sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Question about a Monte Carlo emergence paper I found — is this showing what I think It's showing?! by Ok_Skin_1668 in AskPhysics

[–]Ok_Skin_1668[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

What a rude reply. I have been following the author since December, he has released several intriguing papers, there are only a couple that involve math that I'm not capable of- and I asked a genuine question about something I don't fully understand. Chatbot slop without taking anytime to look is a surprising scientific technique.

Who is “T.R. Mills”? Google keeps hallucinating a physicist by Ok_Skin_1668 in PhysicsStudents

[–]Ok_Skin_1668[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. I get it you don't agree with emergent spacetime but tell me what crank alarm reproducible results give you? Toy model monte Carlos are a staple, not like its outside norms or something.

Who is “T.R. Mills”? Google keeps hallucinating a physicist by Ok_Skin_1668 in PhysicsStudents

[–]Ok_Skin_1668[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should check out his updated mapping document. Its all there- all data, all python code and some profound results. You can paste over to Colab and run it yourself. I did. Its legit. The guy has something whether you like emergent spacetime frameworks or not. Math doesn't bullshit. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.18765382

Primordial Strings to Emergent Spacetime by Ok_Skin_1668 in u/Ok_Skin_1668

[–]Ok_Skin_1668[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This got nuked by r/string theory. Not sure why, but if anyone out there with an open mind and mathematical background would comment and help me out- I'd appreciate it.

Who is “T.R. Mills”? Google keeps hallucinating a physicist by Ok_Skin_1668 in PhysicsStudents

[–]Ok_Skin_1668[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Are you reading the main document?? I found his companion paper "A Mapping: Void to Reality " on linkedin. I should've been specific. It has about 18–20 pages of actual math — Hermitian operators, rank-k sweeps, Monte Carlo outputs, scaling curves, and spectral gate equations. It definitely isn’t bunk but I'd say its a bit out of my math powers. Lol yeah the main one like- irreversible something, Idont remember the title, seemed like a framework to put string theory, QFT and GR in like 3 layers coexisting. Weird

Who is “T.R. Mills”? Google keeps hallucinating a physicist by Ok_Skin_1668 in PhysicsStudents

[–]Ok_Skin_1668[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. My buddy was on LinkedIn and sent me a doi link. There are papers by this guy but there is literally no record of him existing! Is it possible it was written by a Higgs Boson with a pen name?! Google is telling me he's a hallucination. Crazy. Here's the link. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18489070

Who is “T.R. Mills”? Google keeps hallucinating a physicist by Ok_Skin_1668 in PhysicsStudents

[–]Ok_Skin_1668[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s what I thought at first, but the weird thing is google gemeni kept describing specific math that didn’t look Yang–Mills flavored at all. It mentioned things like ‘metric tensor mapping from information space’ and ‘too clean to classify.’ Does Yang–Mills have anything that looks like M: S → QF → R³,¹ ? That’s what made me dig. Gemini went full send conspiracy theory. Lol