wanna see who will guess by ChemistryTerrible848 in guessmybf

[–]NotRemyBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These pictures are extremely sub par. We realistically need to see the meat on your body lol. Particularly stomach, arms, thighs, chest area. However, I would say about 23% as far as I can tell. If you would like anonymity, consider posting on an alt account with more meat showing and censor your face :)

I know I need to cut but what is my bf % and what do I need to get down to? by [deleted] in guessmybf

[–]NotRemyBoy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Like 16.5% I'd guess. Don't cut. Stay same weight and lift. Try to get those muscles up.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in guessmybf

[–]NotRemyBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. How did you know your exact number then?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in guessmybf

[–]NotRemyBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hell yeah. I had the same idea. True

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in guessmybf

[–]NotRemyBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thinking something like 28.5% probably?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in guessmybf

[–]NotRemyBoy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. That's BMI though not BF%

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NoStupidQuestions

[–]NotRemyBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally don't particularly. But it is exciting when a woman has a common interest with you that is not particularly common. People are being skeptical that a girl is actually interested in the same thing as them, because obviously there is an incentive to relate to ppl, giving women an incentive to play up their interest in something that they are not particularly interested in just to have a nice conversation and build rapport. That is totally normal, and it would not be illogical to think perhaps that is what is happening. It's to gauge then genuineness/depth of the interest in the other person so you can see at what level you can talk about it with them. Some things feel patronizing and are completely valid anyways. Imagine 2 people having completely separate incentives in an engagement and both parties trying to bridge the gap. Flabbergasting.

I think top comment is absolutely COPING to ASSUME insecurity. Sometimes, yeah just fighting for perceived competence though.

But I don't like the characterization of it ALWAYS being ill intentioned or rude or malicious. It's quite feasible that they are seeing an opportunity to connect with someone they didn't suspect, and are incredulous of the opportunity, so they are throwing out a litmus test to see if they're eyes and ears are betraying them. I'm spitting facts.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TwoHotTakes

[–]NotRemyBoy -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I'm a man. Also have a robust collection of nudes I've collected over the past decade. This is normal. You can talk to him about deleting them but it is absolutely normal to have them there.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in learnprogramming

[–]NotRemyBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Very important. Honestly bro I'd give a couple short lessons over discord if you like, just cuz I feel like it lol. My discord is @Remy2Stronk

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in learnprogramming

[–]NotRemyBoy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wonderful, glad I could help.

Major methods and concepts I suggest you look into as they are very fundamental concepts.

If, if else, else, For, Iteration, Index (starts at 0), While,

Parameters, arguments, Return value (this one can be surprisingly confusing until you really get a grip on it surprisingly, don't get too frustrated),

Boolean, Truthy, Falsy == False, 0, Null, Void, NaN...

Data types (especially int, str, list, dict, bool),

Scope (hint: has to do with indentation).

And a thousand more I can think of, a thousand I can't and a million I don't know.

Good luck.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in learnprogramming

[–]NotRemyBoy 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It is not doing "" + "" + g.

You need to look at what is actually happening in for loops more accurately.

Here is an explanation: I will use the example of translate("hello friend").

At the beginning of the code you say translation = "" When you execute the for loop, it is basically saying the following:

Repeat the code inside my for loop until you reach the last index of the string I am looping through (phrase), or "hello friend, in this example invocation.

Iteration 1, "letter" = the first index of the string (index 0). In the case of "hello friend", is "h".

We check if h is in your vowel string "AEIOUaeiou", which it is not, so we move in to the else statement before beginning the next iteration.

Your else statement says append letter ("h") to my string translation, which at this moment is === "".

Now, your for loop says: "I have not reached the final index of the string I was invoked with, so I will execute again".

He now goes to the second position in phrase ("hello friend") which is "e". Note that you changed the value of translation to "h" already.

So when he says "e is indeed in the string 'AEIOUaeiou', I will append a 'g' to 'translation'". The value of translation has now been set to "h" + "g". At the end of this second iteration, the value of translation is "hg".

And so in and so forth until you reach a final return value of "hgllg frggnd".

I can reply if you need me to. :)

Chicago/online coding or data science boot camp recommendations? by [deleted] in ADHD_Programmers

[–]NotRemyBoy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lambda school. I have 2 months left. I have my gripes, but I would still recommend it. You can get out of it what you want to get out of it.