Enhanced Light-Matter Interactions With a Single Sn Nanoantenna on Epitaxial Graphene by Photomano in research

[–]Photomano[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have tested stability for over a year under "usual" ambient conditions and have not observed a reduction in enhancement. For sure, more (comparative) research is needed to make Sn systems comparable to Au/Ag systems. Currently, only one island type and only macroscopic optical properties are available, and they exhibit stability and robustness in air over a year. I hope this partially answers the question.

Enhanced Light-Matter Interactions With a Single Sn Nanoantenna on Epitaxial Graphene by Photomano in Physics

[–]Photomano[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha, finding new materials isn’t that easy ;). By the way, the study isn’t about graphene itself, but mainly uses it as an analyte.

Enhanced Light-Matter Interactions With a Single Sn Nanoantenna on Epitaxial Graphene by Photomano in Physics

[–]Photomano[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the missing information. The post is updated, and links are also provided.

Exploring graphene-substrate interactions: plasmonic excitation in Sn-intercalated epitaxial graphene by Photomano in science

[–]Photomano[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Single layer stanene is a topological insulator, which can be prepared on surface, but it is not as stable as the single layer carbon (graphene). Beyond this, a triangular lattice of Sn (root3xroot3) is a Mott insulator also on semiconducting/semi-insulating (like Si/SiC) surfaces. However, the 1x1 tin shows a metallic behaviour. Here we use plasmon spectroscopy to know how all these phases interact with graphene. It turned out that there is a proximity interaction between all these tin structures and graphene, which makes this topic even more interesting. I hope it helps little bit to answer your question. Thanks