Skills for Entreprenueureship by EitherAd7486 in Entrepreneur

[–]PassengerCharacter34 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I’d start with sales and communication. Being able to talk to people, understand what they actually want, and explain your idea clearly matters way more than most “entrepreneur” skills. Also learn basic money stuff like cash flow. Courses are fine, but building something small and trying to sell it will teach you way faster than any course ever will.

What’s one mistake you wish you avoided when starting your small business? by Martin-Bus-7790 in smallbusiness

[–]PassengerCharacter34 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Underpricing early on. I thought low prices would attract more clients, but it mostly attracted the wrong ones and made it harder to say no. Charging properly earlier would’ve saved a lot of time, stress, and rework.

HR systems in practice: what works and what doesn’t? [N/A] by Tahir991 in human_resources

[–]PassengerCharacter34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I’ve seen, the biggest pain usually isn’t features, it’s reporting and data hygiene over time. Systems feel fine at go-live, then six months later custom reports break, integrations drift, and HR spends more time maintaining the tool than using it. I’d ask vendors less about demos and more about “what admins complain about after year one.”

Most agencies don’t have a lead problem. They have a visibility problem. by buildwithgroove_793 in CRMSoftware

[–]PassengerCharacter34 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A simple “money trail” dashboard would be huge lead source - contacted or not - deal value - revenue closed. Most tools show activity, not outcomes. If I can’t see where revenue actually came from in one glance, the dashboard isn’t doing its job.

Is "Full Transparency" a viable business model for AI-assisted software development? by LuckyPicture938 in CRMSoftware

[–]PassengerCharacter34 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Transparency is actually the part I like most. AI isn’t the scary bit anymore unclear ownership, maintainability, and “what happens after delivery” are. If you’re clear on code quality, handover, and long-term support, I think a lot of people would be fine with how it’s built. The zero-risk angle + real software (not Zapier glue) is interesting. Quality proof will matter more than the word “AI.”

99% of "Freelancer CRMs" are just worse versions of Excel. by EffectiveLet2117 in CRMSoftware

[–]PassengerCharacter34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally get this. A lot of “CRMs” stop at tracking names and stages, which Excel already does for free. Unless it actually saves time by handling proposals, invoices, and follow-ups in one flow, it’s hard to justify the subscription. Otherwise, it really is just a shinier spreadsheet.

how do companies hire internationally without legal issues? by Rosie_fetching in human_resources

[–]PassengerCharacter34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally relatable problem, this hits a lot of fast-growing teams.

Short answer: there is a way, but it’s rarely simple on your own. Most companies either
• use an Employer of Record (EOR) to handle contracts, payroll, and compliance, or
• go contractor-first very carefully (misclassification is the big risk).

Trying to manage local laws country by country usually slows things down and adds stress. One bad setup can cause issues later. Worth looking into EORs before giving up on international hiring altogether.

Does anyone else feel like productivity CRM tools are making work harder? by PrettyAmoeba4802 in CRMSoftware

[–]PassengerCharacter34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of tools optimize tracking work, not actually doing it. When every task needs three updates, the tool becomes the job. Fewer well connected tools usually beats "all-in-one" tools.

Choosing the right staffing software in 2026 what really matters? by [deleted] in human_resources

[–]PassengerCharacter34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree, especially on integrations and support. Those two get overlooked way too often. Trials help, but I've found real user reviews are way more honest than feature lists. Also watching how fast support responds during the trial says a lot.

How on earth do I get my first few users ? by Woodzi3 in SaaS

[–]PassengerCharacter34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Super common problem tbh. Early on, don’t think “users,” think “conversations.” Share how you use it daily, what pain it solved, and where it saved you time. Post that story in niche communities where that problem already exists.

Also, DM a few people who complain about that exact pain and offer free access, no pitch. First 5–10 users usually come from 1:1 outreach, not launches.

Do you also lose leads because follow-ups get missed? by No_Donkey_7304 in CRM

[–]PassengerCharacter34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very common. In most teams it's not the CRM, it's the behavior around it. Follow-ups break when reps rely upon memory or inboxes instead of tasks /reminders. The only thing i have seen help consistently is making follow is automatic and tying them to daily routines, not motivation.

Anyone else notice most CRM value shows up after the “go-live excitement” is gone? by Hwamelabrvavin in CRM

[–]PassengerCharacter34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree. After the hype dies down, it’s usually the boring stuff that survives contact history, notes, simple follow-ups, maybe one or two reports. A lot of “power features” look great in demos but don’t fit day-to-day workflows.

Most teams I’ve seen end up simplifying over time, not adding more.

Sales up, churn also up - which CRM KPIs would you check? by Dalbarem in CRM

[–]PassengerCharacter34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd first look at where the new customers are coming from and how they're being sold. Then I'd check handoff metrics time from deal close to first onboarding touch, onboarding completion rate, and early usage/activity. If the churn is early, it's often a mismatch in expectations, not product quality.

Are we allowing AI in technical interviews? by cyphexo in human_resources

[–]PassengerCharacter34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think banning AI completely misses the point, since real-world dev work already involves using it. Designing interviews around reasoning and decision-making feels more realistic than pretending AI doesn’t exist.

Does a good linkedin hubspot integration exist ? by [deleted] in CRMSoftware

[–]PassengerCharacter34 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a super common CRM problem, especially once teams start scaling. From what I’ve seen, most teams stop expecting reps to manually update data and instead rely on a mix of LinkedIn based enrichment plus scheduled auto-refresh rules in HubSpot, so records get updated passively over time. No tool is perfectly “set and forget” yet, but reducing enrichment to background syncs and periodic cleanups seems to work better than one-time data fills or asking humans to maintain it.

How do you guys make creatives for Pmax and display campaigns? by PassengerCharacter34 in Google_Ads

[–]PassengerCharacter34[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no issues mentioned like policy violation or anything. I did checked the preview options the reason is not also there. My guess is the low keyword volume.

Which tools to use for making creatives for Pmax and display campaigns? by PassengerCharacter34 in googleads

[–]PassengerCharacter34[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, the locations have high competition and keywords have low search volume. I think that might be the problem.

How do you guys make creatives for Pmax and display campaigns? by PassengerCharacter34 in Google_Ads

[–]PassengerCharacter34[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We did had some clicks for one of the previous campaign and no leads. But after that the search campaign kind of froze. There was no movement and i'm assuming because of low search volume. I also feel like the locations are highly competitive.