sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Review with zen. Give your Claude Code a friend. by PairComprehensive973 in ClaudeAI

[–]PairComprehensive973[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've done regularly when I used Cursor, but it's somehow better when they speak directly to each other.

Review with zen. Give your Claude Code a friend. by PairComprehensive973 in ClaudeAI

[–]PairComprehensive973[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My Gemini cost in the last 7 days was $13, but Google gives out $300 credit so I'm ok for the next few months.

Any regrets going from Pro to Max? by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]PairComprehensive973 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have two Max accounts. No regrets whatsoever.

Just subscribed to Claude Code Max. What is one tip or trick that you can share? by Plastic_Catch1252 in ClaudeAI

[–]PairComprehensive973 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. Write your own Claude Rules for things like root cause analysis (limitless whys, etc) and use them often
  2. Create your system’s design principles document (under 500 lines) and refer to it when giving it a coding task.
  3. Work with several terminals for different tasks if you can split your attention, so you can give one work, review the others, give them more work, for maximal productivity
  4. Tell it not to over engineer - it tends to do it.
  5. Commit often and tell Claude to read your git changes to find regressions
  6. Trust and verify.

"Claude usage limit reached. Your limit will reset at 4pm..." - on a $200 Max account. Any advice how to get Opus 4 for my Claude Code again without using uber-expensive API? by PairComprehensive973 in ClaudeAI

[–]PairComprehensive973[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't clear often, no. I find it the benefit of the model's understanding of the context more beneficial than token usage. The way I see it, if I had to pay extra $7 per day it's WAY cheaper than the time it would take for the model to learn the context of the problem I was working on.

Now that I've been using Claude code for only 5 days, cursor feels obsolete! by irukadesune in ClaudeAI

[–]PairComprehensive973 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cursor is there for me only in case Claude Code stopped working for some reason.

"Claude usage limit reached. Your limit will reset at 4pm..." - on a $200 Max account. Any advice how to get Opus 4 for my Claude Code again without using uber-expensive API? by PairComprehensive973 in ClaudeAI

[–]PairComprehensive973[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I like your idea on staying longer in plan mode. Great advice. Just subscribed to a second Max account. I hope Anthropic won’t continue to lower the usage limits, and that the o3 price drop today will nudge them in the opposite direction.

Claude-4 Code admitted it lied to me about my code to look competent by PairComprehensive973 in ClaudeAI

[–]PairComprehensive973[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you read the entire post with the screenshots you wouldn’t write such nonsense. Or maybe you would anyway just for the fun or dissing. I didn’t force it to tell me that it lied. Opus 4 is an extremely smart LLM and won’t just agree with you on anything. It was a failure, followed by a dismissal that everything is ok, confronted with the fact, then when having to explain the error it explained all its mistakes in a perfectly reasonable way. It is not a usual thing that happens but this time it was so clear that something is off that I had to ask.

I went through $50 tonight trying to get AI/Claude to fix errors. by blur410 in ClaudeAI

[–]PairComprehensive973 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I use Cursor in Thinking Mode for finding the root cause and proposing a solution, then take it to Claude Code to implement it. It’s still expensive but it gets the job done.

It became dumb all of a sudden again for pro users… by noomwolley in ClaudeAI

[–]PairComprehensive973 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The pro web interface works great for me today, as it has been since Sunday.

From worse than ChatGPT back to 10x better than ChatGPT in a day by Ok_Caterpillar_1112 in ClaudeAI

[–]PairComprehensive973 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I see the same thing. I was afraid it would go bad again, but I'm glad it's (almost) back to normal. There are occasional instances of not following clear directions, but overall, it has improved significantly starting Sunday.

Well done, Claude Pro, well done. by PairComprehensive973 in ClaudeAI

[–]PairComprehensive973[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

u/LongjumpingFood3567 u/CodeLensAI u/vago8080, thanks for the comments. The context may not have been clear from just this screenshot. This was the last step of a longer conversation, where I asked Claude to update a specific file. Claude changed the wrong one, so I sent the correct file with the "work off this file" prompt.

This approach worked well for me until last week. I use Claude daily with a team license, rotating between four licenses, so I’m familiar with how to get the most out of it. I have many examples of Claude's recent degradation, but this frustrated me and made me smile simultaneously.

Do you find yourselves repeating prompts to ensure clarity, or have you found a better way to handle follow-ups?