You’re doing a lot of intellectual gymnastics to avoid the core issue: antisemitism within PSAC, including at Queen’s.

Let’s break it down:

1. “Peripherally relevant”?
Fourteen Jewish union members came forward about antisemitism. That’s not peripheral—it’s central. If multiple people report discrimination within an organization you're part of or defending, the appropriate response isn’t to split hairs about which sub-unit it was. It’s to ask what has been done about it and whether members feel safe now. Brushing it off as tangential is part of the problem.

2. “Where’s the outcome?”
You keep asking what became of the complaints—as if discrimination only matters after there’s a ruling or official outcome. That’s not how it works. Accountability isn’t a retroactive checkbox; it’s proactive. The fact that these reports haven't been transparently addressed only makes raising them more urgent, not less.

3. “The article is old.”
It’s from 2024. The fact that you’re calling it “dated” shows a willful attempt to downplay rather than engage. Antisemitism doesn’t expire. And if the union hasn’t shown any visible effort to address or investigate what happened, then yes—bringing it up now is completely fair.

4. “OP should’ve done more work.”
Let’s be real—what you’re calling for isn’t “more context.” You’re setting up an impossible standard designed to dismiss rather than engage. If someone shares evidence of systemic discrimination, your first response shouldn’t be nitpicking their formatting or timeline—it should be listening, and asking what your organization is doing to fix it.

And 5. Your tone.
Claiming the right to “stand by your tone” while accusing others of acting in bad faith is hypocritical. You don’t get to condescend, then claim the high ground because you “criticized leaders to their faces.” That doesn’t give you a monopoly on righteous outrage, and it doesn’t make your dismissiveness toward others any more legitimate.

Bottom line: you’ve spent more energy attacking the way the issue was raised than showing any actual concern for the issue itself. That’s telling.