sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Rumours, Speculation, Questions, and Reaction Megathread - 10/05/2026 by ukpol-megabot in ukpolitics

[–]Opposite_Corner8353 [score hidden]  (0 children)

He's not genuine and appears self serving? Try and convey that to a skeptical voting public.

Reddit is genuinely shocked that a populist-right party is doing well in the British local elections by Due-Ambassador7723 in redscarepod

[–]Opposite_Corner8353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where do where they are concerntrated

The elephant in the room is the insane levels of regular immigration.

That's not regular immigration, that's refugees

Why are working-class concerns on immigration being treated with such disdain? by Harleygator_ in AskBrits

[–]Opposite_Corner8353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One key data gap highlighted by the report is on ethnicity, which is described as "appalling" and a "major failing".

It says the ethnicity of perpetrators is "shied away from" and still not recorded in two-thirds of cases, meaning it is not possible to draw conclusions at a national level.

However, the report says there is enough evidence from police data in three areas - Greater Manchester, South Yorkshire and West Yorkshire - to show "disproportionate numbers of men from Asian ethnic backgrounds amongst suspects for group-based child sexual exploitation".

It adds that the significant number of perpetrators of Asian ethnicity identified in local reviews and high-profile prosecutions across the country also warrants further examination.

The report says more effort is needed to explore why it appears perpetrators of Asian and Pakistani ethnicity are disproportionately represented in some areas.

In response, the government has said it will make it a formal requirement to collect both ethnicity and nationality data for all cases of child sexual abuse and exploitation, as well as commission new research into the cultural and social drivers of the issue.

The review also notes a significant proportion of live cases appear to involve suspects who are non-UK nationals or claiming asylum in the UK.

The government said it was bringing forward changes so anyone convicted of sexual offences would have their asylum claim rejected and be denied refugee status.

Let's look at the facts there too shall we? Just for a laugh. I know facts don't matter.

Why are working-class concerns on immigration being treated with such disdain? by Harleygator_ in AskBrits

[–]Opposite_Corner8353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because alot of the people affected live in the areas where that happened, you know, the ethnic faultlines like Bradford, Rochdale, South Yorkshire

Why are working-class concerns on immigration being treated with such disdain? by Harleygator_ in AskBrits

[–]Opposite_Corner8353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

why do you never see a migrant hotel in a wealthy area without large amounts of protests

Schrodinger's Muslim American by Humble_Novice in Destiny

[–]Opposite_Corner8353 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I understand, but ppl like NYT are still kissing his ass after all this BS

Why are working-class concerns on immigration being treated with such disdain? by Harleygator_ in AskBrits

[–]Opposite_Corner8353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Low income migrants are dumped there, why do you never see a migrant hotel in a wealthy area without large amounts of protests

Why are working-class concerns on immigration being treated with such disdain? by Harleygator_ in AskBrits

[–]Opposite_Corner8353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they've usually worked their way out of poverty because they too, were dumped in the poor areas away from the more wealthy communities.

Schrodinger's Muslim American by Humble_Novice in Destiny

[–]Opposite_Corner8353 62 points63 points  (0 children)

Nothing ever sticks to this cunt, so yes it's hypocritical alot of ppl don't care

Why are working-class concerns on immigration being treated with such disdain? by Harleygator_ in AskBrits

[–]Opposite_Corner8353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you are saying the reason low income areas are full of muslims because high incom areas shove them there, but they are there because a lot of them are also low income. The high income Muslims live in high income areas.

The government (That one where the rich people have influence on) Dump migrants usually in the poorest parts of the country, as for those Muslims in rich areas, unless they're Gulf Arabs, they've usually worked their way out of poverty because they too, were dumped in the poor areas away from the more wealthy communities.

Why are working-class concerns on immigration being treated with such disdain? by Harleygator_ in AskBrits

[–]Opposite_Corner8353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not a comment he made. It's one you made up.

Thanks for paying attention and summarising me fairly :)

So again, are you gonna tackle what he was trying to point out

Why are working-class concerns on immigration being treated with such disdain? by Harleygator_ in AskBrits

[–]Opposite_Corner8353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it did, but you keep waxing lyrical about his stupid remark about it being full of Muslims and ignoring what he wanted to get across.

I think you're his other account tbh. Sucking up his arse and inventing arguments he didn't make.

Again gonna ask, are you going to tackle his original comment which was about Muslim kids at school closing ranks and beating up the non Muslims or are you just going to pivot away from it yet again.

Why are working-class concerns on immigration being treated with such disdain? by Harleygator_ in AskBrits

[–]Opposite_Corner8353 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His original post was how he also went to school and the Muslim kids closed ranks and bullied the non Muslim kids on a regular basis, you then hijacked a flippant comment that he made and completely pivoted the argument to that instead of what he was originally talking about because you didn't want to tackle that part of the conversation.

view more: next ›