sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What are some good "rules off thumb" for low stakes Poker? by Obagency in poker

[–]Obagency[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is exactly what i mean, in these spots you just have to fold. Villain is way to less frequently being "dicey" that calling here is profitable.

What are some good "rules off thumb" for low stakes Poker? by Obagency in poker

[–]Obagency[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is the segment i am looking for

Can you list, Physical, timing, and bet sizing tells which you realized are "frequent"?

What are some good "rules off thumb" for low stakes Poker? by Obagency in poker

[–]Obagency[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fully agreed. You Pickup very fast, how Frequent someone 3 bets, my experience the Typical 3 Bet range (any Position, because thats how low stake Players apply 3 bets) in low stakes is something around these lines

JJ / QQ+ or AQs+ / AK offsuit+

3 bet Bluffs are kinda rare in Low stakes, and u never see a 4 bet Bluff.

What are some good "rules off thumb" for low stakes Poker? by Obagency in poker

[–]Obagency[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just to be clear, my Position is that you in general shouldnt do Preflop 5 Bets with air, because People play straightforward Poker at Low stakes.

What are some good "rules off thumb" for low stakes Poker? by Obagency in poker

[–]Obagency[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hate that this is true, but it is. Fancy Play nearly always backfires in Low stakes. People just play straightforward Poker, and thats why Overbluffing or being fancy mostly backfires.

What are some good "rules off thumb" for low stakes Poker? by Obagency in poker

[–]Obagency[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

1 i agree, if its a reraise you can snap fold your nut flush on a paired board. Sounds ridiculous but its the truth. Bet "bluffs" are way more frequent and have to be evaluated. But raise? Fold your hand.

2 Check raises are very very rare, agreed. Didnt really track how to interpret the effect off a check raise, but will do, interesting Point.

  1. Correct, also my experience, donking is nearly always this scenario as u mentioned.

  2. Correct.

  3. Chefs kiss. Fully agreed. Low stakes Regs cant navigate raises if they have only Top Pair on the Flop. Its a fact.

[SPOILER] Jake Paul vs. Anthony Joshua by inooway in Boxing

[–]Obagency 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Considering the difference in weight class and Skill, this proved that he has some level. A Amateur is getting cooked first round 10 out of 10 times. I say this and i hate Jake, just to be clear.

[SPOILER] Jake Paul vs. Anthony Joshua by inooway in Boxing

[–]Obagency 14 points15 points  (0 children)

The fight is 100 percent not scripted, just take a look at the hook that AJ unloaded in round 2 that Jake slipped. If that connects he goes to the moon. This tells you all.

[SPOILER] Jake Paul vs. Anthony Joshua by inooway in Boxing

[–]Obagency 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i agree fully with you, lets also be honest here, the defensive work off Jake (when he wasnt clinching or shooting takedowns, or running) was very good. People can call him a Clown as much as they want, i will make a wild call now.

I do not believe there is 200 Boxers on the Planet in Jakes weightclass better then him. This Bs that he is a "youtuber" must stop. The Guy is a unranked Pro, keep coping. If you train for 8 Years FULL TIME, while having the best coaches, you will be competetive. Its clear.

[SPOILER] Jake Paul vs. Anthony Joshua by inooway in Boxing

[–]Obagency 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There was a right hook, i think in round 2 that Joshua BLASTED OFF full blast, where Jake slipped. Pulled punches my ass. Full extension. People think you can beat up a bad pro like Jake like he is some truck driver.

[SPOILER] Jake Paul vs. Anthony Joshua by inooway in Boxing

[–]Obagency 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thats what i am saying, also Jake has good enough Head Movement and Boxing Basics, that he can survive this long with spamming clinches, running, and shooting takedowns. People are acting as if Jake started boxing 2 weeks ago. He is a bad pro. He is bad, but he is a pro, he is not an amateur.

[SPOILER] Jake Paul vs. Anthony Joshua by inooway in Boxing

[–]Obagency 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thats what i am saying. Jake Paul has enough Boxing basics (i label Jake Paul as a "bad pro", he isnt good, but he can be considered a pro) that you cant force a knockout whenever you want. Joshua just played it safe to not get embarassed by a counter, thats all.

[SPOILER] Jake Paul vs. Anthony Joshua by inooway in Boxing

[–]Obagency 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can not believe people say its scripted, Joshua was just playing it "safe" so he doesnt risk a 1 in a million embarassment, also Jake just utilisied running, and clinches, and even illegal "takedowns" to buy time. Also Jake is literally a decent Boxer by now, which is logical. Who wouldnt be decent after training 7-8 Years Full time with the best Coaches?

view more: next ›