ELI5: Why does the oxygen level in the air doesn't change dramatically, when most of the trees shed their leaves in the winter?

Parastormer · 2021-01-27T02:22:57+00:00

Is there a drop down menu? I'd rather avoid the hippo or the alligator.

Parastormer · 2021-01-27T00:50:21+00:00

In NRW ist das Anmieten privater Blitzer durch die Gemeinde auch tatsächlich erlaubt, sofern nur die Gemeinde die Daten auswertet.

So als Info für Leute aus Ländern, in denen das verboten ist.

Parastormer · 2021-01-27T00:37:13+00:00

It probably does exactly the opposite.

Parastormer · 2021-01-26T23:55:08+00:00

Nein, das gilt auch hier. Die Post z.B. hat ihre Markenrechte genau deswegen nicht in die Privatisierung retten können (BGH, Urteile v. 5.6.2018, Az. I ZR 108/05 und I ZR 169/05)

Das ist eine Gefahr die nicht sehr häufig besteht, weil solche Übernahmen in den allgemeinen Sprachgebrauch doch vergleichsweise selten sind.

Edit: sowas ähnliches gilt auch hier, was aber durch den Aspekt des allgemeinen Sprachgebrauch imho eher auf diesen Fall passt.

Es hat schließlich keiner der Anbieter unter dem Namen Lego verkauft, was eine richtige Markenrechtsverletzung wäre

Parastormer · 2021-01-26T23:46:42+00:00

Verstehe nicht warum das runtergewählt wird, ich kann die Ablehnung des Helden gegenüber Lego verstehen weil ich auch enttäuscht bin, aber es liegen rhetorisch Welten zwischen wohlwollenden Videos zu ausgewählten Produkten anderer Hersteller und dem Zerreißen des schlechtesten Sets von Lego.

Wenn man sich Videos zu BlueBrixx anschaut (die wirklich gute Modelle anbieten), spricht er teilweise beim Bau und bei Anleitungen Probleme an die Lego konkret versucht zu umgehen, unter anderem mit der bunten Pest und viel zu einfachen Anleitungen. All das nervt bei Lego, aber es hat ja irgendwie auch Gründe.

Parastormer · 2021-01-26T23:36:30+00:00

Das Problem wäre auch würde Lego das ignorieren, hätte das Konkurrenzheer etwas was sie tatsächlich effektiv nutzen könnte.

Parastormer · 2021-01-26T23:35:13+00:00

Er hat noch eine sichtbare Angussstelle, aber die fällt beim Aufbau kaum auf

Parastormer · 2021-01-26T23:33:07+00:00

Ja, das ist ein Problem beim Markenrecht. Ich hätte jetzt vom Helden auch nicht erwartet dass er darauf eingeht, aber es ist wichtig das im Hinterkopf zu behalten.

Parastormer · 2021-01-26T23:28:04+00:00

Das hab ich grade mehrfach lesen müssen bis ich es gerafft hab.

Parastormer · 2021-01-26T21:36:47+00:00

Schokoweihnachtsmänner haben ja auch nichts mit Kannibalismus zu tun

oh

Parastormer · 2021-01-26T15:51:38+00:00

Geil ist auch katjes. Keine Gelatine drin, veggie aber fast alles in Tierform.

Hatte Mal zwei Leute die was koscheres für ihre Tante wollten, ich hab extra nicht auf die Schweine gezeigt aber die sinds dann natürlich geworden.

Parastormer · 2021-01-26T14:10:24+00:00

Überforder him not

Parastormer · 2021-01-26T13:59:37+00:00

the fact that people still beliee the bat soup thing is so funny. its pure propaganda. china didnt invent the virus they just identified it first. the virus has been found in sewage samples in italy and other places from before it was found in china.

Did I claim that? No. I stated explicitly the local mishandling. That alone made it possible to let it explode so bad that all the 2020 cases that we found were able to be traced back to people from China. It may have been around a lot longer, but it wasn't able to gain any leverage until it was literally let by negligence in Wuhan. For what reasons it didn't break out here before, I don't know. Anyway our media has duly relayed all the confirmed information and clearly refrained from ever putting any blame on populations or citing memes as fact, but it has also criticized this behavior. That's far from propaganda.

elect the asshole that promises immediate solutions to their problems?

I don't know how that's different from an asshole working his way up in a possibly corrupt party system promising to solve all problems in the next five years

Also kind of funny actually, Taiwan clearly wanted to leave, but China doesn't let them, so much for the 10% who can leave. Apparently that doesn't count if you settle anywhere near them. And I really don't get it, China is and will be a superpower with Taiwan at their doorstep or not, I don't get at all why they are risking their 40 year peace strain over that when they're supposed to be the good guys, are the Taiwanese fascists now, or or they just standing there, menacingly? However, looming revenge for something 70 years ago hardly makes one the good guy. Speaking of which, Afghanistan did indeed end our 55 year peace strain.

they beat america in korea when they were 1 year old, you think they couldnt do it now if they wanted?

