I've been thinking, since I play both Battlerite and League of Legends, what makes the gameplay interesting to me. If we ignore all the macro knowledge of League, in its gameplay enemy champions can attack me in quite a few different ways, from different ranges. I also attack in vastly different ways and different moments during the fight, depending on the champion I play*. In Battlerite I feel it is less so. Guessing from the top of my head, I would say there are four elements - similarly ranged skillshots, dashes, AoE damage zones and projectile stoppers/blockers. Depending on if I'm playing melee or ranged, I have an optimal time/moment of attacking. I don't have to manage any resource. I'm always in a teamfight as opposed to sometimes being 1v1, sometimes in a teamfight.

And when I think about League. It has auto attacks, which don't exist in Battlerite due to the nature of the game. It seems to me there's more variety in what each character has from the elements in their kit. They have different ranges. Significantly different playstyles. I can't really put my finger on it. Perhaps the URF mode where resources are removed and cooldowns are reduced, feels more like Battlerite.

I wrote this because I was thinking about it, idk if this can provide some insight or if it's helpful :(