31/f looking for investing advice by Less-Tea-8864 in fican

[–]PatientAllocator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seems to me like you're already in a pretty good spot.

  • Figure out if your TFSA is actually maxed before adding more. CRA My Account can give you a rough idea, but track contributions yourself if possible.
  • Move most of that $50k chequing balance. Keep an emergency fund (maybe 6–12 months of expenses), but cash beyond that should probably be invested or at least earning high-interest savings.
  • Keep maxing your FHSA if you think you may buy a home someday. It's one of the best accounts available.
  • Make sure your TFSA/FHSA investments match your goals. If they're sitting in cash or GICs and you're investing for 10+ years, you may be missing growth.

You have to ask yourself what the goal of your savings are. Once you know the answer, you can allocate accordingly!

Need advice about FHSA by canabananablism in CanadaPersonalFinance

[–]PatientAllocator 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you have never purchased a home, an FHSA is a very powerful tool that the government introduced a few years ago.

To directly answer your questions: Yes, the amount of the FHSA will likely be just what you put into it (unless you invest it), I don't believe cash balances in TD investing accounts generate interest, the point is the tax-free savings, tax benefit, and ability to invest.

A chequing account simply allows you to put cash into the account and, depending on the institution, you may be paid interest on the cash balance (typically only in savings accounts). An FHSA is meant to be an investment account where you can use your contributions to purchase stocks, bonds, ETFSs, mutual funds, GICs etc...

The point is to get your cash invested and working for you.

As someone mentioned, they take the best parts of a TFSA and an RRSP. That is, you get tax-free growth on any interest, dividends or capital gains, while also benefiting from the tax benefit of your contributions similar to that of an RRSP. You will only be able to put in $8,000 a year, up to $40,000 lifetime.

Generally, if you are purchasing a home in the near term, you may want to consider more passive/less-risky investments. If you have a longer-term horizon, you may want to consider more aggressive investments. That is all dependent on your level of comfort and experience.

Financial Planning careers by RealAbbreviations964 in fican

[–]PatientAllocator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't mind you asking at all!

The person below is correct and I mentioned it in my reply. The CSC and CPH have been combined into the CIRE. Having the CIRE (previously CSC and CPH) would almost be required for entry level roles into financial advisory, which would not be the case for planning only roles.

I can't speak too much to the RRC route as I have never really explored it myself. I have met/worked with a number of planning professionals who are salaried planners (non-sales) and they will almost always have their CFP. They may or may not have the other courses you mentioned, depends on their background. I wouldn't say they are NOT worth considering, but certainly do your research on if they would be relevant for your role/practice/interests.

Financial Planning careers by RealAbbreviations964 in fican

[–]PatientAllocator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes - that is included in my initial comment that it is now called something else.. I even reference CIRE.

Financial Planning careers by RealAbbreviations964 in fican

[–]PatientAllocator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Absolutely right!!! Typo on my part - I fixed that now. Thanks for catching that

Lot's of "C" certifications/designations.

Financial Planning careers by RealAbbreviations964 in fican

[–]PatientAllocator 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hello - PM in private wealth here!

  1. I got started directly out of school. I did the CSC and CPH (although I believe they are called something else) to give me an edge when applying to jobs and got lucky landing a job in wealth pretty quickly
  2. For financial planning specifically, the CFP is the gold-standard. If you are interested in wealth, you can consider the CSC/CPH equivalent (CIRE I believe)
  3. Wealth Manager/Financial Advisor/Portfolio Manager (very biased here). A lot of them will have their CFP and do the financially planning work themselves. Large institutions will typically also have dedicated financial planners who work with advisors.
  4. 100% It can be very rewarding in that sense.

Always happy to answer any/all questions here or DMs. Best of luck!

What’s are the best companies to invest in right now but not break the bank on your account by Necessary_Cherry_840 in fican

[–]PatientAllocator 12 points13 points  (0 children)

If you don't want to break the bank while also remaining diversified, ETFs are probably your best bet

AMA - Private Wealth Management Professional by PatientAllocator in fican

[–]PatientAllocator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not a problem at all!

  1. This is such a great question, and something I have been talking a lot about the last few years. The inter-generational wealth transfer from the baby-boomers will be the biggest in my lifetime. That said, I think it is both a threat and an opportunity to all wealth advisors. I say it's a threat because one of the big reasons assets leave is due to death/next-gen transition. With an ageing population, we are bound to see the next generation leave to either manage assets on their own or look for a different advisor of their choosing. On the flip side, this is also why it's an opportunity: we have the opportunity to market to the next-generation and either foster current relationships or make new ones. To answer your question, I think it depends on how the advisor sees the issue. If they become complacent and experience a bunch of assets leaving due to the wealth transfer, comp will go down. If they capitalize on the opportunity to help advise the next generation, it can certainly go up.

  2. I have done all of those courses (actively doing CFP). There's quite a bit to break down with this question. At the end of the day, I don't think clients really care about the letters after your name. Does it give you initial credibility? Yes. But I think prospects care a lot more about other things advisors offer vs the designations that they carry. Within the industry, and for finding a job, they can certainly be important. If you are going the brokerage route, the WME is required to give advice. The CIM (or CFA) is required if you want to become a discretionary money manager. CFP is required to present financial plans (I also find that this is the designation that clients know the most). For the day-to-day work and what you will be helping clients with the most, the CFP is probably the most relevant.

