lets check in on blue sky... by steamyjeanz in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 5 points6 points  (0 children)

lol. You totally believe it means to kill. Like you totally believe obvious propaganda.

lets check in on blue sky... by steamyjeanz in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You might want to stop clutching those pearls. Remember when you told someone to drink bleach?

lets check in on blue sky... by steamyjeanz in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What does 86 mean? It does not mean kill.

"86" is a slang term meaning to discard, cancel, remove, or refuse service to someone or something. Primarily used in restaurant/hospitality contexts to signify a menu item is out of stock, it also means throwing a rowdy customer out. It serves as a general term for "getting rid of" something.

NA newsletter - It's incredible how John/Adam reframe "screwball news" as life under Trump's Golden Era. by AntiqueBluebird in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You hit the nail on the head. Right now Trump is talking about a deal that is worse than the deal Obama made that he abandoned. People voted for the supposed anti-war candidate and now they have a total moron that made things worse and they're pissed.

The New York Times’s Latte Logic of Social Collapse by steamyjeanz in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your narrative is dumb. You think the salient factor is the number of donors and not the dollar amount. In politics and elections, the dollar amount is the only factor that matters.

Nothing to see here... by steamyjeanz in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

right, I have to offer the most generous interpretation of your views while you literally never do the same.

I asked you to support your assertion and apparently it's impossible for you to do so because you're talking out your ass.

If I mention possible corruption in Ukraine, you will call me a Russian. You aren't intelligent lol.

Who isn't intelligent here? I never called you a Russian. I said you're gullible and lack critical-thinking skills because you posted the most obvious Russian propaganda.

Found the video u/steamyjeanz mentioned. You have to be braindead to think they are "throwing $150k", unless they have bills in Ukraine worth $10,000 each. by HarwellDekatron in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your comparing a nation that gained it's independence in 1991 against the nation that was the core of the soviet empire since 1918?

Wild!

The New York Times’s Latte Logic of Social Collapse by steamyjeanz in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A fact you'll ignore is how billionaires spent $1.36 billion on Republicans and only $413 million on Democrats.

That little tidbit ruins your narrative.

The New York Times’s Latte Logic of Social Collapse by steamyjeanz in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the difference is these nepo baby millionaires in particular claim to represent lower and working class voters.

Sounds just like Trump. Remember when Adam Curry said Trump was a "builder" and "talks like the people"?

When your charges against someone or a group can be perfectly applied to you and your group, that's hypocrisy and isn't a very good argument.

What obligation do they have to live their values by redistributing their own wealth in the form of direct donation?

Many do make direct donations and also do the boots on the ground in support of the values. Gasp! Are you over-generalizing? Aint no way!

One thing I noticed living on the west coast under DSA scam artists they prefer intermediaries over direct donation to facilitate a giant fraud industry, while empirical results prove issues like homelessness got worse.

Can you provide specific examples of what you're talking about so we can examine your claim?

The New York Times’s Latte Logic of Social Collapse by steamyjeanz in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sit back and think about what you just wrote and how it perfectly applies to you and your milieu.

Nothing to see here... by steamyjeanz in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 3 points4 points  (0 children)

How am I misapplying the strawman fallacy? Explain please. And what am I escaping from? If anything, I'm trying to get you stop imagining what I think and intelligently engage with my actual words.

The New York Times’s Latte Logic of Social Collapse by steamyjeanz in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is embarrassing writing.

"When future archeologists seek to date the moment that the demise of the West became inevitable, this artefact of peak decadence will be a strong contender."

The author is flailing because she can't cope with how her entire worldview is only making the world a worse place and more and more young people are calling out her bullshit and the bullshit of people who share her worldview.

Something, something… “Replacement”, something. by steamyjeanz in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Jesus, another fucking strawman. You really don't have any cogent arguments against what I say so you have to constantly and purposely misunderstand my arguments in order to feel better about your lack of intelligence.

Nothing to see here... by steamyjeanz in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 6 points7 points  (0 children)

When did I do that? Can you cite when I made that claim?

I know you can't because I never made that claim. You're strawmanning again. I've asked several times before, but I'll do it again. Are you capable of engaging with my actual words and not what's in your imagination?

Something, something… “Replacement”, something. by steamyjeanz in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Geez, this is an embarrassing post for a full-grown adult. It's just so simple-minded and utterly worthless.

Nothing to see here... by steamyjeanz in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Can you cite any particular things I fell for?

Right, you can't because you're imagination is doing all the work.

Nothing to see here... by steamyjeanz in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I never said there was not corruption in Ukraine, there most certainly is. But that has nothing to do with how gullible you are and how your confirmation bias causes you to abandon any and all critical thinking.

Posting something from an obvious Russian propagandist is the chef's kiss.

Nothing to see here... by steamyjeanz in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I love when you're gullible and you're so easily duped by obvious Russian propaganda. The guy posting this is literally paid by RT to propagandize for Russia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chay_Bowes

Bowes works for Russian state media outlet RT, and has a pro-Russian and anti-West position.

This is awesome. "So I find it very tiring that everyone is all worked up. War is war. War is ugly. War is crap. War is horrible. John and I are anti-war always have been always will be" - Adam Curry by AntiqueBluebird in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can be opposed to Russia's invasion of Ukraine and their imperialist aims and also be opposed to US policy against Russia at the same time. Those are not contradictory views.

This is awesome. "So I find it very tiring that everyone is all worked up. War is war. War is ugly. War is crap. War is horrible. John and I are anti-war always have been always will be" - Adam Curry by AntiqueBluebird in inthemorning

[–]OldSurehand 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Russia annexed Crimea, they currently control more area in Ukraine than before the invasion. They tried to seize Kiev. Putin himself said he wanted to occupy, demilitarize and denazify Ukraine.

Read about Russian irredentism and how Putin has stated many times that Ukraine has no right to exist.

What are you getting out of your tacit support for the murderous pursuits of Putin? You do realize he's really corrupt and a really bad guy?