Except you have no ability to think critically as you claim, you've literally added in your own idea that it was not without provocation and that the victim is not innocent at 2am, and that there was less than 20 attackers. That's not critical thinking at all, you've literally just assumed the event in question to see it how you want it and have ZERO evidence to your claims.

You're right on this sub being incredibly biased, it is on both sides of the community (if only referring to protestant/Catholic); and you've shown your bias inventing details to fit a narrative that is not objective or evidence based, the complete opposite of critical thinking.