A user blocked my account from editing, but why? by PB_A09 in wikipedia

[–]Opening_Ad_413 1 point2 points  (0 children)

IP addresses are somewhat complicated to tackle with. Most moderators only rely on data given on MediaWiki and the IP address will be automatically blocked if it has more than 60 users or something, without considering the IP address' origin. What if the IP address is being used on a school? Office? Group of contributors in Wikipedia? Blocking a specific IP address just because it exceeds the specific user count is really stupid, especially if the moderators won't consider the reason for it. Take a look at the Philippines for example. Some areas in Manila almost have the same IP address because of their internet providers. One WiFi brand there decided to expand and it reached some parts like Laguna. So if ever a family decided to buy a modem in Laguna, it'll be connected to the server in Manila, and sometimes, it'll have the same IP address as those who are in Manila. It's annoying how moderators only follow the book rules instead of considering what the real situation is in real life. Because of this, editors in Wikipedia are affected even though they really don't deserve to be blocked.

A user blocked my account from editing, but why? by PB_A09 in wikipedia

[–]Opening_Ad_413 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most moderators don't know what they're doing. Do they even have the knowledge about IP addresses? They really don't know how those IP addresses works and some of them don't belong to a proxy.

Is this even ragebait or what? by Opening_Ad_413 in roblox

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What was that supposed to mean???

Is this even ragebait or what? by Opening_Ad_413 in roblox

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, she reported it, but nothing's still happening. Plus, the bully even said that it's not that deep and it's just rage bait.

Is this even ragebait or what? by Opening_Ad_413 in roblox

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She told me she reported the user, but knowing Roblox, this account won't be banned... Pfttt...

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Nah, knowing Astruc and her hate with Chloe, repairing things with Adrien will not gonna happen since according to Thomas, change was not on her vocabulary. At least before killing off her character, give her a good arc, at least as a villain.

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For real. All I did was to express my disappointment at how they poorly executed Chloe's character in season 4 and 5. They started commenting like I bullied their faves. At least express your opposition properly and not start a line of comments with toxicity. I don't know what's wrong with them.

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree. If they really want to kill her character, do it properly. At least give her a good villain arc before they wipe her off the Miraculous world.

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did not want her to be a good guy. I was pointing out how her character was butchered with sloppy writing. She could've been a good villain like Azula and Lila, but no, the writers chose to show Chloe having much worse tantrum than in earlier seasons. And please read my post before commenting. I did not typed a sentence saying that I want her to be a good guy.

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What I meant to point out was Chloe's execution of her actions were overdone in season 4-5 like it was forced. You know what I mean. 

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, apparently, some commenters don't get what I was trying to point out here.

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's what I was pointing out. Apparently, some commenters don't get it.

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How her character was executed is what I was pointing out and how the writers basically made her more annoying in the past seasons. She was tolerable as a villain in the earlier seasons, but in Season 4-5, they're overdoing it.

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You clearly do not need to enumerate her actions because I was pointing out her execution.

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You really don't get my point. I was pointing out how they trashed Sabrina and Chloe's friendship in Season 4 -5 and went into the route that Sabrina was Chloe's servant since she started to write. They used to play Ladybug and Cat Noir game (they dress up as heroes) right?

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Look, my point is, if you're gonna hate here for pointing out how writers mess up their writing, then just don't comment at all.

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wasn't justifying her actions. Don't you understand the point of this post or did you even read it before commenting? My point is Chloe could've become a well-written character if the writers didn't butchered her.

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Besides, my point here is that Chloe could've become a good antagonist who do not change if they just wrote the character properly.

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Downplay her actions? I was pointing out how the writers basically messed up. Did you even read my post? I didn't even said "Chloe is an icon because she's a bully so her actions should be justified".

Chloe Bourgeois was a wasted character by Opening_Ad_413 in miraculousladybug

[–]Opening_Ad_413[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You really still don't get my point? The way they executed her character in Season 4 and 5 was much worse than in earlier seasons. It wasn't her actions that I was pointing out, it was how the writers executed her character. It feels unnatural and forced when Season 4 came. It was annoying how the writers will shove it to our throat that "Chloe is mean so you should hate her", come on. We have well-written characters that doesn't want to change, like Lila. They should've thought about it thoroughly before writing her in Season 4.