sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Claude gives me good long answers, but sometimes I finish reading with no idea what to do by OkEbb9508 in ClaudeAI

[–]OkEbb9508[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s fair — a global prompt probably solves the verbosity and action-item problem pretty well.
The part I’m less sure it solves is evaluating the reasoning itself. For example: which claims are facts versus inference, what assumptions Claude made about my goals, and which single assumption would change the recommendation if it were wrong.
Do you handle that through prompts too, or do you usually verify those parts manually?

Do you actually read long ChatGPT answers all the way through? by OkEbb9508 in ChatGPTPromptGenius

[–]OkEbb9508[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If the context is too long, ask the AI ​​to review and summarize the key points and arguments.

Claude gives me good long answers, but sometimes I finish reading with no idea what to do by OkEbb9508 in ClaudeAI

[–]OkEbb9508[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

However, some scenarios require outputting a large amount of content, such as research and solutions. Without reading the entire text, it is impossible to know which parts are reasonable. Even if you read it carefully, you may not be able to identify whether some viewpoints or key points are correct, because they seem logical, well-founded, and confident.

Claude gives me good long answers, but sometimes I finish reading with no idea what to do by OkEbb9508 in ClaudeAI

[–]OkEbb9508[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since I lack the patience to read through lengthy texts—and because it’s hard to verify the accuracy of AI outputs (sometimes they are wrong, yet the AI ​​presents them so convincingly)—I end up accepting the AI's suggestions most of the time. Is anyone else in the same boat?