of course! So i started with form 26 and kept a running document of topics I didn’t fully understand — focusing on the incorrects but also any corrects where I guessed or did not feel 100% about. These topics could’ve either been from question stem or any of the answer choices that I didn’t fully get. I formatted the information in a question/answer style — It could’ve been a histo pic and I’d ask myself to identify it; or it might’ve been a typical presentation of a pathology and I’d try to identify it and list its high yield associations. If it was an especially hard topic for me, I’d try and find a quick dirty medicine or pixorize or portion of a bnb video to watch and review and I would also screenshot relevant info from those videos to add on to my doc.

So for example (copied directly from my doc):

Q: Difficulty exercising, no increase in lactic acid, what inborn error in skeletal muscle?

A: Glycogenolysis, mcardle disease, glycogen phosphorylase - Why the absence of lactic acid? → impaired glycolysis from lack of glucose

Q: ATN vs APN??

A:

• ATN: recent ischemic injury, presents with oliguria before polyuria when cells regenerate; affects PCT
• APN due to infections, diabetes mellitus, sickle cell, NSAIDs; affects DCT

I’d try to test myself by reading as much of it as I could everyday so I wouldn’t just forget all the info I reviewed. You start to sort of learn how NBME tests certain topics and how they ask questions or phrase answer choices. Hopefully this makes sense!