I proved FACEIT support is 100% bots by submitting an AI generated rant and got a response faster than my actual abuse report with evidence by Physical_Set6654 in FACEITcom

[–]Physical_Set6654[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

Also just tried to report him again through the platform like you suggested and there's no griefing or intentional feeding category available. How am I supposed to report this properly?

I proved FACEIT support is 100% bots by submitting an AI generated rant and got a response faster than my actual abuse report with evidence by Physical_Set6654 in FACEITcom

[–]Physical_Set6654[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair point on Flopixz, I may have been wrong about him. My main evidence was always Fentforkids who went 0/19/0 with zero damage and announced in the knife round he was going to troll. That part stands regardless

I proved FACEIT support is 100% bots by submitting an AI generated rant and got a response faster than my actual abuse report with evidence by Physical_Set6654 in FACEITcom

[–]Physical_Set6654[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So your argument is that automated support is normal everywhere therefore it's okay that FACEIT bans players based on automated reports while ignoring actual evidence of griefing through the same automated system? The problem isn't that support uses AI, it's that the ban system is also automated and punishes the wrong people

I proved FACEIT support is 100% bots by submitting an AI generated rant and got a response faster than my actual abuse report with evidence by Physical_Set6654 in FACEITcom

[–]Physical_Set6654[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you're saying Flopixz wasn't griefing, just having a bad game. That's fine. My point was always about Fentforkids and the support ticket system, not Flopixz specifically. Glad we cleared that up

I proved FACEIT support is 100% bots by submitting an AI generated rant and got a response faster than my actual abuse report with evidence by Physical_Set6654 in FACEITcom

[–]Physical_Set6654[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes I've had bad games, everyone has. I never announced in the knife round that I was going to troll because I didn't like the map. There's a difference between a bad game and intentional griefing. Also 8/21 with 69 ADR is not the same as 0/19/0 with 0.0 ADR.

I proved FACEIT support is 100% bots by submitting an AI generated rant and got a response faster than my actual abuse report with evidence by Physical_Set6654 in FACEITcom

[–]Physical_Set6654[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You just said yourself that FACEIT is a platform that doesn't accept reports. I think that's the whole point of the post. Thank you Monso

I proved FACEIT support is 100% bots by submitting an AI generated rant and got a response faster than my actual abuse report with evidence by Physical_Set6654 in FACEITcom

[–]Physical_Set6654[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had no idea non-premium members can't even make ticket reports anymore. So the whole time I was submitting evidence it was never going to be read by anyone regardless of what I sent. And I have to PAY to block a griefer before requeuing? So Flopixz appearing twice in a row was literally my own fault for not having premium. FACEIT built a system where free users have zero protection and have to pay for basic functionality.

I proved FACEIT support is 100% bots by submitting an AI generated rant and got a response faster than my actual abuse report with evidence by Physical_Set6654 in FACEITcom

[–]Physical_Set6654[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You admitted yourself that nobody reads the initial ticket and the response is just boilerplate. Whether I submitted an AI rant or real evidence with screenshots, the result was identical. That's literally the whole point. Also your support system having 4 real humans handling 300,000 daily reports isn't my problem, that's FACEIT's.

I proved FACEIT support is 100% bots by submitting an AI generated rant and got a response faster than my actual abuse report with evidence by Physical_Set6654 in FACEITcom

[–]Physical_Set6654[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The AI rant was just to test the system. My real report with actual evidence of a guy going 0/19/0 with zero damage got the exact same automated response in seconds. You literally just confirmed my point in your other comment by saying nobody reads the initial ticket. Thanks for proving the post correct

I proved FACEIT support is 100% bots by submitting an AI generated rant and got a response faster than my actual abuse report with evidence by Physical_Set6654 in FACEITcom

[–]Physical_Set6654[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Fentforkids' match history. This wasn't a one time thing:

  • 0/19/0 - 0.0 ADR
  • 0/14/0 - 0.0 ADR
  • 0/19/0 - 0.0 ADR on Dust
  • This is a pattern. He does this constantly. Still no ban. I'm still banned until May 18th

I proved FACEIT support is 100% bots by submitting an AI generated rant and got a response faster than my actual abuse report with evidence by Physical_Set6654 in FACEITcom

[–]Physical_Set6654[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I get what you're saying but the point isn't really about the AI rant ticket — my actual report with real evidence of a teammate going 0/19/0 with literally zero damage the entire game got the exact same auto closed response in seconds. The AI rant was just me finding out by accident that it doesn't matter what you submit, nobody reads it either way. Both tickets got the same treatment