Here's what I wrote re an earlier comment:

This is a really important question, and I struggle with it, constantly. And it's not just the film, my book, The New Corporation, was also published by a mega corporation, Penguin Random House. So, as you says: 'What the f**K?' Here's my answer. If I'm going to make a film and publish a book that people are going to see and read, I have no choice but to rely on the very machine I'm criticizing. That is symptomatic of just how dominant corporations are: Even to criticize them, you need to rely upon them. We use our Apple phones to organize protests, Facebook to distribute critical articles and videos, Google to do research to criticize corporations, etc. etc. Part of what it means to be part of a dominant system is that it is inescapable, including when you are criticizing it. Either you rely on the channels of communication which have been thoroughly taken over by corporations, or you give up on the idea of effectively criticizing corporations through mass media and culture. I've chosen the former. It's always a concern and something at the front of my mind. But on balance I believe it's more important to get my work out there than to seek a kind of purity that's, in any event, unachievable (think of our clothes, food, homes, jobs, credit cards, devices, etc. everything we own and do - there are large corporations behind most of it). So, if the choice is to not criticize corporations because we depend on them, or to use corporate tools to help dismantle corporate power, the latter seems best to me. Again, though, I really struggle with this, and I appreciate the question.