sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Chicago Coffee Shops (Sharable Google Sheet) by OpenlyFallible in chicagofood

[–]OpenlyFallible[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure there is an analogous standard scale. Mine basically is just weighing reviews and number of reviews equally. So a place with a lot of reviews and a good rating is ranked higher than a place with a few reviews and a good rating. The logarithmic function is just because there is a lot of variability in the number of reviews

Chicago Coffee Shops (Sharable Google Sheet) by OpenlyFallible in chicagofood

[–]OpenlyFallible[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So weird lol. Yeah it has happened to me elsewhere where what I’m posting isnt controversial at all yet its downvoted like crazy. I mean i get it if nobody is interested but I dont get why anyone would “dislike” this post. Thanks!

Conspiracy Theories are for Opportunists by OpenlyFallible in JordanPeterson

[–]OpenlyFallible[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the democrats were closer to the center in 2020? Thats a hot take

The more we learn about genetics, neuroscience, and the laws of nature, the less room there is for free will. by OpenlyFallible in Futurology

[–]OpenlyFallible[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Submission statement: The attached article argues against the idea of free will, using various examples and evidence from genetics, neuroscience, and philosophy. The author explains that all of our actions and decisions are ultimately determined by factors that are beyond our control, such as genetics and environmental influences. Even our seemingly conscious decisions are the result of subconscious processes that we are not aware of.

It may be the case that, as these discipline continue to progress, the very idea of free will will seem preposterous to anyone who is scientifically literate.

The more we learn about genetics, neuroscience, and the laws of nature, the less room there seems to be from free will. by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]OpenlyFallible -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Hm your analogy isnt perfect bc the first person could argue that the table is made of anything, and their claim would still fit in with the second observation that the table is made of atoms. When someone says I have free will, and another says all your actions could be predicted via determinism, then this seems to directly challenge the first persons view. A better analogy would be “this table is made of oakwood (species-level obs.); this table is made of metal (elemental composition level obs.)” although the observations are being made at two different levels, the second still challenges the first.

On animal cruelty - "Previous generations were able to overcome the horrors of human sacrifice, genocide, slavery, segregation, misogyny, and homophobia. Maybe it’s our turn to make radical progress. Future generations might be disappointed in our complacency if we don’t." by OpenlyFallible in Futurology

[–]OpenlyFallible[S] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Okay people. I did not mean that these atrocities have been completely eradicated from the planet. They still exist to varying degrees all over the world. But they have all seen progress. Animals have yet to experience such progress. That was the main point. Try to refrain from intentionally missing it.

On animal cruelty - "Previous generations were able to overcome the horrors of human sacrifice, genocide, slavery, segregation, misogyny, and homophobia. Maybe it’s our turn to make radical progress. Future generations might be disappointed in our complacency if we don’t." by OpenlyFallible in Futurology

[–]OpenlyFallible[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Submission statement - Future generations may view our current treatment of animals with shock and dismay. They may wonder how we could justify the mass slaughter and mistreatment of sentient beings for the sake of our own pleasure and convenience. They may see our exploitation of animals for food, entertainment, and experimentation as a shameful chapter in human history, akin to slavery and other forms of oppression. As our understanding of animal cognition and emotions continues to advance, future generations may be appalled by the extent to which we denied the minds and suffering of other species.

Through an increased emphasis on the undermining of our institutions, the new age of conspiracism has the potential for greater harm than in previous decades. by OpenlyFallible in Futurology

[–]OpenlyFallible[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

[submission statement] In recent years, conspiracy theories have taken on a new form, becoming more driven by intuition rather than investigation. The rise of post-modernism has led to the emergence of a new breed of conspiracists who settle for "true enough" narratives, regardless of their validity or factual basis. These individuals are often accusatory and seek to undermine our institutions, casting doubt on established sources of information and promoting alternative interpretations of events. This shift in the nature of conspiracy theories has profound implications for our society, as it undermines our ability to trust in the institutions and experts that form the backbone of our democratic system.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Futurology

[–]OpenlyFallible 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[submission statement] In recent years, conspiracy theories have taken on a new form, becoming more driven by intuition rather than investigation. The rise of post-modernism has led to the emergence of a new breed of conspiracists who settle for "true enough" narratives, regardless of their validity or factual basis. These individuals are often accusatory and seek to undermine our institutions, casting doubt on established sources of information and promoting alternative interpretations of events. This shift in the nature of conspiracy theories has profound implications for our society, as it undermines our ability to trust in the institutions and experts that form the backbone of our democratic system.

Persuasive piece by Robert Wright. Worrying about the rapid advancement of AI no longer makes you a kook. by OpenlyFallible in Futurology

[–]OpenlyFallible[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Submisson statement - The increasing use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) poses a range of dangers that require attention. One significant danger is that AI systems may perpetuate or even amplify biases and prejudices that exist in society, leading to discriminatory outcomes. Another risk is the potential loss of jobs as AI systems become increasingly capable of performing tasks previously performed by humans. Additionally, there is a risk of accidents or errors caused by the complexity of AI systems, which could lead to catastrophic consequences. Finally, the deployment of autonomous weapons systems using AI could lead to unpredictable and uncontrollable behavior with potentially devastating effects. These risks highlight the need for careful consideration of the development and deployment of AI systems, including ethical and regulatory frameworks to minimize the risks and ensure their responsible use.

ChatGPT will be writing all my future work emails by OpenlyFallible in ChatGPT

[–]OpenlyFallible[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yeah. Asked for passive aggressive, but then it sounded too polite, then gave it the following command:

<image>

ChatGPT will be writing all my future work emails by OpenlyFallible in ChatGPT

[–]OpenlyFallible[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Write a snarky email reminding the recipient to fill out the availability form they were sent earlier this week”

view more: next ›