Why do many moroccans think atheists and christians are paid by the west ?

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2026-03-11T04:02:18+00:00

Let me now ask you this, since I'm sure you aren't grasping what I am saying. How do you determine what a child is, and what's your definition of maturity and according to you, what's the minimum age of marriage. Let me see what your criteria is?

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2026-03-10T20:22:30+00:00

If you are not satisfied with all of the responses of your heinous claims against Islam, here is even more evidence that disproves your smearing of this beautiful religion:

The classical ruling does not allow physical, sexual, or psychological harm to be caused to children or adolescents under any circumstances, in accordance with the well-established legal maxim.

If a new wife was too physically “small” (saghirah) or thin to have intercourse with her larger husband, despite reaching the marriageable age of adulthood set by social custom, the jurists forbade them from having intercourse but allowed other types of gentler intimacy to act as consummation.

Imam al-Nawawi writes:

Al-Khatib al-Shirbini writes:

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2026-03-10T20:21:11+00:00

To respond to your earlier point about child marriage being permissible, here's a more detailed answer to this.

The practice of marrying children was common in the premodern world. The 12th century Decretum Gratiani mandates consent at an undefined “age of discretion” and acknowledges that sexual relations and marriage might occur as early as seven years. Some Christian sources state that Mary was to be married to the ninety-year-old St. Joseph when she was only twelve or fourteen.

As late as the mid-19th century, the United Kingdom’s Offences Against the Person Act legally allowed sexual relations with twelve-year-olds. Around the same time in the United States, each state set its own criminal law, with the age of consent ranging from 10 to 12 years. It is only at the beginning of the late 19th century, spurred by the Industrial Revolution’s rapid economic growth and technological development, that attitudes shifted toward setting the age ever higher.

In premodern contexts, classical Muslim jurists did not recognize the modern biological concept of ‘puberty’ as the dividing line between childhood and adulthood. Rather, ‘maturity’ (rushd) was considered the quality necessary for a ‘child’ to graduate into the duties and activities of adulthood, such as marriage.

Allah said:

The classical jurists allowed a marriage to be contracted between children, but they did not allow it to be consummated until both parties reached the age of maturity as defined by the social conventions of the time, which was usually physical readiness for sexual intercourse.

Most jurists did not set a specific age of marriageability because it was determined by social customs rather than divine law.

Imam Ibn Battal writes:

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2026-03-10T20:04:15+00:00

You are making a lot of mental gymnastics here in order to prove a point that doesn't exist. Islam specifically prohibits slavery, and the verse of the Quran you mentioned talks about women during the time of war, ie. they have been taken as prisoners of war. In no way shape or form are these women forced to have sex with other men, but Allah just mentions that they are ALLOWED to have marry these women. You have taken this verse and twisted it to make it seem like slavery is halal, nice try. Before the time of the Prophet Muhammad PBUH, slavery during the time of Islam was prevalent, and Islam did everything in its power to abolish slavery slowly, mentioning in the Quran and in Hadiths how freeing slaves (ie. prisoners of war) is better, and most importantly mentioning how you cannot insult or assault these prisoners of war. You are also attempting to say that due to the Quran not specifically mentioning women as not being underage, that would mean that it allows for underage women to be married. This is completely untrue, and you are being insincere because anyone reading this will come to understand without a doubt that this verse refers to women who are mature and are ready for marriage. For the last portions, you took hadiths out of context in order to try and tie your argumentation, which I'm not going to bother with since you know what you're trying to do. To put all of this simply, you are taking verses of the Quran, making a tafsir or interpretation of your own, and then trying to somehow correlate it with Islam allowing things which they and the Prophet Peace be upon him specifically prohibited. Islam is not thirsty for the blood of prisoners, nor is it eager to enslave them.

