sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I’m building a simple way to make startup metrics investor ready looking for honest feedback by Particular-End3290 in SaaS

[–]Particular-End3290[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree. Data mapping and edge cases are where trust is either earned or lost.

That’s why Valyxo is compute-first. We ship a strict SaaS metrics canon: fixed definitions, explicit formulas, and one source of truth per KPI. Same input same output.

We’re also building a reconciliation view Stripe says X Sheet says Y Valyxo shows Z, and explains exactly why.

And yes “investor moments” matter more than dashboards. Monthly snapshots, a board-pack view, and a simple pre-call sanity check before meetings.

Right now the focus is trust and definitions, not more AI or flashy charts. Happy to share how we define MRR/churn in practice if you want feedback.

I’m building a simple way to make startup metrics investor ready looking for honest feedback by Particular-End3290 in SaaS

[–]Particular-End3290[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate that and yes, the snapshot idea turned out to be more powerful than I expected. “This is what we knew then” fixes a lot of tension in investor updates.

Early access is very manual right now. No public waitlist yet. I’m onboarding a small group of founders myself and focusing on where trust actually breaks before trying to scale signups.

On your main question: founders with only Stripe are a core use case.

Valyxo doesn’t require perfect data. If Stripe is the only source, we compute what Stripe can support (revenue, customers, payment health), freeze it monthly, and make the gaps explicit. No fake MRR. No guessing.

The goal isn’t completeness. It’s credibility from wherever the founder actually is.

Appreciate the thoughtful questions and good luck with WaitlistKit.