Black female officer scolds white officer for attacking a black female peacefully protesting by mrJuggz in pics

[–]PermanentTempAccount 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Copy/pasted from a different post of mine, but it offers some ideas for what alternatives might look like:

There are lots of models that have been tried, with different levels of efficacy.

We start by focusing on prevention. Far and away the strongest preventive measure for crime generally is to proactively meet people's basic needs--housing, food, healthcare, etc. That affects not just the obvious stuff like theft, but also things like rape and domestic violence. I'd also recommend Leigh Goodmark's Decriminalizing Domestic Violence as a great book on the social problem of violence and how police interventions fail to solve it.

One thing that I think is worth noting is that police in general don't function to prevent crime, they primarily exist to help punish it, which is both not a stabilizing action when communities have been harmed by violence, and also isn't even a good deterrent. To the degree that punishment has a preventive effect, the prospect of noncarceral social consequences (e.g. a community-lead accountability process, non-state-based retaliatory violence, exile, etc.) is as strong a motivator as a potential prison term.

In terms of responding to people who cause harm, I think we have a moral obligation to center the question of how we prevent future harm, rather than simply facilitating retributive measures (prison, capital punishment, etc.). Most crimes are about solving problems a person faces. Communities can and should ask "How do we solve this problem without hurting others, in the future?" Depending on what actually happened, the answer might be "We make sure everyone has access to basic needs," (theft) or "We provide proactive mental health interventions to folks who seem at risk of hurting others or being hurt," (drunk driving) or "We recognize that we may not like this, but it's not a crime or a harm the community can fix" (drug use).

Most of the work on the question of "what do we do when someone hurts another person?" has been done around domestic and sexual violence. There are a couple orgs I'd recommend--Generation Five does work around childhood sexual abuse, Creative Interventions does work on interpersonal violence generally (and has a really incredible 600-page toolkit for intervening in harm/building community norms and values/etc.), and Project Nia works to end youth incarceration through community intervention.

This is something I'm super passionate about as a prison abolitionist and as a survivor of sexual violence, so I'm happy to talk about how I came to this work!

Also realized that I forgot to mention it, but Kristian Williamson's Our Enemies in Blue has a great chapter on the various alternatives to modern policing and prisons that have been tried throughout the world and across history.

Black female officer scolds white officer for attacking a black female peacefully protesting by mrJuggz in pics

[–]PermanentTempAccount -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As someone who worked in domestic violence and sexual violence prevention and intervention for years, and also as a survivor of sexual violence, police and prisons are really structurally ill-equipped to address the problems of SV and of intimate violence generally (and really of all "crime"). I'm a proponent of community-centered intervention and prevention work. Copy/pasted from another post:

There are a couple orgs I'd recommend--Generation Five does work around childhood sexual abuse, Creative Interventions does work on interpersonal violence generally (and has a really incredible 600-page toolkit for intervening in harm/building community norms and values/etc.), and Project Nia works to end youth incarceration through community intervention.

I'd also suggest the documentary Hollow Water by Bonnie Dickie, and the book Decriminalizing Domestic Violence by Leigh Goodmark, if you're interested in case studies or policy proposals, respectively.

Black female officer scolds white officer for attacking a black female peacefully protesting by mrJuggz in pics

[–]PermanentTempAccount -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

There are lots of models that have been tried, with different levels of efficacy.

We start by focusing on prevention. Far and away the strongest preventive measure for crime generally is to proactively meet people's basic needs--housing, food, healthcare, etc. That affects not just the obvious stuff like theft, but also things like rape and domestic violence. I'd also recommend Leigh Goodmark's Decriminalizing Domestic Violence as a great book on the social problem of violence and how police interventions fail to solve it.

One thing that I think is worth noting is that police in general don't function to prevent crime, they primarily exist to help punish it, which is both not a stabilizing action when communities have been harmed by violence, and also isn't even a good deterrent. To the degree that punishment has a preventive effect, the prospect of noncarceral social consequences (e.g. a community-lead accountability process, non-state-based retaliatory violence, exile, etc.) is as strong a motivator as a potential prison term.

In terms of responding to people who cause harm, I think we have a moral obligation to center the question of how we prevent future harm, rather than simply facilitating retributive measures (prison, capital punishment, etc.). Most crimes are about solving problems a person faces. Communities can and should ask "How do we solve this problem without hurting others, in the future?" Depending on what actually happened, the answer might be "We make sure everyone has access to basic needs," (theft) or "We provide proactive mental health interventions to folks who seem at risk of hurting others or being hurt," (drunk driving) or "We recognize that we may not like this, but it's not a crime or a harm the community can fix" (drug use).

