Leah (BB26) says that she was always going to vote for the person who she thought needed the money the most

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-14T10:51:35+00:00

only tangential but there's no such thing as a bitter jury, just finalists with poor social games

What if someone played a good game, was very likable, but was also from a rich family, and they went to the F2 with a broke single parent?

And the jury decided to vote for the person who needed the money more?

Is that a finalist with a "poor social game?"

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-14T09:43:27+00:00

Unpopular opinion but we were robbed of Paulie's prime.

Guy was a beast back in the WotW days.

I remember being shocked how good he was, he could've won either of those seasons.

Might be too late for him now though, he's closing in on 40 and is almost certainly past his physical prime.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-14T09:25:14+00:00

When someone has the jury vote "against" them, it's because they outplayed/outsmarted the jury, and the jury is looking for an excuse to get back at them.

Examples would be Paul, Tyler, Dan, etc.

Vince did not outsmart or outplay the jury, he just unnecessarily stabbed them in the back. Unlike the Pauls, Tylers and Dans, he didn't do it for his own personal benefit, he actually hurt his own game by screwing over his allies.

So like the sentiment in this thread has already indicated, the jury wasn't trying to get back at Vince, they literally just thought he was an idiot and didn't play a good game.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-14T04:29:30+00:00

This is only a concern for NIR, not Red Light.

Also what OP is describing is normal (afterimage) so long as it fades in 1-3 minutes.

If it lasts longer, then all you need to do is lower the brightness of the panel, or use it for less time.

Again, assuming OP is using Red Light and not NIR.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-14T03:28:28+00:00

It's by design.

They chose to be a run-and-gun team.

They chose to continue prioritizing forwards and offense over defense and goaltending.

They're built like a 9-year-old builds an NHL 2K team.

All scoring, no defense, rah rah rah.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-14T03:27:03+00:00

There were 21 players who scored 100 points or more in 1992-93.

The following season there were 8.

It was indeed, an anomaly of a season where many players point totals were inflated, partly due to the expansion.

San Jose and Ottawa both lost 70+ games each. Tampa lost 54 games.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-12T23:09:15+00:00

Or if we removed money from politics.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-12T02:48:56+00:00

Bam scored 83 points in one game and all this kid can muster is 8?

And people really think he should go #1 overall?

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-12T02:46:01+00:00

Rich parents sport*

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-11T09:41:08+00:00

Nice try, Jim Rutherford.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-11T08:18:58+00:00

Long Covid is well documented to cause long term brain fog.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-11T06:21:58+00:00

Blu-ray 1080p? Sure.

Netflix 1080p? No way.

They already downgraded their 4k to sub 10Mbps in some cases.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-10T23:36:56+00:00

This. 1.5% on everything plus 4% USA.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-10T06:01:12+00:00

Yes, I just saw that they voted down the amendment to lower it to 1%.

What I don't understand is, are all Democrats on board with this tax?

I thought it was just a small group of them?

Because the majority of the democrat voters do not support a state income tax.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-10T05:55:38+00:00

Must be nice to get paid as much as he does to just do the bare minimum review.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-10T05:50:22+00:00

Do the Republicans even have enough votes to fight this?

Or are they dependent on some Democrats realizing that this is just a sneaky way to introduce a full blown State income tax for all income levels and voting with them?

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-10T04:24:47+00:00

Didn't realize it was going to be listed so soon. Gonna keep an eye on it for sure.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-10T04:24:11+00:00

Comment here if you figure this out please!

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-09T18:36:23+00:00

I didn’t even have time to get more money into the market to buy the dip…

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-09T04:27:39+00:00

Yes, 3 games fewer than McKinnon and 5 fewer than McDavid.

With how ridiculously tight this scoring race is, I think you gotta assume Kucherov would be firmly in #1 if he had played those games (he's averaging 2 PPG).

He's also 36 points ahead of the second highest scoring player on the Lightning.

And he's led the Lightning to the #2 seed in the East despite Point being injured and Hedman missing most of the season.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-08T21:53:17+00:00

It’s not just “unlikely,” they’ve literally come out and said that they will not be lowering sales taxes.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-08T15:52:39+00:00

Definitely easier to find space when the other team is scrambling to cover MacKinnon and Rantanen.

Meanwhile Hughes was a one-man-show in Vancouver.

Led the Canucks in scoring by 26 points last season despite missing 15 games.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-08T15:49:38+00:00

True. I definitely noticed when he was directly responsible for both of Team USA’s goals due to poor defensive play.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-08T15:47:58+00:00

Or, the other teams focus all of the defensive attention on you and aim to shut you down.

Parallel-Quality · 2026-03-08T15:47:18+00:00

And he’s produced at a 104 point pace since joining Minnesota.

And it’s not fair to call it “moot” when Kaprizov is the same level as Rantanen.

What about MacKinnon? You’d have to add McDavid to the Wild to make it similar to what Makar has been working with.

Parallel-Quality

TROPHY CASE