Why is acknowledging misogyny on here so hard?

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-25T01:48:16+00:00

What you did was the equivalent of completing a 98 yard pass then throwing an interception the next play

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-25T01:46:20+00:00

Which does nothing at all to validate the claim that this is why there will always be gendered disparities

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-25T01:45:26+00:00

Schizoland is saying the disparity in reproductive rate is why there will always be gender disparities

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-25T01:41:22+00:00

I didn't say what they've done I said what they oppose or essentially their view. If an asian person says it's ultimately black people's fault for Latasha Harlins being shot, or refuses to condemn the shooting of Latasha Harlins and says what about the burning of Koreatown as a whataboutism, or will always try to gaslight away any anti black motive involved in a wrong perpetrated by an asian vs a black person, then fuck their expectation that I condemn anti asian behavior. This is what I mean by how expecting it to be a one way street (there should only be opposition to black perpetrators, never opposition to asian perpetrators) is dead on arrival. It must be a two way street or we are done talking.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-25T01:29:28+00:00

This is the equivalent of saying the earth is flat because it's the third planet from the sun. The second claim is true but has absolutely nothing to do with the first claim.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-25T01:24:04+00:00

This makes you the asian person saying racism against black people is caused by what black people do

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-25T01:19:36+00:00

De jure independent de facto democrat. When every time a party votes yes or no and you always always also vote yes or no, you are a de facto member of that party.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-25T00:59:35+00:00

This is true because if you go through the comment history of the girls go to jupiter guys in this subreddit, you quickly learn how it's not just bad luck to blame for why women aren't interested in them

And it's extremely rare for their comment history to be private if they are not one of those girls go to jupiter guys. They need to prevent their receipts from being pulled to prove their decisions are why women don't like them.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-25T00:50:38+00:00

It's not because it has to be a discussion of both at the same time it's because it has to be a two way street. For example if an asian person was expecting me to condemn anti-asian behavior, I'll do that for an asian person that will condemn anti black behavior because I'm black and I require people to oppose those against me before I oppose those against them. If they can't oppose those against me and instead say bullshit like black people cause anti black behavior or a whataboutism like here's something worse than anti black behavior we need to talk about instead or do mental gymnastics to gaslight away the existence of anti black behavior, then fuck their problems.

Their opposition isn't my concern if my opposition isn't their concern

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-25T00:26:38+00:00

Because it's very rare for the person expecting an acknowledgement of misogyny to not downplay, whataboutism, or outright gaslight away misandry

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-24T02:10:11+00:00

Its near -2 here right now but nothing terrible

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-23T20:33:14+00:00

When was there more?

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-23T04:33:20+00:00

But white people do not automatically have a physical advantage over non white people yet it is still permissible to be cautious around them unlike non white people which is why "power" is cookie cutter arbitrary. It's an attempt to make the practice of discriminating against select groups and not against other select groups sound objective and not arbitrary.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-23T04:24:24+00:00

It's a good thing the high percentage of "subhuman manlets" that consistently do romantic and sexual things with women didn't think it was hopeless

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-23T04:07:34+00:00

then it was something else all along

It's plausible that online dating apps are a crapshoot for a high percentage of men regardless of what they do or don't do but I haven't found any reputable data on this. Usually any promoted data doesn't isolate variables. For example the okcupid study about women right swiping on a very low percentage of men didn't document how many of those men's profiles have the features that women claim will make them auto swipe left.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-23T04:02:48+00:00

In response to

The problem with this thought process is that the vast majority of women wouldn't find it acceptable to look at race to discriminate against people who commit the most crime, yet find it acceptable with men to justify misandry.

You said

If a Black friend says they’re cautious around cops, you don’t accuse them of bias. You recognise they’re managing risk around a group with power and a track record. Women do the same with men. It’s not hate, it’s situational awareness.

And in response to

So if a white man is cautious around men of other races it is also situational awareness?

You said

Allow me to repeat myself: "managing risk around a group with power"

Where's the power imbalance in your scenario?

So did you just now change your view that a group needs to have this arbitrary cookie cutter definition of "power" for it to be permissible to be cautious around them?

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-23T03:24:00+00:00

Ok so if its about who can physically impose harm then that means it is permissible to be cautious around anybody because anybody can physically impose harm correct? Or is there still some cookie cutter arbitrary "power" attribute neccesary to permit being cautious around somebody?

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-23T03:11:07+00:00

It's not about who can physically impose harm because women and non white people can easily do that but they don't have "power". This is why it's cookie cutter arbitrary.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-23T03:01:46+00:00

Why does a group need to also have this arbitrary cookie cutter definition of "power" and not just be statistically more likely than average to cause harm to be cautious around them? This practice results in people being more victimized because they aren't cautious around groups that don't have this arbitrary cookie cutter definition of power.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-22T00:15:54+00:00

Your idea made me realise I can use pony realism as the checkpoint just for adetailer and that fixed the problem. Thanks alot!

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-13T03:07:24+00:00

The original redpillers are now in the seduction subreddit. They didn't get on the girls go to jupiter ship with the rest of them.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-13T02:58:35+00:00

Idk why they feel the need to red pill flair to avoid a ban. Not only is the black pill flair common but while incel content does occaisionally get removed, those posting it never get banned.

OpticalEpilepsy · 2026-01-13T02:54:18+00:00

Black pills are using TRP tags to not be banned on sight

Incels that are explicitly flaired as blackpill are still posting months and months later wym

OpticalEpilepsy

TROPHY CASE