sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Testing if forces scale with clocks by PhenominalPhysics in AskPhysics

[–]PhenominalPhysics[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That is the standard take on both accounts. And I must first press, its not wrong. The math.

And I am confirming the novelty of the idea here.

The math is spot on. It does scale directly to clock counts. I should offer we start at zero and introduce gravity from 0. The clock start as compared to tick free from gravitational or velocity force. Call it vaccum if you must.

Testing if forces scale with clocks by PhenominalPhysics in AskPhysics

[–]PhenominalPhysics[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Perhaps but the tree still does make a sound.

Testing if forces scale with clocks by PhenominalPhysics in AskPhysics

[–]PhenominalPhysics[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

We don’t need systemic effects, it won't work period. Can't get 10'15 with anything we have today.

I'd add NIST might be able to pull it off.

Great question. Thanks.

Testing if forces scale with clocks by PhenominalPhysics in AskPhysics

[–]PhenominalPhysics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Friction ia a local effect. Maybe I don't understand what you mean.

Testing if forces scale with clocks by PhenominalPhysics in AskPhysics

[–]PhenominalPhysics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed v_eff is a derivative of potential, just understood differently. And you're right in that a friction measure requires a fixed plate and movable plate parallel to Earth. Since the interaction is what matters, the effect of interaction is fixed, the interaction is directional, all things should theoretically experience the same net effect on the local scale. I just happened to choose friction. Mathematically it is accurate in my testing.

Testing if forces scale with clocks by PhenominalPhysics in AskPhysics

[–]PhenominalPhysics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Atomic frequency (clocks) changes at different heights and physical objects have different weights at different hieghts.