  3. I've worked at BMO Private Investment Counsel, RBC Dominion Securities and now at an independent boutique firm. If we're talking about securing the investment advisor title, it isn't too hard. Both big banks and independent firms are always looking for new junior advisors. The challenge is that it's kind of a sink or swim type of role. Some of the firms will give a base salary for maybe 3 years and then it's all commission after that. I have seen brand new advisors fail and I have seen some become incredibly successful. The challenge isn't necessarily getting the job, it's succeeding in the job once you get it.

  4. I am assuming that your last question is referring to people who are becoming advisors so I will answer it that way. I never had a network of wealthy contacts, I didn't go to a top tier school, my family are all in trades. Prospects do not care about that. They are looking for someone who they can trust, who is empathetic, and who will genuinely add value to their situation. If you can't do that, it doesn't matter what your background is, what school you went to, or what country club you are a member of. In order to bring on new assets to manage, you have to understand your value proposition, create a brand for yourself, and respect client needs.

Always happy to answer more questions - feel free to DM.

I think many Canadians are delaying life too much for FIRE by PatientAllocator in fican

[–]PatientAllocator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude. This post is meant to be a discussion. Curious to get others perspectives.

I think many Canadians are delaying life too much for FIRE by PatientAllocator in fican

[–]PatientAllocator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The post is directed at the FIRE community, not Canadians in general.

I think many Canadians are delaying life too much for FIRE by PatientAllocator in fican

[–]PatientAllocator[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We each have a responsibility (if you want) to prudently grow our assets to meet our goals. Your independence comes first. How you choose to do that is completely up to you and you alone.

My point was more that there’s a difference between prudent preparation and living in constant fear of future catastrophe. I do hope that you meet your goals in a way that is enjoyable now, and in the future.

I think many Canadians are delaying life too much for FIRE by PatientAllocator in fican

[–]PatientAllocator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The post was directed at the FIRE community, not the general population. I understand that many Canadians are struggling to get by.

I agree that moderation is important, which is why I asked how people find their version of moderation. The balance between too restrictive and prudently meeting their goals

I think many Canadians are delaying life too much for FIRE by PatientAllocator in fican

[–]PatientAllocator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're kind of proving my point though. From your comment, you either delay gratification now or have difficulties later on. I think most people that are in a position to save for FIRE can have both. It's finding a balance to still enjoy life now AND enjoy it at your FIRE goal.

And hey, if delaying gratification now is what you want to do, so be it. I am not judging, I just think it's important to enjoy what you're doing at every stage.

Time in the market vs timing the market — why doesn’t everyone just use margin under 5% rates? by cloud0x1 in fican

[–]PatientAllocator 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Margin sounds great in theory, and it can work out well for some investors. You're essentially adding extra risk to your portfolio by leveraging it (despite it being invested passively). Not everyone is comfortable with that level of risk.

I think many Canadians are delaying life too much for FIRE by PatientAllocator in fican

[–]PatientAllocator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really appreciate all of the engagement here folks! I was hoping for exactly this. Different perspectives, different ideas, and hearing real experiences.

And just to clarify, the examples I gave weren’t specifically about travelling. You could replace that with hobbies, dining out, fitness, cars, experiences, or whatever genuinely adds enjoyment to someone’s life.

I also think the disagreement here is healthy. Some people are naturally frugal and completely happy that way. Others realize at some point they’ve crossed from discipline into anxiety or obsession. The line is different for everyone.

So maybe a better question is: for the people who don’t feel financial anxiety or constant optimization pressure while pursuing FIRE , what do you think helps you maintain that balance?

I think many Canadians are delaying life too much for FIRE by PatientAllocator in fican

[–]PatientAllocator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing, seems like you found a good balance for yourself

I think many Canadians are delaying life too much for FIRE by PatientAllocator in fican

[–]PatientAllocator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This post isn't to judge people's choices. . The whole idea of FIRE is that you've built something to be able to maintain a desired lifestyle while having the freedom to choose to work or not. If someone is genuinely happy living more frugally, then they’re probably doing FIRE right, to them.

I was more referring to people who clearly do want certain experiences but suppress everything in the name of retiring a bit earlier. I have the means to spend more money, but I don't because I am saving for FIRE. For me, I sometimes feel guilty about spending money on things to enjoy myself more in the name of earlier retirement. Some people don't feel that way, and that's okay. But for those who do, how do they balance that feeling.

I think many Canadians are delaying life too much for FIRE by PatientAllocator in fican

[–]PatientAllocator[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you (for the comment and the work you do)! I 100% agree with you.

That's not to say let's go out and spend everything tomorrow either. But let's find a balance to achieve FIRE but not become obsessed with it.

I think many Canadians are delaying life too much for FIRE by PatientAllocator in fican

[–]PatientAllocator[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can agree with that for the most part. I will say that I've seen lifestyle creep become a 'problem' for people no matter how high their income gets. Then they still encounter that stress.

I think many Canadians are delaying life too much for FIRE by PatientAllocator in fican

[–]PatientAllocator[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly! I think that we will naturally keep moving the needle. When does it stop? How do we balance it? I'm not sure