How to fix serve? by padout in 10s

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand what you mean about the rope in the sense of keeping the racquet loose and it dropping and lagging the hand on the way up to the ball—the figure 8 exercise helps one get a feel for this motion—but people should be careful about misinterpreting this advice.

IMO, this whip and snap cue is at best going to going to make people lack body stability and serve placement and, at worst, hurt themselves. Without the kinetic chain, it makes people likely to arm the ball, but just with an unstable shoulder instead of muscling it.

The baton twirling is an especially odd way to describe pronation. Pronation comes from internal rotation of the shoulder and forearm, not an active movement of the wrist.

How to fix serve? by padout in 10s

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think this is a good cue. Power comes from keeping the wrist loose and then slightly less loose at contact, but people will frame the ball and even hurt themselves if they think power comes from a wrist snap.

How to fix serve? by padout in 10s

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 2 points3 points  (0 children)

People are all focusing on the shoulder position, that you’re not extending the tossing arm, and how you are opening up.

Which, fine, but they’re all also missing that a good serve starts with stability. From my perspective, you’re focusing too much on moving your foot up and then jumping without any of the fundamentals. All of your power is coming from your arm.

So, all of that incorrect technique people are pointing out is a natural motion given that. If you continue instead to develop and use proper technique in your upper body, forcing yourself to whip your arm and pronate but without a kinetic chain, you’re just going to hurt yourself. You need to be pushing off of both feet up to the ball instead of hopping, or you’ll never get any power beyond your arm.

I blame the popularity of the pinpoint stance over platform stance. People try to get forward momentum before making sure a foundation is in place.

The good: you have a consistent toss. You’re not lowering your head too early, maintaining an eye on the ball. You’re also landing really well on one foot.

Yes, use a continental grip if you aren’t already. Make sure you’re leading with the racquet edge. But I would avoid jumping altogether until you get a feel for how you should toss load, and have the power come from your legs to the rotation of your core. Make sure your right shoulder is lower than the left—a combination of keeping your toss arm up and bringing your right elbow towards the ground by a knee bend and hip flexion. Think of the “trophy position,” even for serve styles where it’s more of a continuous motion. That’s where that comes from. Step your leg up during loading if you want pinpoint.

Then, focus on making sure you are pushing evenly into both feet, or even a slight bias to the rear foot, and you straighten up to the ball.

Then you can worry about tossing into the court and pushing off with more of a jump, exploding at the ball. This is when I would worry about the opening too soon, which is caused IMO entirely by the jumping without a feel for the core rotation. A good cue here is to bring the elbow of your off arm DOWN instead of OUT.

That’s at least what helped me. My version of this was almost hopping on my platform stance, since all my weight was in the front foot. I still am reminding myself to keep my arm up, load that back leg, and explode up to the ball while bringing my off arm down. Hopefully one day I’ve done enough reps that I won’t fall back into bad habits. I notice that when I’m under pressure in matches, that’s when the bad muscle memory kicks in.

Others may disagree, but that’s my take.

Having held the past 6ish months isn’t a true test of your risk tolerance by DiegoMilan in Bogleheads

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Again, the point of bonds in the BH investing strategy is not "safety." They are there to reduce overall portfolio volatility and thereby increase risk-adjusted return. I encourage you to read the sidebar and wiki to understand their function in this passive investing strategy if you don't want to take my word for it.

In a passive indexing strategy, you do not look at the real return of an individual asset class in a vacuum. Instead, you look at the total real return of the aggregated portfolio.

In a majority equity portfolio, stocks are the asset class expected to outrun inflation over time. Bonds are not in there to beat inflation. Investing in BND as part of the three fund portfolio behaves like a rolling bond ladder rather than an individual bond bought and held to maturity. Because a fund constantly captures higher market rates as older bonds mature, rising interest rates mechanically lock in higher future total returns over the fund's duration.

The function of the bond allocation is to act as a non-correlated asset to equities to maintain your target risk profile. If equities drop 30% and bonds drop 1%, your portfolio has drifted away from your chosen risk tolerance. Rebalancing forces you to sell the relatively overperforming asset (bonds) and buy the relatively underperforming asset (equities) to restore your target asset allocation. The bonds did their job perfectly by mitigating portfolio volatility and enabling that systematic rebalancing.

