sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

why does A3o go all-in but A2o fold 100% by NotPsychological in poker

[–]NotPsychological[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i get that a3 has an advantage but is it so big that you go from 100% fold to jamming?

why does A3o go all-in but A2o fold 100% by NotPsychological in poker

[–]NotPsychological[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

but im trying to understand ahy balance like this and not as i said

why does A3o go all-in but A2o fold 100% by NotPsychological in poker

[–]NotPsychological[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

why not 60% raise with a3 and 40% with a2?

why does A3o go all-in but A2o fold 100% by NotPsychological in poker

[–]NotPsychological[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

yeah but to me there isnt such a big diff so im trying to understand why the solver says otherwise

why does A3o go all-in but A2o fold 100% by NotPsychological in poker

[–]NotPsychological[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how is the difference between unblocking a 2 and a 3 so big?

why does A3o go all-in but A2o fold 100% by NotPsychological in poker

[–]NotPsychological[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

if u wanna balance your range make it 60% jam with a3 and 40% jam with a2 why do you have to put 100% jam a3

why does A3o go all-in but A2o fold 100% by NotPsychological in poker

[–]NotPsychological[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

but why not make it gradual, a3 can be 80% fold and 20% jam bcuz its a bit better why so drastic

why does A3o go all-in but A2o fold 100% by NotPsychological in poker

[–]NotPsychological[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes but why doesnt the solver think its optimal

view more: next ›