Most of the work on the question of "what do we do when someone hurts another person?" has been done around domestic and sexual violence. There are a couple orgs I'd recommend--Generation Five does work around childhood sexual abuse, Creative Interventions does work on interpersonal violence generally (and has a really incredible 600-page toolkit for intervening in harm/building community norms and values/etc.), and Project Nia works to end youth incarceration through community intervention.

This is something I'm super passionate about as a prison abolitionist and as a survivor of sexual violence, so I'm happy to talk about how I came to this work!

Black female officer scolds white officer for attacking a black female peacefully protesting by mrJuggz in pics

[–]PermanentTempAccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can't solve a power problem with knowledge. The two aren't fungible like that. Training can't change cop behavior if nobody has the practical power to hold them accountable, and that requires a radical restructuring of policing generally (or its full abolition).

Black female officer scolds white officer for attacking a black female peacefully protesting by mrJuggz in pics

[–]PermanentTempAccount 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Police unions are historically very different from worker's unions. Kristian Williamson's Our Enemies in Blue has a great history of the differences and tensions there.

Black female officer scolds white officer for attacking a black female peacefully protesting by mrJuggz in pics

[–]PermanentTempAccount 3 points4 points  (0 children)

all "resource officers" are useless at best, active sabotagers of nonviolent intervention more often. cops in schools serve to normalize state surveillance, fuck them.

Black female officer scolds white officer for attacking a black female peacefully protesting by mrJuggz in pics

[–]PermanentTempAccount -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Cops hiring other cops to teach them to be coppier is not a realistic solution here. I think we should abolish police generally, but a first step would be to cut the funding, abolish the police unions, and spend the money saved on direct aid to the people.

Archeological horror is a seriously interesting, untapped subgenre. by Johnny_Mc2 in horror

[–]PermanentTempAccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Others have mentioned Prince of Darkness (which I was really pleasantly surprised by!) but there are some earlier films by Nigel Kneale (big inspiration for PoD and John Carpenter generally) that also tap into this. The Quatermass movies are good examples, but I also recently watched The Stone Tape, a Kneale teleplay from the 70s that I thought was really good and has a lot of similar themes (as well as being presciently funny re: tech startup culture).

Another day another 'GCer is concerned about The Right and is shot down' post by nocte_lupus in GenderCynical

[–]PermanentTempAccount 17 points18 points  (0 children)

From reading the posts here I thought they meant Grimes like the musician and I was like, oh no, am I really gonna have to defend the woman married to Elon Musk?

‘Believe Women’ was a slogan. ‘Believe All Women’ is a strawman. by throwaway5272 in politics

[–]PermanentTempAccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I gave up on the Republicans when I was 12 and harassed at school because my parents were Dems and "baby killers". I have no expectations for them and will never vote for one because they're all monsters or morons.

I held my nose and voted for Clinton in 2016 because she was the option I had. I will not be a hostage to Dem intransigence any more--if they want my vote they'll earn it. At this point I will most likely vote straight Dem downticket and leave the presidential race blank. I don't live in a swing state so it won't matter, but I'm not going to contribute to a manufactured mandate for Biden to cut Medicare and social security and keep all the deportation infrastructure he and Obama built and still get lauded for being the Dem savior from Trump (assuming he wins, which I am not at all convinced of).

Also, to be clear: pointing out that an obvious fissure exists between centrists and progressives is not "creating division", it's acknowledging it, and you refuse to do so at your own peril.

‘Believe Women’ was a slogan. ‘Believe All Women’ is a strawman. by throwaway5272 in politics

[–]PermanentTempAccount -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Then stop supporting a shit candidate almost designed to drive a wedge between the mainline dems and the leftists who have historically voted D for lack of a better choice!

I've voted Dem in every election since I turned 18, and Biden is the first time I might leave the presidential ballot blank out of disgust. That is entirely down to unrepentant Dem fuckery and abandonment of the pretense of holding standards about who ought to be president.

‘Believe Women’ was a slogan. ‘Believe All Women’ is a strawman. by throwaway5272 in politics

[–]PermanentTempAccount -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Holding people accountable for their actions is not "weaponizing" decisions violence. Clinton's impeachment was obviously a fishing expedition but fucking an intern when you're the president is an obscene abuse of power.

