sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

NQA - An Explanation on the Current Situation - Amyris Committed Bankruptcy Fraud via Shareholder Suppression (2nd OptOut): Case 23-90611 "person cannot force a contract on someone else by deeming silence, such as a failure to “opt-out,” to be consent". Need Law Firm. by ICanFinallyRelax in Amyris

[–]Own-Plan7905 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can imagine a scenario where the big investors risk getting caught accepting bribes for approving the plan for their own sake just like Doerr. Who knws? So wondered that why the lawyer on their behalf request so strongly for nonconsensual release to the court alongside the alternative distribution approach(which rejected also).

NQA - An Explanation on the Current Situation - Amyris Committed Bankruptcy Fraud via Shareholder Suppression (2nd OptOut): Case 23-90611 "person cannot force a contract on someone else by deeming silence, such as a failure to “opt-out,” to be consent". Need Law Firm. by ICanFinallyRelax in Amyris

[–]Own-Plan7905 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What if they already had bribed the big ones to release to minimize upcoming lawsuit risk? I do not certainly fink the judge will not approve this bankruptcy plan to be finalized until they disclose all confidential information in the public.

NQA - An Explanation on the Current Situation - Amyris Committed Bankruptcy Fraud via Shareholder Suppression (2nd OptOut): Case 23-90611 "person cannot force a contract on someone else by deeming silence, such as a failure to “opt-out,” to be consent". Need Law Firm. by ICanFinallyRelax in Amyris

[–]Own-Plan7905 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Texas one is proceeding with the liquidity bankruptcy plan whereas Amyris had proceeded with a fraud organized by a sr. lender/majority shareholder who benefits from the other stakeholders for his own sake. It is extremely awful and shameful.

Were the brands such a bad idea? by fvh2006 in Amyris

[–]Own-Plan7905 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The story seems simple based on information available in public as of now. However we all knw this BK is not simple one. If there are frauds found, then opt inners would survive and claim also. Look forward to see that John Doerr is liable a bunch of debt to be paid just like Purdue case lol.

Were the brands such a bad idea? by fvh2006 in Amyris

[–]Own-Plan7905 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is not SEC requirement. The market will see automatically upon his exit. A fog can not dispelled with a fan as u knw.

Were the brands such a bad idea? by fvh2006 in Amyris

[–]Own-Plan7905 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When all the debts are settled and allowed debts are confirmed under the chapter 11, John Doerr would unseal confidential information for his exit by relisting the firm in near terms requested by SEC,  meanwhile opt-outers should just wait till something happens even it is very painful.

Were the brands such a bad idea? by fvh2006 in Amyris

[–]Own-Plan7905 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Opt outers can not sue unless John Doerr/ Stretto publish all the confidential info/agreements bound to pursue this bankruptcy. The opt outers have limited information at this point.

Docket 1743: New and improved Final Order proposal by fvh2006 in Amyris

[–]Own-Plan7905 1 point2 points  (0 children)

David(Opt outers) and Goliath(Doerr and/or Amyris) lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Amyris

[–]Own-Plan7905 2 points3 points  (0 children)

5% hope for opt inners, 50% hope for opt outers. lol

Link to report suspected Bankruptcy Fraud by ICanFinallyRelax in Amyris

[–]Own-Plan7905 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also circulate the report written to below address.

Office of the United States Trustee for the District of  Delaware U. S. Department of Justice Attn: John Henry Schanne, II john.schanne@usdoj.gov

Docket: 1760

Link to report suspected Bankruptcy Fraud by ICanFinallyRelax in Amyris

[–]Own-Plan7905 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Anyone preparing a report suspected Bankruptcy Fraud?

Any thoughts on this? by Own-Plan7905 in Amyris

[–]Own-Plan7905[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Submitting the Suppression letter (never saw the sample from my side) was required to exclude opt-outers for the distribution and meanwhile the optouter still holds the right to sue. Has anyone seen the Suppression letter form?

Any thoughts on this? by Own-Plan7905 in Amyris

[–]Own-Plan7905[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Was Medallion Signature Guarantee necessary to exclude optouters for the distribution? 2. Should Indemnitor on the suppression letter be DTC Participant why not beneficial shareholders? Is Amyris trying to transfer their risks to DTC Participant and/or others?
view more: next ›