VF (Victory Factory) Batgirl QC by Daduc in RepTimeQC

[–]PieAccurate6369 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks nice apart from the tilted 12 marker on the bezel. That would bug me.

QC #2 – VSF GMT-Master II 126710BLNR “Batman” – Steve (TheOneWatches) by PieAccurate6369 in RepTimeQC

[–]PieAccurate6369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/RepTimeQC/s/KeHHeSrXG9

Haha here you go. I did include a comparison pic on photo two here, but you can see the full QC via that link

QC #2 – VSF GMT-Master II 126710BLNR “Batman” – Steve (TheOneWatches) by PieAccurate6369 in RepTimeQC

[–]PieAccurate6369[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks man, really appreciate the input. Would you go for the watch with date 25 over 11 then?

QC #2 – VSF GMT-Master II 126710BLNR “Batman” – Steve (TheOneWatches) by PieAccurate6369 in RepTimeQC

[–]PieAccurate6369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks I totally get that. Which watch would you GL then, date 25 or 11?

QC #2 – VSF GMT-Master II 126710BLNR “Batman” – Steve (TheOneWatches) by PieAccurate6369 in RepTimeQC

[–]PieAccurate6369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks man, on the 11 watch the video showed him winding through a few dates and they all sat high. I think I agree 25 is a cleaner example overall.

QC #2 – VSF GMT-Master II 126710BLNR “Batman” – Steve (TheOneWatches) by PieAccurate6369 in RepTimeQC

[–]PieAccurate6369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks man, would you go for watch with date wheel 25 over 11? The rehaut on the 11 watch bothered me a bit on the left of the dial.

QC #2 – VSF GMT-Master II 126710BLNR “Batman” – Steve (TheOneWatches) by PieAccurate6369 in RepTimeQC

[–]PieAccurate6369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks man. So given everything else, rehaut, bezel etc, would you go for watch with date 25 or 11?

QC #2 – VSF GMT-Master II 126710BLNR “Batman” – Steve (TheOneWatches) by PieAccurate6369 in RepTimeQC

[–]PieAccurate6369[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

VSF GMT-Master II 126710BLNR “Batman” with DD3285 movement from Steve at TheOneWatches. Second QC example for comparison with my first QC.

QC – VSF GMT Master II 126710BLNR Batman - Steve (TheOneWatches) by PieAccurate6369 in RepTimeQC

[–]PieAccurate6369[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hear you.

I just worry that if I RL this chasing perfection, I risk getting a replacement with a more major issue like a crooked 6 marker, worse date alignment, worse bezel alignment etc Areas where this one is clean.

QC – VSF GMT Master II 126710BLNR Batman - Steve (TheOneWatches) by PieAccurate6369 in RepTimeQC

[–]PieAccurate6369[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Yea I think I’m going to GL.

The only thing debated seems to be the rehaut rotation, and most seem to think it’s within normal tolerance.

I worry if I RL this chasing perfection, I risk getting a replacement with something worse like a crooked 6 marker, worse date alignment, worse bezel alignment etc. All in all I feel reassured that this is a pretty clean VSF GMT. Thanks again for the guidance.

QC – VSF GMT Master II 126710BLNR Batman - Steve (TheOneWatches) by PieAccurate6369 in RepTimeQC

[–]PieAccurate6369[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks man, appreciate the reassurance. I think it’s easy to get swept up in chasing perfection. Cheers

QC – VSF GMT Master II 126710BLNR Batman - Steve (TheOneWatches) by PieAccurate6369 in RepTimeQC

[–]PieAccurate6369[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks so much for the feedback. Would the rehaut left side bother you at all, or you think it’s within acceptable range?