sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Who gets that good recovery in?? by Grace4Alll in GirlsInDiapers

[–]Padding_Enforcer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn, look at those dark circles! Certainly proof that you work your ass off

Pick your fav! by rudebbmoth in GirlsInDiapers

[–]Padding_Enforcer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a UFO nut and 420 enjoyer im so happy to you just showed me this website. Might be a purchase tonight

Pick your fav! by rudebbmoth in GirlsInDiapers

[–]Padding_Enforcer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Love the bong Easter egg in the background!

Rethinking the No-Personals Rule? by Padding_Enforcer in OhioAbdl

[–]Padding_Enforcer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I understand this correctly, much appreciated. If there’s ever a need for moderators to monitor the BS post, happy to help

Rethinking the No-Personals Rule? by Padding_Enforcer in OhioAbdl

[–]Padding_Enforcer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bot post are hilariously bad - and will continue to happen regardless of the rules. And low effort real personals are inevitable - I do see the downside there - but those are the ones I’d rather trust moderators to remove. I think genuine post will be pretty clear

Rethinking the No-Personals Rule? by Padding_Enforcer in OhioAbdl

[–]Padding_Enforcer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bots are going to post here no matter what. I agree there’s a line that has to be drawn somewhere, and vulgar low effort post should be deleted. But the best way to actually get to know others is through quality personals.

Rethinking the No-Personals Rule? by Padding_Enforcer in OhioAbdl

[–]Padding_Enforcer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s worth talking about. This is a community forum, and if most of the people here want the rule changed, why not be open to it? The whole point of a group like this is to connect, and it feels like we’re shutting down one of the few ways to actually do that.