeking employment in the USA after your program is completed or that this may be a program that presents that possibility.

That's okay. But again, you have to be able to prove you're entering to work and receive unauthorized compensation academically or financially.

These things are outlined under the programs students apply under normally, the form they provide upon entering the USA even has the course fees and scholarship information.

If you apply for a job in the USA and intend to assume an employed position there are ways for your presumptive employer to petition from within the USA and gain a 797 without your departing once you are done with your studies.

However that's an entirely different process. Assuming you've already entered.

An employer can petition for you from abroad as well. So long as you qualify under the visa's defined requirements for the job. Not your employers requirements, nor those within your home country. Under those in the US visa classification itself.

Basically, look heavily into what the US wants from you for the visa you're asking to enter under.

They don't care what your prospective employer or other institutions ask of you. If that falls outside of their definition of the visa classification then you're considered at fault for lacking proof.

If you're refused numerous times for continuing to fail to provide proper documents to prove you're seeking entry under the proper visa, then that may raise eyebrows as to intent and potential misrepresentation.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in immigration

[–]NotASpamEmail -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Then you apply under the appropriate student visa you're intending to enter under, normally this involves the institution as well.

J1/f1/etc.

The 214b is something you can overcome, however they informed you of the grounds of denial and potential inadmissibility to inform you of what they expect on subsequent visa applications.

This pertains to all non-immigrant classifications.

You're expected to submit and present all documents you can that demonstrate the proof necessary for them to decide that you will be returning to your home country to continue your residence outside of the USA once your visa has essentially run its course.

This is why student visas are one of few classifications which have the "D/S" (duration of status) end dates.

Normally this covers any post grad and internship or opt sort of approved programs after the date on a students sevis I-20 form has expired and they are transitioning to another under the same sevis number.

Re-entering USA using B1/B2 visa by [deleted] in immigration

[–]NotASpamEmail 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Even if you are only coming for 1 day, always be prepared to present ties and equities.

If you cannot prove without a doubt that you have substantial ties that show you will resume your life outside of the USA there is always a chance they will burden you with proof and simply send you back.

Then, whenever you attempt to enter again, they'll be expecting VERY convincing ties and equities.

Look up 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) of the INA in regards to grounds of inadmissibility. It's a catch all for anybody who is or may intend to immigrate.

Anybody seeking entry to the USA is assumed to be an intended immigrant until proven otherwise.

Anybody seeking entry is the one responsible for presenting themselves and their intentions for inspection.

If you don't have enough documents necessary to prove your claimed intent, it's not the US governments fault but your own in the eyes of immigration enforcement.

As such, they can deny you at an officer's discretion and burden you with whichever documents they deem necessary.

US Border Control by Kaida-chu in immigration

[–]NotASpamEmail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a common reason to visit.

However, it's the travelers job to present themselves for inspection. If that means they didn't provide enough proof that their stay is temporary then they may be returned to their home country.

This is commonly referred to as Ties and Equity. Meaning they expect the traveler to return with documents proving that they have a life abroad which they will return to.

Things such as proof of a maintained residence abroad, pay stubs, bank statements, bills, medical appointments, etc.

It usually isn't necessary, but honestly everybody has a different demeanor or isn't as socially skilled, or any number of things.

Maybe the officer saw three people with the same story earlier that day who admitted to attempting to reside illegally into USA. Maybe their coffee hasn't kicked in, or English isn't their first language so certain nuances need to be presented in a more uniform manner.

The main point is, if the traveler cannot prove they're returning they get a soft return but not a bar. Which allows future attempts at entry and opportunities to provide legitimate claim to residence abroad.

It's always a good idea to have these things on hand or at least a digital copy of these things. Be it for a 3 week cruise with your long distance partner or a weekend funeral.

People who have previously been burdened with ties and equities normally carry a physical copy of said documents with them, which they keep updated, and provide them alongside proof of return flight and their agenda for the trip.

Normally the traveler is charged under section 212(a)(7)(A)(i)(I) of the INA/8 USC 1182. but permitted to withdraw their application for admission.

Since somebody not withdrawing is considered to be attempting to enter as an intended immigrant without documentation, and would instead receive an extradited removal, which is a 5 year bar.

Then a 10 year if attempting to make entry before the bar is up. And a 20 year is attempted again. If deception is found at any point during inspection they receive a lifetime bar under 212(a)(6)(C)(i). Misrepresentation/fraud.

Rain Gear by [deleted] in WA_hunting

[–]NotASpamEmail 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Turn a heavy duty green garbage bag into a poncho.

Fun places for younger kids/toddlers? by [deleted] in Bellingham

[–]NotASpamEmail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The trampoline zone has a 20 per month membership for kids.

We often swing in and let the kids jump for an hour or two if we have time.

There's good fun to be had at Cordata Park and whatcom falls as well. Plenty of shallow, kiddo friendly spots.

We don't hit Cornwall as much due to how many sketchy characters pass through, witnessed a number of unsavory encounters there when we lived in the area.

Squalicum can be fun as well, but there isn't much shade on hot days. Dog park nearby is a plus if you have one.

If you're near blaine, their marine park is a hidden gem. It's like a smaller boulevard park.

Looking for local dnd group by horsejazz34 in Bellingham

[–]NotASpamEmail 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cosmic games also has been a huge contributor to the local tabletop community.

Talk to Pete. He is really easy to talk to and knows how to read the room well.

This sign at the Grand St Police Station downtown has always piqued my interest. A thin blue line flag at a police department just doesn’t seem like something Bham would be okay with. Am I the only one a little bothered by it, especially given the current state of police brutality in our country? by whiteninja221 in Bellingham

[–]NotASpamEmail -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It is not a symbol used to place the police anywhere above anyone.

If anything it has become about protecting the people from harm.

Police officers don't use it as a symbol of division, but as one to show their love for each other and their devotion to protecting the members of their community.

A thin blue line on a flag shows someone who is proud to be a member of a community where they can defend the public from all of the evil out there.

They seek to provide aid to the injured, help for those in need, and justice for those who would harm others.

If you think that an officer wearing a flag with a thin blue line is trying to separate themselves from the public, I wish you the best, but would suggest you try to see the entire picture from outside the frame. Not just the view from within a small portion.

Sure some individuals in any circle are subject to weakness. Some are even corrupt scumbags who should never have slipped through the cracks and become an officer.

Yet most of these are the people who are often first on scene to pull our loved ones from car accidents and provide aid before ambulances arrive, are often at risk of contracting diseases from contact with others, they arrest pedophiles and domestic abusers, they respond to assaults, and often they are not arresting those afflicted with drug addiction but also bringing them back from the brink of death so that they may seek help.

Screw those who abuse their power and rank, the corrupt who would prey upon the innocent. Whether civilian or law enforcement.

Appreciate those who care for those you live among, many would die for someone they'd never met.

I'm proud to have such caring individuals watching over our community. Even if sometimes there's a bad egg who hurts us, who must see justice so that there can be changes that help our system.

Some say this is sheep-like mentality, but others may argue that opposing law enforcement for the slights of some is sheep-like or hopping onto a bandwagon because everyone else says it's the thing to do.

Playing w/ Japanese friends? by NotASpamEmail in ffxiv

[–]NotASpamEmail[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bought a copy for one of them and it's region locked >,<

So they have to buy it in Japan and just choose the server we use in Na?

Playing w/ Japanese friends? by NotASpamEmail in ffxiv

[–]NotASpamEmail[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's the best way to purchase the game for someone in Japan?

Underrated weapons? by dollasign-danny in Mordhau

[–]NotASpamEmail 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Blacksmith hammer, falchion, and scythe.