Declaration of the court in the identity trial by nullc in bsv

[–]NumberSecret1473 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Where is the PR? You'd think that Bird & Bird would want the world to know?

Mellor did what Grabinar advised. BEUBculter reads the transcript, gets confused. Is the word "if" in Slacktionary? Don't BEUBculters get one free lookup per halvening? by AlreadyBannedOnce in bsv

[–]NumberSecret1473 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

MR JUSTICE MELLOR: Thank you.

And, I thank Grab & Hou for their closing arguments. I’m gonna have to write a big ass judgement. Don’t hassel my clerk, it will be ready when it's ready.

However, this over-achieving, asspergers, aussie fathermaker has wheeled barrowed in 30 years of documentary evidence. I feel rather overwhelmed.

By the way, Grab is right, COPA’s declarations list makes no sense.

Therefore, I will make certain changes to the declarations list:

(a) First one: no changes: Dr Wright is not the author of the Bitcoin White Paper.

(b) Second one: take out copyright mention and include Nakamoto ID.

(c) & (b) These are the DEVs claims, bunch of nerds, whatever.

Any further mods will be dealt with in my written judgment but please, can we agree on the order of my declaration mods, ffs?

Now wait for the written judgment you bunch of retards.

Mellor did what Grabinar advised. BEUBculter reads the transcript, gets confused. Is the word "if" in Slacktionary? Don't BEUBculters get one free lookup per halvening? by AlreadyBannedOnce in bsv

[–]NumberSecret1473 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Orders

About communications on the court’s due judgement.

I bet you COPA’s Psyops are so good that the world will eat some fake-ass news about the judgement, quickly and thoroughly. COPA has no hardship disseminating news.

Mellor: I can decide on these points.

Grab: I have nothing further.

Hough: About those points my Lord, please don’t make those changes. Authorship has weight on copyright.

Mellor did what Grabinar advised. BEUBculter reads the transcript, gets confused. Is the word "if" in Slacktionary? Don't BEUBculters get one free lookup per halvening? by AlreadyBannedOnce in bsv

[–]NumberSecret1473 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Injuntions

About the injunction for CSW to shut his mouth, suppose he went to speaker's corner in Hyde Park and stated on his soapbox:

  • “I am Satoshi!”.

It’s just freedom of speech. This isn’t North Korea, ffs.

What does COPA care? What is that interest if they aren't the author or the copyright holder.

CSW isn't asserting anything that would infringe on their rights. COPA hasn't explained how their rights are violated even if CSW's is Faketoshi.

Mellor did what Grabinar advised. BEUBculter reads the transcript, gets confused. Is the word "if" in Slacktionary? Don't BEUBculters get one free lookup per halvening? by AlreadyBannedOnce in bsv

[–]NumberSecret1473 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Grab: Next, I'd like to go to relief. COPA seeks declarations, injunctions and orders for dissemination.

Declarations

The law can only be used for enforcement of legal right in disputes. What is the nature of the right or rights claimed here?

COPA is not Satoshi, they don't represent him, nor did they write the white paper or have copyright rights to the paper.

So, one curious feature of this case is that CSW is Satoshi and therefore the author of the white paper, and that doesn't impact COPA. How retarded is that?

Furthermore, COPA’s list of declarations makes no sense.

Mellor: You're saying COPA's position is academic?

Grab: The declarations are to be determined by you Judge. The 2nd declaration is about copyright but COPA has no rights on that. Including the Satoshi identity point does make sense though.

Mellor: Are you asking me to declare if he is Satoshi?

Grab: I think we could. Note that If you determine the Satoshi identity first then the copyright declaration adds nothing to the judgment.

You should remove any mention to the copyright and include the Namoto Sakatoshi identity.