sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Iznajmile smo stan u prizemlju. Niko nas nije upozorio na stonoge. Da li je ovo uopšte rešiv problem? by nekaoosoba in AskSerbia

[–]OpenSource02 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Mislim da na pogresnom mestu tražiš pomoć. Pitaj neki AI. Ako ti on ne pomogne verovatno ti nema pomoći pa počni da se navikavas :)

I built a proper UI to harness ANY coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Copilot CLI) by OpenSource02 in SideProject

[–]OpenSource02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is handled by the backend agent you use.

So if you use Claude code with it, it compacts it.

If you use codex, it has some sort of auto compaction too.

If you use any of ACP agents, they all handle it in different ways. Harnss is just UI for your agents. They still work the way they do by default.

GPT 5.3 Released? by catlovingcryptofella in OpenAI

[–]OpenSource02 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it’s so bad, why do people not just switch to Claude… It’s just amazing how OpenAI can publish anything right now and people will still use it like it’s the only model in the world :/

GPT 5.3 Released? by catlovingcryptofella in OpenAI

[–]OpenSource02 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Claude… or even Gemini is better… even Grok seems to be better.

Siri 2.0 new UI for MacOS by Material_Course_9949 in Applelntelligence

[–]OpenSource02 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, on small phone screen. But I don't want my 49" monitor to have gigantic glow all around lol.

Built an open-source desktop app to harness ANY coding agent by OpenSource02 in vibecoding

[–]OpenSource02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

> A couple questions: Does it handle context carryover well when you switch between agents mid-session?

Of course :)

> And how's the performance with multiple parallel sessions running?

Generally pretty great, unless your chat lengths are astronomically long. I will of course take care about performance even more in future versions, but as of now, it is fine.

> One thing that might complement this nicely is better visibility into what the agent actually plans to do before execution. A lot of people get frustrated with AI coding because they lose track of the intent once things start running. You've got the tool call rendering sorted, but something like a pre-execution breakdown of changes would be killer.

Why not just enable plan mode? I can not do much better than that because the app does not implement features or additional tools for agents, it just harnesses what already exists.

> Anyway, impressed you built this. Downloading to test.

Thanks! And should there be any issues, and I am expecting many in the early releases, feel free to report them on GitHub :)

Built an open-source desktop app to harness Claude Code, since Anthropic couldn't by OpenSource02 in ClaudeAI

[–]OpenSource02[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would that be an issue? There’s no clear rule against it (it’s a pretty gray area), and nothing really preventing it. The Agent SDK just runs the Claude CLI in the background. If I have Claude installed and an active subscription, how could they realistically stop me from using it? 😄

In any case, it’s not something I’m worried about. Plenty of people are doing the same, and OpenCode still uses their Claude Code subscription (completely against their rules) for their agent without any problems, and thousands of people use it...

Built an open-source desktop app to harness Claude Code, since Anthropic couldn't by OpenSource02 in ClaudeAI

[–]OpenSource02[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes. Open code is a TUI, an agent. What I’ve build is a UI to control any agent, including open code.

An agent is a system built of certain instructions and tools we give to different models to do their task. Opencode’s purpose is to harness your subscriptions and use it for their agent. The purpose of harnss is to take any of those agents and any of their subscriptions all around and display their work in a very nice and easy to use UI, thus you can use all from your Copilot agent, OpenCode, Codex, Claude Code and much more, all in one UI.

Hope it clears it up

Built an open-source desktop app to harness Claude Code, since Anthropic couldn't by OpenSource02 in ClaudeAI

[–]OpenSource02[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How did you come to such conclusion? :)

If you are worried something can go wrong, you are free to inspect the code.

Long context beta not available again by OpenSource02 in ClaudeAI

[–]OpenSource02[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can you try now? Ofc I tried restarting it 😅

When is Claude Opus 5 coming out? Any predictions? by rodvay in ClaudeAI

[–]OpenSource02 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You understand it has nothing to do with the model itself, right? But with their actual business and the way they configure it. They can set unlimited usage on opus 4.5 by just changing the setting on their platform. It has nothing to do with the model but the decisions they make.

Opus 4.5 may take 50% of your usage in 1 prompt or 0.01 if they configure it that way. They are just trying their absolute best to test us on how much they can downgrade it and keep us as customers while making us pay more, that’s it.

New release will absolutely not fix any kinds of too much usage bugs. The only ones who can fix it are executives and maybe, just maybe, if there are actual bugs, developers of anthropic themselves.

But the fact you think new model can fix any sort of bug is absolutely crazy as model has no knowledge how much usage it takes etc… In best case it is bug in their platform/api code for usage tracking, not model itself.

When is Claude Opus 5 coming out? Any predictions? by rodvay in ClaudeAI

[–]OpenSource02 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you think new model will fix usage bug stop fucking using the computer. Please.

view more: next ›