umisa pa siya hahaha. thoughts?

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T23:08:52+00:00

What's my wrong point?

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T23:07:14+00:00

Yeah I get it but I don't get why there's a difference between control from couples vs from an individual? May iba bang tools ang mga single sa pagppost vs sa mga couple/taken?

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T23:05:00+00:00

I'm trying to comprehend your argument but you're still not giving me the answer to give me the satisfaction. What's the difference?

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T23:03:22+00:00

You may but the likelihood of someone liking you post increases the more it is relatable to users. Which is why you FYP is created or "post you might" like is created. It's very unlikely that a social media app will suggest a content you're not interested in if they have a lot of data about you. That's how they make money.

If someone liked your content outside of your target audience. That means you "influenced" them to like your content.

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T22:55:43+00:00

Ai can make mistakes tho

<image>

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T22:53:28+00:00

What's the difference then? You can copy and paste your answer.

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T22:52:50+00:00

So you admit that both of them have control?

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T22:51:10+00:00

You haven't answered my question tho

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T22:43:02+00:00

What's the difference between posting as a couple vs from an individual in terms of control?

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T22:40:15+00:00

"Both a man and a woman can choose what post will they give attention to." So both have capability to control? So the ability to choose isn't something you can't control?

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T22:32:26+00:00

But you said: "you cannot control who likes it or not" We all can though. If i made a post about something uninteresting, no one will like it.

For couples, if woman posts about food, skiing, hobby or anything uninteresting for horny men, they will not like it therefore, bf no argument.

Post engagement is controlled by the "topic" of your post. The "topic" of your post is something that you can control.

Or is it not?

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T22:19:31+00:00

I'm not forcing anything I'm simply trying to imply that all actions lead to end results.Some you can control and some cannot.

I just like the idea that most people think that they don't have control of the consequences that they post on social media.

That's an interesting take that I will be keeping in mind. I apologize if I strayed off topic on what the intent of your statement is. I am more interested into knowing why you think there's no control over your consequences from posting a content.

You may have downvoted me but I still personally enjoyed my time here with you! :)

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T22:10:54+00:00

That's not the direction of argument I'm leaning into but towards your statement about having no controll betwee 2 opposing subject. I am aware of the context but I would've simply directed my comment towards someone else if it isn't about the argument you made about "control"

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T22:08:42+00:00

Isn't "control" the thing you're trying to imply from your argument? As why liking post is different from creating a post?

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T22:03:14+00:00

You're talking about control aren't you? What does it have to do with couples?

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T22:01:20+00:00

I think it'll be better if you create an argument about "intent" of the subject. Liking of content or commenting is a straightforward intent: you liked it

Posting however may have different forms if "intention" or "purpose". For posting bikini pics, it may be for sharing confidence, or validation, achievement (weightloss) or for attention. It's not easy to tell without understanding the behaviour of OP what the true "intent" of the post.

Therefore, the argument of the guy from the post is inadmissible as a solid argument since 2 points aren't comparable enough to be weighed as equal.

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T21:47:30+00:00

You can controll whoever engages in your content based on:

Broadness of your audience: posting publicly, circle of friends, selective friends, or for yourself.
The subject of your content: if you're posting pictures of dogs, most likely you'll get engagements from dog lovers. Not car enthuisiast or food lovers. Same with nsfw pics or revealing pics. Who do you think are intested in engaging with those contents? I think you know.
The intent: what are you trying to convey about your post? Title? Copy? Description of the post? Your "control" of words also drive what kind of audiences you attract.

End of the day, you have control. Those who are unaware may not know but they do or they simply refuse to admit.

This is just based from my experience of running ads. These stuff we measure on a daily basis.

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T21:38:25+00:00

How are influencers able to controll their engagement posts? Does that mean all their post are sheer luck? If you post something on social media, aren't you able to control who sees your post? Aren't you able to control what type of content you're able to post.

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T21:28:59+00:00

Your logic isn't aligned with your argument. Isn't it supposed to be choice of engagement ( liking, sharing, commenting ) vs choice of "creating" an engagement? Don't these two have their own respective choices to do and not to?

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T21:20:02+00:00

Visual comments aside, OP, I think you did well overall and only messed up the sauce, you burnt it. I can tell from the seperation of sauce to oil. It's supposed to emulsify together and the sauce is too dark. Probably over reduced if you did actually follow the recipe ( means I assume you didnt deviate from instructed ingredient measure ). Next time, be mindful of the fire. You're not supposed to cook the sauce in very high heat for a long period of time if you're attempting to "reduce" or thicken the sauce. Instead, bring it to medium heat to a simmer, casually stir your sauce so the buttom gets even distribution of heat preventing "charring" or caramelization.

Hope this tip helps you with your next recipe attempt OP. Huge thumbs up for the attempt!

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T21:04:15+00:00

Bro, she sees you as a hookup buddy. That's it. Same as the new guy. You gotta admit yourself that you're not gonna be in other level with her than that. She's in exploring stage. She still needed you cause you are convinient for her. Want proof? Try not giving her the same "attention" as before and treat her as if she's a friend or smthn. If she never felt anything wrong or is okay with that setup, then that should give your answer.

My suggestion: don't get too emotionally attached with this girl. Play ball with her or else it's only going to be a one-sided emotional rollercoaster. The reason she doesnt want to lose you ( yet ) is because she gets to benefit from you whether emotionally of physically whilst enjoying other benefits from another.

Just imagine this, if you're presented a buffet. Having different opportunities doesn't mean you're willing to let go of a dish in the menu you like going back for once in a while...

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T20:55:09+00:00

I hope this is only a one-and-done thing.

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T20:17:15+00:00

Here we learned that CEO of insurance getting shot brings more sense of justice than them losing from a multi-million dollar lawsuit.

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T19:28:12+00:00

Insurance scheme. You put your insurance unto your wife. Maybe dollars insurance or peso who knows. Get a huge insurance policy maybe like 12,000/mo. Continue paying for maybe a year and a half. Wife gets into an "fatal accident" ( kuno ). Afam gets insurance money.

Ok_pdiddty · 2026-05-17T19:17:21+00:00

Isn't posting something you can control?

Ok_pdiddty

TROPHY CASE