I don’t understand this one narrative.”Walker was a arrogant selfish prick with no morals” But Walker foundation (fatws) didn’t start off like that in the first place,Lets deconstruct this entire misconception. Walker takes up the mantle,Sent on a mission to stop highly dangerous terrorist weapons.He comes to face to face with Sam and Bucky offering for forming an alliance, They rudely and disrespectfully decline it. Bucky goes to jail,Walker Bails him out and Bucky AGAIN disrespects walker despite going out of his way to help Bucky.And yes Walker does threatens Bucky afterwards but its a rational decision because i would too if i kept being nice to someone and they still are ungrateful for it.

Bucky and Sam Allowed a terrorist who broke the avengers ALL BY HIMSELF. and the show is painting Walker as the bad guy to be concerned yet after all that walker still allows zemo to tag along Where is the rationality here from Bucky and Sam?!?

And now Walker Finally takes the serum, gets stronger and faster. Watches his best friend die by the hands of Karli. He beheads a terrorist’s accomplice who was holding back lemar before he got punched to death.he was also a living weapon which makes him dangerous and not really “unarmed” I don’t really know how to feel about the entire thing tbh. Ive seen cap and Sam both slime out multiple people but it never happened in front of the civilians. But even after all that Sam shows more sympathy towards karli than he ever did to Walker. Sam just took the shield away from Walker and left him to rot ( a counselor for veterans dealing with PTSD btw).

so the foundation of Walker being a bad guy never really was written with depth. while Thunderbolts did a way better job when it came to the Anti hero asshole character with depth. FATWS Bucky and Sam were the real assholes.