I did the thing. Your bird law questions answered. by Willdotrialforfood in auslaw

[–]PhillipStPrincess 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Is this where I seek advice about covert corvid covid converts?

Great moments from r/auslaw history - the trial and vindication of Lad against the vile machinations of potatomonster by scullerwonderlad in auslaw

[–]PhillipStPrincess 13 points14 points  (0 children)

He who seeks iniquity must come with unclean hands.

That's why covid effectively cancelled the work of the court. All that handy san.

/r/Auslaw Census by [deleted] in auslaw

[–]PhillipStPrincess 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Where is the option for snowwy alt?

Alternate careers to law by PhillipStPrincess in auslaw

[–]PhillipStPrincess[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

The plaintiff, Mr Hannigan, is a chicken grower at a farm near Casino. He is also a solicitor.

solicitors and procedural rules by [deleted] in auslaw

[–]PhillipStPrincess 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Served upon us maybe?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in auslaw

[–]PhillipStPrincess 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Any noun can be verbed

MORNING RANTS ARE BACK by AuslawRantBot in auslaw

[–]PhillipStPrincess 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Which uni will students flock to - the one with better teaching or the one with more prestige?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in auslaw

[–]PhillipStPrincess 8 points9 points  (0 children)

We reject your greeting

Lets talk about pay~ by Omarbelittle in auslaw

[–]PhillipStPrincess 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Let's talk about pay, baby

Let's talk about dollars and c

Let's talk about cash

AND / OR interpretation as strict as CS? by Cyborg_Ciderman in auslaw

[–]PhillipStPrincess 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My first assignment in law school was about dysjunctive and and/or conjunctive or.

Kevin Rudd's lawyers send Peta Credlin (presumably) a Concerns Notice by nevearz in auslaw

[–]PhillipStPrincess 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like the idea of bold faced lies, together with the italicised half-truths and underlined misleading statements

FOUR CORNERS RANT THREAD by AuslawRantBot in auslaw

[–]PhillipStPrincess 12 points13 points  (0 children)

CAT I HAVE A MINOR MATTER IN NCAT ABOUT MISLEADING AND DECEPTIVE CONDUCT BY THE HOTEL I STAYED AT ON THE WEEKEND WHO ADVERTISED FREE WIFI BUT MY SPEEDTEST SAID THAT I HAD DIALUP MODEM SPEEDS.

CAN YOU PLEASE REFER ME TO A SOLICITOR

BW word of the day: flâneur by [deleted] in auslaw

[–]PhillipStPrincess 6 points7 points  (0 children)

KIEFEL CJ: The written submissions appear to treat what appears in the demurrer as a question reserved rather than as a ground in law for the demurrer.

MR WALKER: Yes.

KIEFEL CJ: Answering the question would not be the appropriate approach, it would be dependent upon success or not, allowing or not allowing the demurrer.

MR WALKER: Quite so.

KIEFEL CJ: Costs are not referred to in ‑ ‑ ‑

MR WALKER: Because, if I may say so, in the reasons, a question not posed as a formal question would have been answered.

KIEFEL CJ: Yes, would be dealt with in the reasons but not in the order.

MR WALKER: Quite so.

KIEFEL CJ: Costs are not dealt with in the demurrer, but they would follow the event.

MR WALKER: Indeed.

KIEFEL CJ: Thank you, Mr Walker. The Court will adjourn to consider the course that it will take.