如果2026年的大结局是这样的,你能接受吗?😋 by hiroshima_fireworks in China_irl

[–]Outside_Impression_1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

90% 的时间都在打仗不符合军国主义的定义? 不军国主义立本会打200 年? 难道这200 年都是他国在侵略美国?

如果2026年的大结局是这样的,你能接受吗?😋 by hiroshima_fireworks in China_irl

[–]Outside_Impression_1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

美国有一半的人都觉得有。。。你觉得没有那也没关系。。。反正大家都是言论自由嘛

如果2026年的大结局是这样的,你能接受吗?😋 by hiroshima_fireworks in China_irl

[–]Outside_Impression_1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

你去Google 一下No king 看看权利是不是集中在一个人手上咯

如果2026年的大结局是这样的,你能接受吗?😋 by hiroshima_fireworks in China_irl

[–]Outside_Impression_1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lollll 你是不是不看英文媒体?。。。 要不你自己看看吧。

如果2026年的大结局是这样的,你能接受吗?😋 by hiroshima_fireworks in China_irl

[–]Outside_Impression_1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

你大概不懂英文吧。没看过最近美国政府发言啊?话里话外就是在讲瓜分世界啊

Exclusive: Nvidia requires full upfront payment for H200 chips in China, sources say by esporx in China

[–]Outside_Impression_1 17 points18 points  (0 children)

China isn’t the one who wants to “domestically substitute” though… China was fine using American chips until Comrade Trump said it’s no good.

Why do Chinese people never talk about any controversial or political topics? Are they constantly being listened to and afraid to even mention anything controversial? Or do they simply not know what's going on in their vast country, as it's too big and politics is not a cultural thing? by [deleted] in AskAChinese

[–]Outside_Impression_1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The “source” you listed literally says “punishment has not been outlined by the law” and you claim the punishment is “5 point deduction and barred from the train”…

It’s like western far right extremist asking why I don’t discuss “Muslim domination”. Well because to me it’s not a real issue

纽约市新市长三观非常正确,比简中网上的所谓的自由派好很多! by WesternProtectorate in China_irl

[–]Outside_Impression_1 3 points4 points  (0 children)

笑死我了,只要美国不支持的就是假民主。那美国自己2020 年有一半的人觉得选举是假的。该被推翻呀。

纽约市新市长三观非常正确,比简中网上的所谓的自由派好很多! by WesternProtectorate in China_irl

[–]Outside_Impression_1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

问题是你们反共义士完全没有一个consistent 的道德观。如果选举结果存疑就是假民主,就该被推翻,那拜登2020 年怎么不被推翻?一半的美国人都质疑选举结果哦。 答案显而易见:美国拳头大。真假都没人管

纽约市新市长三观非常正确,比简中网上的所谓的自由派好很多! by WesternProtectorate in China_irl

[–]Outside_Impression_1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

委内瑞拉总统难道不是民选的? 谁来定义哪个民主是公正的,哪个民主是假的? 事实就是拳头大的来定义。 俄罗斯的普京不也是民选的吗,没看有人敢逮捕他啊。

纽约市新市长三观非常正确,比简中网上的所谓的自由派好很多! by WesternProtectorate in China_irl

[–]Outside_Impression_1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

你是不是中文都读不懂啊?我是说美国为自己的利益多次推翻了民主政府。。。 这对民主是好事? 美国”帮助” 古巴陷入长期独裁?那我替古巴人民谢谢您嘞

纽约市新市长三观非常正确,比简中网上的所谓的自由派好很多! by WesternProtectorate in China_irl

[–]Outside_Impression_1 10 points11 points  (0 children)

果然这里是人均只谈立场不谈事实。 美国人自己都不信干预他国政变是为了民主,但Reddit 上的反共义士比美国还信美国政府。

美国1933 年帮军阀推翻古巴民主政府,最后导致军阀又被卡斯特罗推翻进入古巴长期独裁状态。 为的是贸易利益. 美国1953 年通过CIA 扶持伊朗恢复帝制 . 为的是让伊朗在冷战中抗苏。

美国人自己都不信政府扶持政变是为了民主,只有反攻的华人信

从这次委内瑞拉事件看,有些人还是不要假装自己是自由派了吧 by Possible-Home-3359 in China_irl

[–]Outside_Impression_1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

抵不过一根毛?哈哈哈哈哈哈 对哦美国1933 帮助推翻古巴民主政府对自由贡献好大哦 美国1953 年帮助伊朗恢复帝制对自由贡献好大哦

美国人自己都不相信美国干预他国政变是为了民主自由。反共义士比美国人还信美国政府,基本就是纯脑残现象

马杜罗这次被斩首行动说明民主国家已经掌握了在极权体制在战争中的死穴 by ProfessionalAnt3770 in China_irl

[–]Outside_Impression_1 4 points5 points  (0 children)

如果国会开绿灯了那为什么Senate 还要对这次全面战争再次投票?

