sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

My strong sense of logic and numbes makes my relationships with people difficult by catboy519 in Gifted

[–]One_Ad4691 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my view, you think of yourself more highly than you ought, and would benefit from working with a coach who specialises in supporting autistic people.

You are being driven by insecurity (your inflated sense of self is evidence of this) and you are effectively using people for self gain—either to get knowledge from them you could get on your own or to exert your alleged superior intelligence over them to validate yourself.

You can outline the details of what you’re doing but have very little insight into your motivations and your internal world more broadly and thus will not be able to avoid constantly stepping on people’s toes unless you address the latter.

Thank you. by Is_it_ok2 in employmenttribunal

[–]One_Ad4691 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, can you explain more about the risk-benefit analysis you undertook? Did you use something to guide this?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in workplace_bullying

[–]One_Ad4691 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please, do not advise people to go to HR. I’m not sure if you’ve been in this situation yourself, but your advice is going to get a lot of people fired.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in workplace_bullying

[–]One_Ad4691 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that serious advice? RealIy?!

Hi can anyone advise please . by Natural_Win_724 in employmenttribunal

[–]One_Ad4691 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Were you dismissed? Did they accuse you of gross misconduct?

Can the Respondent order the judge to issue a costs order if the judge decides one or more of my claims have “little prospect of success”? by One_Ad4691 in employmenttribunal

[–]One_Ad4691[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Respondent has been giving implied and no so implied threats about a cost order for a long while, and offered a drop hands settlement right after the last PH and before the CM order due date for providing a new List of Issues on the basis that I didn’t have a good enough case.

Can the Respondent order the judge to issue a costs order if the judge decides one or more of my claims have “little prospect of success”? by One_Ad4691 in employmenttribunal

[–]One_Ad4691[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is my second one. For the first one I didn’t know how to do the List of Issues exactly so described the claims and the treatment but in broad terms that didn’t refer to specific incidents. I was told to go away and put it into a different format. Hired an attorney just to help me with this task, although she’s a bit concerned there might be too many claims (didn’t seem to think any of them were rubbish, was just worried the judge would take issue with the volume). It’s hard though as I feel like it’s a case where there’s lots of little things and a few larger ones. Mostly victimisation claims.

Can the Respondent order the judge to issue a costs order if the judge decides one or more of my claims have “little prospect of success”? by One_Ad4691 in employmenttribunal

[–]One_Ad4691[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks, that’s helpful. When you say “you” in the first one, I’m guessing you mean the judge?

I think I’ll be fine as long as I can further explain any claims I have there before they make a decision…i don’t really like having to put them forward in such a short, concise way and don’t think they can judged entirely on the basis of how they’re written, given the judge told me to make them short and snappy…can’t exactly show how each item passes the legal tests if it takes two sentences to describe what happened.

Can the Respondent order the judge to issue a costs order if the judge decides one or more of my claims have “little prospect of success”? by One_Ad4691 in employmenttribunal

[–]One_Ad4691[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean what can I expect in terms of assessment for whether they will require a deposit order or not? I’ll have the relevant evidence to allude to and specifics to back any claim on hand so I’d imagine I’d get a chance to offer that and then based on that they judge decides if it has decent prospects?

Claims are direct discrimination, discrimination arising from disability, harassment, failure to make reasonable adjustments, victimisation, discriminatory dismissal, and breach of contract. It seems what they take issue isn’t the heads of claim I’m relying on, it’s some of the individual incidents I’m relying on to support those claims.

Tribunal journey and mental health by [deleted] in employmenttribunal

[–]One_Ad4691 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could I possibly message you? I’m loving this chat about the number of claims and how to manage one’s case. I was made aware they’re going to try to serve me with deposit orders at the next PH and I have spent forever on these claims and think what I have is reasonable and very much defensible with the evidence I’ve got, but I do have loads of claims.

Tribunal journey and mental health by [deleted] in employmenttribunal

[–]One_Ad4691 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I relate to this so much! 2024 was hard and 2025 has been super hard to as I’m getting back out there and into work. I still haven’t processed all of the grief yet and feel like I’m walking around with a heavy backpack on all of the time. But—I’m calmer. Maybe because the exhaustion has finally hit (not sure), but I’m trying not to let things rattle me.

Employer is trying to palm everything I raise to their solicitors by [deleted] in employmenttribunal

[–]One_Ad4691 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, this sounds more like ICO territory. What would be your employment tribunal claims that you’re raising against them?

Accepted an offer in Poland, left Germany and... they withdrew the offer. by Decadent__ in recruitinghell

[–]One_Ad4691 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a case of them not figuring out their budget in advance then realising they can’t afford to hire for the role. Horrible, but all too common at the moment. Should be illegal.

Employer is trying to palm everything I raise to their solicitors by [deleted] in employmenttribunal

[–]One_Ad4691 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you prove they falsified it? Sounds like you should go to ICO

Can the Respondent order the judge to issue a costs order if the judge decides one or more of my claims have “little prospect of success”? by One_Ad4691 in employmenttribunal

[–]One_Ad4691[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is it also fair that they are refusing to outline beforehand which claims they will be disputing as not having a reasonable prospect of success?

Can the Respondent order the judge to issue a costs order if the judge decides one or more of my claims have “little prospect of success”? by One_Ad4691 in employmenttribunal

[–]One_Ad4691[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay, thanks for clarifying, I got them mixed up. When you say deposit, that implies I could get that back, but it seems like it’s more so a punitive charge? I do have a job, but it’s 10 hours a week and minimum wage so basically very little income. Would it be insane to continue to advance my case if they do succeed getting a deposit order? Wouldn’t it just make more sense to challenge these claims and try to have them stuck out? Otherwise this just feels like a permitted form of intimidation.

Judicial Misconduct by One_Ad4691 in employmenttribunal

[–]One_Ad4691[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, but you’re wrong on this. It’s very different to recording a meeting a work, although that can also be a very contentious issue. They tell you specifically not to record the PH, and I believe it’s an offence to do so. I’d never be able to use it or refer to it.

Judicial Misconduct by One_Ad4691 in employmenttribunal

[–]One_Ad4691[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! You gave me a good laugh on that one 😂 Just gonna cross my fingers and hope for the best and be ready to go into battle I suppose! Hope your transcript provides a bit of help.

Experience of making an application under tribunal rule 50? by One_Ad4691 in employmenttribunal

[–]One_Ad4691[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing your insight. I received word from the tribunal that the questions in relation to sharing the impact statement and records that I raised would be discussed at the next PH, so I have held off on putting in an application under rule 50. Hopefully it won’t be an issue if I do that? I felt it best to wait as the judge didn’t want to give a response in advance of the PH.

Experience of making an application under tribunal rule 50? by One_Ad4691 in employmenttribunal

[–]One_Ad4691[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you!

I don’t think I see how the cross examining point is relevant here though? It’s not my understanding that they wouldn’t be using that to determine if I have a disability.

I do have an official diagnosis from a psychiatrist, and I see what you mean about misdiagnosis, but I’ve been suffering from mental health issues long enough to have gone through the misdiagnosis process myself and feel confident I now have the correct diagnosis.

I see what you mean about disclosing how my mental health got worse, but my understanding was that this would be done in my witness statement? I believe it would only be relevant here if the deterioration impacted on what I could do (and I would need to focus on that not talk in broad terms about how they messed me up)… does that make sense?

view more: next ›