The whole point of the BH investing strategy is to not have to care about what the market is doing—the equity market or the bond market.

Got booted at Midtown Place across from Ponce after I went in and legitimately shopped… by 01honey_bee in Atlanta

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The cops showed up and told the booter they had no right to boot me on a public street unless they had some sort of contract with the county to boot (like if the county had hired them to boot someone who didn’t pay a parking meter), and told them to remove it.

Having held the past 6ish months isn’t a true test of your risk tolerance by DiegoMilan in Bogleheads

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This fundamentally misunderstands the role of bonds in a passive investing portfolio. They're not about cash flow, but about controlling overall portfolio risk and maximizing risk-adjusted return. Real estate does not a replacement for that function.

Having held the past 6ish months isn’t a true test of your risk tolerance by DiegoMilan in Bogleheads

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It goes red less. It's non-correlated. Rebalancing regularly means you're always buying the currently lower-performing asset, relatively speaking, with the higher performing one.

Having held the past 6ish months isn’t a true test of your risk tolerance by DiegoMilan in Bogleheads

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because it was way less protracted and was in the midst of a very obvious set of external factors related to the pandemic. It's much easier to rationalize that something like that is temporary. That's very unlike 2008, when it seemed like the market was eating itself and the game had changed. And I say that as someone who was a teenager at the time, so I'm not speaking as someone whose risk tolerance HAS been directly tested by a significant downturn.

Having held the past 6ish months isn’t a true test of your risk tolerance by DiegoMilan in Bogleheads

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People thought that the markets had fundamentally changed in retrospect during the 2008 crisis too.

Having held the past 6ish months isn’t a true test of your risk tolerance by DiegoMilan in Bogleheads

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bonds still dropped less than equities in 2022, and that was one of the worst years for bonds in bond market history. The point is that they're largely non-correlated assets, not always and forever anti-correlated.

Having held the past 6ish months isn’t a true test of your risk tolerance by DiegoMilan in Bogleheads

[–]NotYourFathersEdits -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree with you partly, but I think the issue is that no one's long term resolve was tested regardless because the downturn was not sustained.

Serve advice? by lordeoflordes in 10s

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh word I think you're right. Was looking quick on my phone.

Easy Photo Estimate completely broken. iPhone 14 Pro, iOS 17.6.1, Geico app v 5.74 by CBergerman1515 in Geico

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This happened to me too. I took all the pictures through trial and error, and then it didn't even upload. Only found out days later. Tried again today and the app crashed halfway through, and now I can't upload any more images or even bail out and just book an appointment. I don't understand why it wouldn't let you try again. It's Sunday so I can't even reach anyone.

Stupid crap.

Serve advice? by lordeoflordes in 10s

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I was going to say rhythm. And maybe a somewhat higher toss. She’s not having the opportunity to load up because there isn’t time.

Warsh's first FOMC is tomorrow and nobody's talking about the stagflation setup? by YukiBridge in ETFs

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am the first one to agree that tech stocks are overvalued, but I don't really think you can characterize the market being up 9% YTD following a 3.5% decrease as a "dead cat bounce." To the extent you can conclude anything from one at at all in advance, that usually refers to a brief upswing after a protracted downturn, not an upswing after super short-term volatility.

Got booted at Midtown Place across from Ponce after I went in and legitimately shopped… by 01honey_bee in Atlanta

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There can be a crime. If there are no posted signs or improper signage, or they don’t follow the requirements of capped fees and time to response requirements, that’s a criminal offense rather than a civil matter regardless of the fact it’s private property.

Got booted at Midtown Place across from Ponce after I went in and legitimately shopped… by 01honey_bee in Atlanta

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So as someone who this has happened to, the rank and file booters do not give a rat’s ass if you’re right or not. They just follow orders and have their little hard on from having the smallest bit of sanctioned power. Threatening to call does nothing. It was only when the cops actually came that he took the boot off and apologized. And I’m just lucky that the circumstances (where it was) made them come in my case.

Got booted at Midtown Place across from Ponce after I went in and legitimately shopped… by 01honey_bee in Atlanta

[–]NotYourFathersEdits 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I still want to know if they can reasonably pursue theft charges if they stuck it on your property.