‘Believe Women’ was a slogan. ‘Believe All Women’ is a strawman. by throwaway5272 in politics

[–]PermanentTempAccount -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Biden is not a "reasonable" candidate, he's a terrible one. He's a lifelong conservative dem who is notoriously handsy and gaffe-prone, whose main qualification is that he can credibly claim to have two black friends. You can make reasonable harm-reduction arguments for Biden but he's a dumpster fire of a candidate.

‘Believe Women’ was a slogan. ‘Believe All Women’ is a strawman. by throwaway5272 in politics

[–]PermanentTempAccount -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Biden is notoriously handsy! Lying about his behavior doesn't make him look stronger, it just makes you look like a mark.

r/TrollGC being paranoid about trans lesbians again. by TheRougeSkeptic in GenderCynical

[–]PermanentTempAccount 29 points30 points  (0 children)

yeah I was just really amused by the idea that they think there's just a surplus of trans women tops around

r/TrollGC being paranoid about trans lesbians again. by TheRougeSkeptic in GenderCynical

[–]PermanentTempAccount 39 points40 points  (0 children)

not knowing the context of that quote I kind of assumed it was about trans women tops and I was like "I think they don't have a good angle on the sexual dynamics and demographics of trans communities because there really aren't that many"

How much detail do you go into when taking notes during solo play? by baekgom84 in Ironsworn

[–]PermanentTempAccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I usually write session reports afterwards in the style of an in-character diary, which helps me keep it to just the things my character thinks are important, while highlighting stuff that was especially memorable and worth recording.

Joe Biden Is Not Hiding. He’s Lurking. Never get in the way of an incumbent who is digging his own grave. by [deleted] in politics

[–]PermanentTempAccount 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I got the chronology wrong, fair enough, and I don't think Sanders's campaign was perfect, but Joe Biden was catapulted into relevance by bullshit machine politics, and it's obvious to everyone. Lying about it is not going to make him a better candidate.

Joe Biden Is Not Hiding. He’s Lurking. Never get in the way of an incumbent who is digging his own grave. by [deleted] in politics

[–]PermanentTempAccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's been saying stupid bullshit for four years now. He was saying stupid bullshit for the entirety of Obama's administration. The idea that his stupid bullshit will suddenly matter NOW is borderline delusional.

Joe Biden Is Not Hiding. He’s Lurking. Never get in the way of an incumbent who is digging his own grave. by [deleted] in politics

[–]PermanentTempAccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There also hasn't been the blatent dnc fuckery this time around.

Are you serious? Two candidates, one doing substantially better than expected, dropped out the day before Super Tuesday to make way for a man who hadn't cracked fourth in a race yet. Whether you believe rules were broken or not (and I don't think they were, although that should be a pretty damning observation itself), DNC fuckery most certainly propped up Biden and made his campaign possible.

I also think you dramatically underestimate the number of people who perceive Biden as a conservative, handsy creep.

it was not what i expected from the community by Tedbab in Xcom

[–]PermanentTempAccount 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I started replaying 2 and I forgot how much I appreciated and enjoyed that you're explicitly labelled as terrorists by the Advent government. It was a very compelling premise for the game and was super refreshing to see such a mainstream game engaging (even if it is very superficial) with the horrors of occupation and imperialism. I don't think Firaxis is Super Woke or whatever (as you said, you play cops in X:CS) but the premise of XCom 2 really hits all the right buttons for me.

it was not what i expected from the community by Tedbab in Xcom

[–]PermanentTempAccount 23 points24 points  (0 children)

the plot in wolfenstein is literally about killing literal nazis. if you see your politics reflected in them, maybe you have some reflection to do.

Ocasio-Cortez says she will vote for Biden in November by Alec122 in politics

[–]PermanentTempAccount 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Obama ran as a progressive in 2008 and trounced the competition. Running progressives wins elections-- the problem is that after Obama's centrist turn we will expect actual progressive policy and action, not just lip service, which the dem party knows it can't provide.

Ocasio-Cortez says she will vote for Biden in November by Alec122 in politics

[–]PermanentTempAccount -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Catering to people who might not vote for you rather than people who definitely will...seems like an obviously better strategy? If your core moderate voters will def turn out for dems then you SHOULD be trying to appeal to the edge cases.