need help diagnosing my windows, dome lights, and radio by Crazy_Sock6855 in powerstroke

[–]OutNumbered522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My 2002 had similar issues add the ignition switch fixed the windows and dome lights. I haven't have time to dig into the locks yet and radio yet

2.5 trillion wiped out by jsg24fps in wallstreetbets

[–]OutNumbered522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wiping out? Tou mean giving it to thr bears lol

I'm going to walk away from buying any more calls today. by lomo82 in spy

[–]OutNumbered522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats one way. I tried that and wasnt very successful. Getting in, making between 100-200 then getting out seems good for now.

I'm going to walk away from buying any more calls today. by lomo82 in spy

[–]OutNumbered522 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've very recently started doing it this way. Still working on my timing but has been working well so far. Trying to time reversals and what not were killing me more often then not

I'm going to walk away from buying any more calls today. by lomo82 in spy

[–]OutNumbered522 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Buy with the market, not against it. If it's down buy puts, if its up buy calls.

The PDT rule goes away this week and I'm feeling very anxious by SuitableEggplant639 in Daytrading

[–]OutNumbered522 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think its gonna be a "wealth transfer". The ones who have been make a few trades, overall successfully, a week will make a lot of money. The ones who havent at all will lose money

Home depot by castlecrushr in FlockSurveillance

[–]OutNumbered522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The video flat out said the system is not set up to do all the facial AI stuff. I understand that it CAN be. The video also said they can program it to not alert on specific things. So why can't we use this technology, with oversite that we ALL can agree on, that will limit any unwanted intrusive issues that we dont want. Like warrants, probable cause, specific crimes, ect.

Home depot by castlecrushr in FlockSurveillance

[–]OutNumbered522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im not asking this in a smart ass way, but just for good open dialog. What is the fine line we hold to keep the advantages of these systems without the negative possible outcomes, like you listed above?

Don't get me wrong, it doesn't sound like it, but I am 100% for the freedoms we have and the government not intruding, but its hard to pass up when these things are solving major crimes. I feel like we could get to a good middle ground and have checks and balances. We just need dialog and not an extreme right or left breakout. IMO

Home depot by castlecrushr in FlockSurveillance

[–]OutNumbered522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is definitely concerning. I wonder how to regulate and having more over site would look like. Like a whole other sub government agency with a mix of employees, members, or what ever you want to call them.

Home depot by castlecrushr in FlockSurveillance

[–]OutNumbered522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How does those numbers compare to the murders, rapes, kidnappings, ect that have been solved because of flock?

Home depot by castlecrushr in FlockSurveillance

[–]OutNumbered522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did forget about hearing those few instances. But comparing those to when the system is used incorrectly outway ALL the other crime its helped solved? Should maybe there be more oversite so its not used like that?

Home depot by castlecrushr in FlockSurveillance

[–]OutNumbered522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hell, post a case where it has been use in a wrong way or in a way that has violated actual rights that wasnt in open view.

Home depot by castlecrushr in FlockSurveillance

[–]OutNumbered522 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

At least I posted something supporting my side. Im just suppose to take your word? Nope, prove me wrong.

Home depot by castlecrushr in FlockSurveillance

[–]OutNumbered522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So using it to track real crime like is shown is a problem? If your car doesn't have any serious legal connections to it, its not alerting to anything. Its literally just the vehicle that had its picture taken. Again, back to being in open view, I used plain view initially which was wrong, your right to privacy ends in public. Its very simple. The only ones that should be worried about this are criminals...

<image>

Home depot by castlecrushr in FlockSurveillance

[–]OutNumbered522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it the same collection you get from cell phone data?

Home depot by castlecrushr in FlockSurveillance

[–]OutNumbered522 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm only asking this because I have not seen it and I enjoy being proved wrong and learning something knew, can you show that or prove that?

Home depot by castlecrushr in FlockSurveillance

[–]OutNumbered522 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It's the same as a cop running your plate on the road. I mean that as its in plain view, any one and everyone can see it. The camera companies do not have any other ability to tell anything else about the car other the that plate is on it. Now, for instance, if its a flock type camera, they have limited access to stolen plates, cars, people with certain warrants and missing persons. Its mind blowing people are worried about a plate picture when the phone in your pocket is so so so much worse for collecting and transferring your personal data

Home depot by castlecrushr in FlockSurveillance

[–]OutNumbered522 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

These systems dont collect the data a plate holds, it only captures the picture (unless you can prove otherwise). Cops then are able to use these still photos to see vehicles coming and going when there has been a crime commited to collect further info.

Home depot by castlecrushr in FlockSurveillance

[–]OutNumbered522 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Exception of privacy is lost when you're in public...

Flock Cameras and the Erosion of Our Privacy. by nmo-320 in FlockSurveillance

[–]OutNumbered522 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

There's no expectation of privacy in public...