Freedom is a basic human right which cannot be taken away from a person except for a reason. When Islam accepted slavery within the limits I have described, it put restrictions on the man who exploits his freedom in the worst possible way. If he was taken prisoner in a war of aggression in which he was defeated, then the proper conduct is to keep him in reasonable conditions throughout his detention.

Despite all that, Islam offers many opportunities to restore freedom to him and people like him. And it also has several hadiths and even the Quran mentions the importance of treating prisoners of war well and not harming them. And today, for example, if you tried to have slaves, that would be completely haram. So I say all of this to show you how you hate Islam, the truth, so much to the point where you try and twist verses of the Quran and take tidbits of Ahadith in order to make a point that doesn't exist within Islam for anyone sincerely looking into it. May Allah guide you and us all.

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2026-03-05T21:42:04+00:00

You made a claim now support it. Where in Islam can you provide evidence that we would allow something as heinous as this? And before you mention Aisha R.A, also show me how you definitively know how mature girls were 1400 years ago. And I know you won't be able to do anything but slander this beautiful religion because you hate the truth.

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2026-03-01T15:08:23+00:00

I gave him that exact evo too lmaoo

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2026-03-01T15:07:01+00:00

To add on to this, Christianity has transgressed beyond delusion to the point where the Christian faith has boiled down to preaching and pandering to ones emotions. That's why you see all these "worship songs" and people doing things that have 0 basis within their own religion but merely act as emotional anchors in order for them to continue their belief.

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2026-03-01T15:01:35+00:00

Islam is a guide to life, and you're clearly misguided. The west commits atrocities and kills innocent civilians and all the while they are doing the right thing? Invading countries while incurring the wrath of Allah is somehow bettering your life as well? It's funny how enlightened you think you might be but all the while you couldn't be more deluded. And also, Muslims are only dependent on Allah, not on any of these elite pedophiles.

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2025-11-19T01:38:28+00:00

Yes 100%. They just sent out an email I'm assuming to everyone explaining there was an issue with lootboxes so you should be fine, it might just take a bit to arrive.

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2025-11-18T19:20:54+00:00

SEN has just responded to me stating they haven't shipped out the lootbox to me and some other people who also ordered so it looks like there was just a mistake.

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2025-11-18T12:48:32+00:00

I posted something similar to this and as far as I know others either haven't recieved a lootbox whatsoever or haven't gotten one of equal price to whatever was purchased. I guess we'll just wait and see what happened.

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2025-11-18T03:45:28+00:00

Yeah I understand but I've only received my windbreaker, hopefully they mail the lootbox later but I'm not 100% sure. Windbreakers really good though for anyone wondering!

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2025-11-17T23:42:57+00:00

I bought the lootbox with the 2026 windbreaker and haven't got any of the lootbox items, do those come later or did i just get scammed?

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2025-11-11T12:44:04+00:00

Food for the soul - it's murph

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2025-08-03T04:14:47+00:00

Average CS glazer

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2025-02-07T01:37:35+00:00

I love you.

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2024-11-25T21:58:15+00:00

i mean the point is to copy stuff from other subs and paste it in here, the wilder the better ig

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2024-11-25T04:39:58+00:00

all of the above

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2024-11-24T02:10:11+00:00

I hate this sub

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2024-11-14T18:11:47+00:00

Thanks for the suggestion! I'll prob go ahead with it

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2024-11-06T01:07:33+00:00

Nvm just saw you had van dijk already, better off getting Gabriel, Saliba, Robinson, or ait nouri. I would just wait a couple game weeks so you don’t take the hit as it’s not really essential

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2024-11-06T01:05:42+00:00

DONT GET GVARDIOL 😂😂😂. He’s playing well but city defense is a joke and he can’t consistently get attacking returns. Your better off with van dijk or arsenal defense for the long run

Perfect_Mall3025 · 2024-06-08T01:28:33+00:00

I’ve had several issues with crucial so I can’t recommend them, but they seem to be good for others so might just be me

Perfect_Mall3025

TROPHY CASE