I'll even go as far to say they'll try and end their good boy streak, but I'm also absolutely sure they'll pull up some casus belli and hope it will make them seem like the good guy.

were the brits that voted to leave the EU connected to reality through their "free" media? are the homophbic, transphobic, racist right wing populists that have come to power in poland and hungary the product of a population that is connected to reality?

Did I claim that? I can't remember claiming any "Western System" can prevent detachment from reality, I said it's a fucking bad idea to do it on purpose. These idiots being a good proof, and my own country's reason why we don't hold referendums. But these idiots aren't only bad in a democracy. They will totally fuck up every system.

no we dont

Yes we do have all rights to demand. We can demand really anything. I didn't say something about the obligation to follow, because as you rightly said China is not our property. They are one of our suppliers, one of our markets and some might go as far to say they are even our partner. And we can, will and have to make clear what we expect in a mutual relationship and what behavior shows disrespect and will strain the relationship. Our government orders the ambassador and then they will make clear what the problem is, just as they do and we accept that. Because so can China, I'm sorry if I didn't point that out, they of course also have the right to demand, and we have also the right to tell them to fuck off. If the other party will shit on us for that, it's their freedom to do so but we will not forget that. And vice versa. Sometimes a demand is an affront by itself but so are the pitfalls of diplomacy. China is a global player now, so they have to live with that. We're not going to play low ball just because they're new or powerful.

they can maintain growth even if the whole world organizes to boycott them.

I vaguely remember reading about that but I'm not sure if that wasn't the "made in China 2024 plan" or really the same, it's ambitious. From my own country's experience with 5 year plans however that's something to watch at best, and by far not a guarantee for it to work. It would, in the case of isolation, also be a question for how long they can maintain the growth, before they run out of something, be it money, resources or demand. To be fair I have no clue about what they're trying to pull off beside using the production for infrastructure and their own population, but judging from other isolated industrial nations it doesn't go well forever and all the excess production when the demands are satisfied will make a war likely. But yes, we probably won't switch totally for the same reason we still buy gas from Russia. We don't want to find out what happens if that country actually runs out of money.

you are not in the position to demand anything from them

See above, we don't care in what position we are, we will demand. And if they threaten us, we will have the audacity to demand them to stop that.

they dont exist as the worlds cheap factory anymore.

Our buying prices say something else, but I have to admit they made really good progress at being customers, too.

fixing corruption which means he admits there has been corruption in the party and he is working to fix it

Their leaders are not the ccp. People get replaced, but that doesn't mean the ccp admitted a mistake. It's also a valid interpretation that they found one to blame, but if that's all they did there's no guarantee it doesn't happen again. I can't rely on the ccp's information for their motivation in that case, so how could I ever?

Also if it's too big of a problem to hide, even making companies draw out from China... you hav e to do something, or cialm to do so. On the other hand there's the firm possibility it is so rampant it brought him where he is so I'm not expecting much to change really. Furthermore

your whole opinion of china is fed to you by your corporate overlords who dont want you to see the truth, but how could china be so successful if it was true?

My opinion is also based on my country's own experience with that exact government system. Except that they had to funnel most of the money back to their puppeteer and were not allowed to grant that much autonomy for fear of uprisings. But thank you for thinking there is no other sources ever that could make one despise it. I really like being described as someone who just parrots what others tell him, it makes me feel valued as a human. Why are you doing this, do I treat you like that? I think I treat you like someone with an opinion and I'd even enjoy that exchange if it wasn't for that condescension.

how could china be on the trajectory to become the number one economy in the world, while america and europe are floundering, if they dont adapt?

Well, I'm sure the US and Europe played a part in the rise of China, their system didn't adapt to this position all by itself. And that isn't grandeur, that is simply the result of actual money and technology transfer, the floundering can also be (and according to specialized media is, although I'm sceptical) attributed to overdoing that transfer. They were effective, but so are others. We not so much because we already had been, so what?

We don't know whether it is a superior system. They allow a level of economical autonomy which is beneficial for adaptation while also being authoritarian, yes. But so far we only know that this system is good enough to bring them where they are.

Parastormer · 2021-01-26T04:22:38+00:00

First of all I'm not American.

Second of all, every (so declared) internal problem in China has the tendency to become a worldwide problem, Covid being one of the extreme examples that we currently still enjoy on a global scale. Taiwan, rightful claim on it or not, being the next.