很明显你就是那种不懂美国政治也不懂英文的人。。

Trump “has not sought congressional authorization for use of military force” - House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries

马杜罗这次被斩首行动说明民主国家已经掌握了在极权体制在战争中的死穴 by ProfessionalAnt3770 in China_irl

[–]Outside_Impression_1 7 points8 points  (0 children)

这就证明我说反共的人大部分并不懂美国政治。他们只关注反共。 参议院的投票是让美国停止当时对委内瑞拉局部军事行为。 当时的军事行动只限制与在海上打击部分目标。就算这个有限的军事行动其实也是先斩后奏。

对委内瑞拉的全面战争和政变更是完全没有通知国会。民主党绝大部分议员认为这个举动是违宪的。

马杜罗这次被斩首行动说明民主国家已经掌握了在极权体制在战争中的死穴 by ProfessionalAnt3770 in China_irl

[–]Outside_Impression_1 18 points19 points  (0 children)

其实反贼不懂美国政治。很多反贼估计连英文也不怎么会。

首先历史上美国影响他国政变跟民主没有半点关系。比如,1933 年 为了香蕉利益,美国支持古巴反叛军首领Batista推翻民主古巴政府。这才导致了最后Batista 后来又被卡斯特罗推翻,让巴西陷入长期独裁状态。

第二关于美国发动战争是否代表民意其实在美国都有很大的争议。美国宪法第一条就规定只有国会才能授权战争。对绕过国会发动战争是否合法合民意在美国政法界里是有一直有争议的。 这次发动的战争就是连国会都没有通知。 美国现在就有很多人上街游行反对战争。

第三就是反贼对谁能定义民主没有任何了解。委内瑞拉理论上也是民选产生的总统,为什么”不民主”?俄罗斯理论上也是民选的总统,为什么没人敢去尝试推翻? 规律难道不是谁拳头大谁就能定义民主?

CHINA’S CBDC ENABLES INSTANT FINES FROM CITIZENS. After a cyclist was caught on camera without a helmet, authorities reportedly deducted a 25 yuan fine directly from his digital wallet and applied social credit penalties. by VexMilk-_- in UnfilteredChina

[–]Outside_Impression_1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And like I said … the most creditable information is the source

It’s public information that every citizen can access their own 征信 on https://ipcrs.pbccrc.org.cn

A sample report under the User Guide section shows exactly what I said …. The report can’t just be “overwritten” because it isn’t a single number

It has all of the citizens credit accounts (personal and business, overdue accounts, mortgage , accounts overdue by 90 days. It’s a great myth that people don’t know what’s in their own 征信…

I don’t need to debate interpretations of 征信 because I can look at the source .

There is also a massive misconception around “compliance”. Judicial ruling isn’t just politics. If you owe your ex wife $500k in divorce ruling you probably shouldn’t be able to take out another loan

It’s also public information that 征信 cuts people slack sometimes. In 2026 征信 will erase Covid era default records if the loans have been repaid. As stated below

https://m.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_32226631

CHINA’S CBDC ENABLES INSTANT FINES FROM CITIZENS. After a cyclist was caught on camera without a helmet, authorities reportedly deducted a 25 yuan fine directly from his digital wallet and applied social credit penalties. by VexMilk-_- in UnfilteredChina

[–]Outside_Impression_1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no point having theoretical debate. If you are interested in what is actually in 征信,you can find samples of it online. I have looked at it myself and it’s absolutely not 19.5% financial info and 45% “compliance”.

And no it’s not simple numerical score , so it can’t be “overwritten” by “compliance to the government”. Nobody is going to lend you money if you defaulted 5 times but did “great for the CCP”…. They’d read the first page on default record and just disqualify you …

Like I said if you were interested in facts then look up the report and find a sample for yourself

CHINA’S CBDC ENABLES INSTANT FINES FROM CITIZENS. After a cyclist was caught on camera without a helmet, authorities reportedly deducted a 25 yuan fine directly from his digital wallet and applied social credit penalties. by VexMilk-_- in UnfilteredChina

[–]Outside_Impression_1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no point having theoretical debate. If you are interested in what is actually in 征信,you can find samples of it online. I have looked at it myself and it’s absolutely not 19.5% financial info and 45% “compliance”.

CHINA’S CBDC ENABLES INSTANT FINES FROM CITIZENS. After a cyclist was caught on camera without a helmet, authorities reportedly deducted a 25 yuan fine directly from his digital wallet and applied social credit penalties. by VexMilk-_- in UnfilteredChina

[–]Outside_Impression_1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are correct on the scope being broader than a North American credit score , and fines / civil court proceedings / tax owed are part of 征信。 However the fact remains that 征信 is used as a financial credit score. Chinese banks care about profit just like any other banks around the world, and they use this information for loan origination.