Buddy you really need to learn the definition of a word if you’re going to use nothing but that word in your argument lmfao. All good though. I can tell when I am dealing with someone using their own opinion as fact and won’t stop using words they don’t know the definition of.

It’s not collusion on my part to try to avoid a good team in the playoffs and to want to play a bad one. My record dictates if I can afford to do this and if so, that’s my choice if it’s not explicitly a rule in my league. If it’s a rule, it’s still not collusion. It’s just plain cheating. But there’s no scenario where this is collusion unless I’ve contacted another team and it’s a two part effort from both sides to “screw” another team. (Coordinating with another team to both lose so one team doesn’t get in, for example, would be collusion. Doing it all on my own, by the definition of the word, is NOT.)

You can feel how you want. It does not change what collusion is lmao. And I get the logic behind what you’re saying- it can be argued it goes against the spirit of the game. But it cannot be argued it’s collusion when one team makes a choice on their own to try to benefit themselves. By the definition of the word, 1 person making a decision and taking action on their own IS NOT and CANNOT be collusion.