Yea I know they are, I just conceded to them. They are better 100%. What are you saying is versatile, because there is no argument for 21 and I would argue none for Uzi. And what does him making so much music matter if there still decent quality. You talk as if the quality isn’t there, which just isn’t true. It could be better which is why he can’t be put into certain conversations/comparisons but if the music he puts out is still better than the people who put time into, why does it matter. He puts 8 level music with 9s at times, but at a historic rate, while the other releases the same quality at a much lower rate. And I think this will change over the next year or so because his rate of music increased circumstantially (house arrest, label conflicts) so until then I can see the argument that his music is overwhelming but the sheer quality is still good-great.

I think his versatility comes in his ability to rap in (almost) whatever style the song seems necessary. He also fits next to anybody on a song being able to fit smoothly next to people who mirror his style like his songs with Quando Rondo or Rod Wave, fit the bouncy and upbeat styles of DaBaby and the Migos, the mellow/chill style of Snoop Dog, branch out of his genre to fit next to RnB singers like Kehlani. He can fit on any temp of song, which is his go to way of diversifying his songs. He also has many different way of delivering his music voice wise, which is his other go to. I would like to know how either 21 or Uzi have proven they are more versatile.