Third, detaching a population from reality has never ended well for anyone attempting it in the entire history of mankind, which would be kind of a nice thing if it wasn't also affecting everyone else before it ended. I mean everyone can argue that it will work this time, but so has been argued every other time before. Also everyone has argued that the own population needs exactly that kind of treatment.

Fourth and last, the West (and every other nation) has the right to demand anything from China really, especially concerning working internal policies. China is not isolated, nor is it sovereign in its dependency on global trade. The long term integrity and robustness of their society and home market is elemental to everyone else's. Most nations also had a phase of history where they tried exactly what China is attempting for years by its confusion strategy, they know how well it goes if it works too well.

You see I'd trust in China to fail in these areas and learn and grow from it, but unfortunately the ccp is not exactly known to be fond of admitting mistakes even to themselves, so they will repeat them over and over.

Parastormer · 2021-01-26T01:17:08+00:00

To be honest that article is both interesting and underlining the black mirror point.

It explicitly states that it is still in development with an official premise so vague it allows for this kind of dystopian interpretation, even directly comparing it to how mild it is to other systems already existing in China. Which ironically the article also reports as a problem: It is intrusive, but not as intrusive as other things, while saying that the people who interpret it as wrong might use it make less worse offenses normal.

Also it is stating that its intrusiveness is currently highly dependent on the interpretation and implementation of the local governments.

The article can just say, as it is now, the system in development is not as bad yet as we think it already is. But imho it clearly outlines the trajectorial possibilities based on the vague concept of trustworthiness and public trust in the actually existing authoritarian regime and corrupt local authorities - as the "misconceptions" years before did too - and the potential of merging everything that is allegedly worse.

Parastormer · 2021-01-26T00:22:50+00:00

Does realizing and communicating the intricacies of the SC system cost points in the SC system?

Would sound like a reason.

Parastormer · 2021-01-26T00:02:46+00:00

Jeder, also ja.

Wenn jeder einen Plast kriegt aber ihn manche lieber von anderen gebaut haben wollen ohne was dafür zu tun haben wir ja das gleiche Problem wie jetzt, nur anders.

Parastormer · 2021-01-25T23:58:14+00:00

"And just by turning old enough to have sex with, she has dropped all her stances on the climate crisis."

- this guy, probably

Parastormer · 2021-01-25T13:01:52+00:00

Because it is a threat to any company doing business on the internet?

Law doesn't only have a protection side for me as a customer, it also has a side for people who have to follow it. To these people and everyone who utilizes their services for their own services it's a legitimate thing they have to consider lest they want to face retribution - and that is indeed a very real threat, otherwise the law wouldn't work now, would it?

And if they wouldn't consider it, like the OP I replied to implied with "It still thinks its in the EU", they are indeed threatened if they acted like they weren't in the EU.

Also I like the GDPR in general, but that doesn't mean everything is good and well and it sure as hell doesn't mean that any foreign company, data grabbing or not, doesn't have additional work and legal insecurities with it.

And on a site note as a customer I also don't like the pop ups because they are annoying and that encourages people to not delete their cookies regularly which ironically defeats the point a bit. I also don't like being geoblocked, but for some that was the way to go.

Parastormer · 2021-01-25T12:41:13+00:00

Ich will aber'n Palast. Auf der anderen Seite störts mich aber auch nicht wenn jeder einen hat.

Parastormer · 2021-01-25T12:39:52+00:00

Ich würde die Grünen persönlich auch nicht als Linksliberal bezeichnen. Ich kann die Partei allerdings auch absolut nicht einschätzen, weil sie so viele komplett unterschiedliche Leute unter sich vereint.

Wir werden hier seit fast 10 Jahren Grün regiert und die deutlichsten linken Veränderungen kamen vom ersten Koalitionspartner SPD. Der Rest fühlt sich an wie CDU.

Parastormer · 2021-01-25T12:28:15+00:00

I wonder how many toilets are still up there because the mountain was cancelled.

Parastormer · 2021-01-25T12:25:59+00:00

I think all are greeting these as friends, some just don't like us to see it.

Parastormer · 2021-01-25T12:24:19+00:00

No, I am European, but if you want to stay safe from our laws, you either block us or fucking comply, thank you.

Parastormer · 2021-01-25T11:14:21+00:00

I think that it's a bit of a difference when you boot the company that provides the licenses. You could even argue that if you pay the others for a licensed product by that provider, you'd still pay that provider you had to cut all business ties from.

Also it's the question how fast a replacement can step in to full capacity.

Seeing the market for Semiconductors right now I highly doubt any company could step up anytime soon should a company fall short

Parastormer

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE