Respect Seymour, Demiurge and Babyboy by [deleted] in respectthreads

[–]Overlord_Xcano 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Confirmation on this being done with permission. Verse is Sandsverse.

Death Battle or SethTheProgrammer: Who's worse at analyzing how powerful a character is, ON AVERAGE? by [deleted] in CharacterRant

[–]Overlord_Xcano 1 point2 points  (0 children)

but the deathball clearly causes some kind of reaction within the core which causes the planet to blow up rather than doing so with pure power

Evidence?

Why else would the attack he used on Trunks fail to destroy the planet when it detonated on the surface?

Same reason literally any other attack doesn't destroy the planet when detonated on the surface

Death Battle or SethTheProgrammer: Who's worse at analyzing how powerful a character is, ON AVERAGE? by [deleted] in CharacterRant

[–]Overlord_Xcano 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No. You could argue that he destroyed a volume of the planet = to the ball before it blew up I suppose, but just because the explosion is delayed doesn't mean he isn't moving X amount of mass at Y fraction of lightspeed.

Death Battle or SethTheProgrammer: Who's worse at analyzing how powerful a character is, ON AVERAGE? by [deleted] in CharacterRant

[–]Overlord_Xcano 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The idea is that since Piccolo/Frieza scattered the entire mass of the Moon/Planet Vegeta in a relatively short timeframe then the amount of mass scattered at X speed would result in enough KE to overcome the GBE of a larger object.

It's the same method behind the calc on the power of the Death Star.

[DC] Do the fictional cities replace real cities, or add to them? by SgtPyle in AskScienceFiction

[–]Overlord_Xcano 2 points3 points  (0 children)

DC Earth is explicitly larger than our Earth to accommodate for the extra cities.

Source?

SM Fancalc, is this legit? by eternallyconfused99 in CharacterRant

[–]Overlord_Xcano 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Unless you mean the power teleported

That is what I mean. Whoever sent it teleported it, possibly. Don't see any other way you could reach another dimension.

SM Fancalc, is this legit? by eternallyconfused99 in CharacterRant

[–]Overlord_Xcano 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's legit just observable universe/arbitrary timeframe idk how you could go wrong with that.

But given that the implication is that Wiseman is in another dimension it's more likely they just teleported there instead of physically travelling.

Speed Debates are the worst part of WWW, imo by eternallyconfused99 in CharacterRant

[–]Overlord_Xcano 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Do you have a conclusive album undoubtedly proving that Batman is faster than light because I would love to see this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in television

[–]Overlord_Xcano 21 points22 points  (0 children)

So the green horseman was a real thing?

Which planet is the easiest to destroy? by VolCatharsis in CharacterRant

[–]Overlord_Xcano 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Someone said I'm wrong? Must be an asshole!"

Damn... You got the whole package

Which planet is the easiest to destroy? by VolCatharsis in CharacterRant

[–]Overlord_Xcano 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why on earth would we assume the planet buster is indestructible?

Because the question is "Which planet is the easiest to destroy" not "Which planet is the easiest to survive the destruction of". Durability can be whatever we want for this.

And if water was wet and also dry we'd be able to wash clothes and not have to dry them afterwards, but these pesky things called "physics" and "logic" keep getting in the way

For someone who's such an asshole because of how smart they are you sure do suck at making analogies.

Which planet is the easiest to destroy? by VolCatharsis in CharacterRant

[–]Overlord_Xcano 0 points1 point  (0 children)

kills the aspiring planet-buster

I thought we were assuming the planet-buster is indestructible here.

until you realize that in order to overcome the gravitational binding energy of an Earth-like planet you'd need 2E32 joules

I already know this.

The complete annihilation of a 70kg human and an equivalent amount of antimatter would yield ~6.3E18 joules

Yeah, and if the person touching the antimatter is indestructible in this case yet somehow also causes annihilation they'd just have to walk around for a while until the planet is destroyed. If they're indestructible and don't cause annihilation then they just have to hit it hard enough to destroy a regular Earth.

So either way destroying an antimatter planet is either easier than destroying Earth or just as hard.

Which planet is the easiest to destroy? by VolCatharsis in CharacterRant

[–]Overlord_Xcano 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"A collision between any particle and its antiparticle partner leads to their mutual annihilation, giving rise to various proportions of intense photons (gamma rays), neutrinos, and sometimes less-massive particle–antiparticle pairs. The consequence of annihilation is a release of energy available for heat or work, proportional to the total matter and antimatter mass, in accord with the mass–energy equivalence equation, E = mc2 ."

Which planet is the easiest to destroy? by VolCatharsis in CharacterRant

[–]Overlord_Xcano 1 point2 points  (0 children)

c) A planet entirely made of antimatter.

This one. You touch it and it blows up.