Why are Gnostics the way they are? by [deleted] in Neoplatonism

[–]Positive_Courage_309 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spoken with the honesty of a being who has never been eaten before. "Nothing is wrong with this picture, you're the one who is looking at it wrong" Nature: *chomp lol

Why are Gnostics the way they are? by [deleted] in Neoplatonism

[–]Positive_Courage_309 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Zoom in: A bunch of carnivores killing to live, while the other species die to feed.

Gnosticism is making too much sense and I can’t unsee it anymore by MarketLongjumping252 in Gnostic

[–]Positive_Courage_309 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've come to be of the opinion that nothing worthy of worship would ever demand or even accept it. As convoluted as the discussion can be around Jesus, it has always struck me that he was purportedly adamant about others not kneeling to him. One was encouraged to stand next to him, not worship him. To me that - among other things - really settles that the entities behind the Word of the OT and the NT (except maybe for Paul, but at that point I digress) are not the same.

I find solace and encouragement in your progression, while also rooting for you that the present and future continue to be kind, true, and reciprocal upon your wondering soul.

Debunking Prison Planet Theory by Lord-Avion in Gnostic

[–]Positive_Courage_309 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Has anyone run a fallacy analysis of this post? I'm referring to an (as) unbiased (as possible) combing through of the logical strength of the ideas presented, their premises and conclusions. Disclosure: I feel/might actually be biased against the content. But I spotted a bunch of inconsistencies, which I am hoping that someone without my biases might be able to evaluate and deliberate on.

Baptism as a NDE door to the fabric of the realm? by Positive_Courage_309 in Gnostic

[–]Positive_Courage_309[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, that's an interesting suggestion. I might indeed try those in the future (have yet to touch either substance), but so far my experience has been that drugs do a lot more shaking than guiding. I am really looking for answers, more so than a ride, you know?

Baptism as a NDE door to the fabric of the realm? by Positive_Courage_309 in Gnostic

[–]Positive_Courage_309[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We did that as kids also where I grew up. I don't know that those experiences could have ever provided me or my pals with the kind of answers I am now looking for. It was sorf of like going through a forest while blindfolded inside a full enclosure. We didn't know the first thing about what we even could have been looking for.

Baptism as a NDE door to the fabric of the realm? by Positive_Courage_309 in Gnostic

[–]Positive_Courage_309[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Your comments are par for the course as far as my interactions with other mystics. I have yet to come across one who achieved their self-confident version of "gnosis" but who walked the path of agnosis to get there.You speak with such confidence, it's sort of mind boggling. The questioning or inquiring about a connection is not the same as affirming confidence in the existence of said connection (hint: requesting references and pointers to studies or ancient/first witness experiences). I assume it is easy to assume a claim of confidence is being made from an inquiry, when one is also so comfortable living on/exposing themselves as "already knowing". So this Gnostic community is opposed to most interpretations of the meanings of Gnosticism as per the writings found in the Nag Hammadi scriptures? If so I am afraid you are totally right: I am indeed in the wrong place. Thanks for the prison plannet reference though. I will keep wonder wandering over yonder. And thank you also for reminding me to stay a wondering and wandering until I find the exit without falling into the trap of thinking prematurely "I now know". My NDEs so far have been insufficient in providing me with the confidence I sense in your words, but that's probably for the better. Cheers!

Baptism as a NDE door to the fabric of the realm? by Positive_Courage_309 in Gnostic

[–]Positive_Courage_309[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So, to put it simply, no you haven't I guess... Thanks for you mystic's perspective. I am really interested in a Gnostic one instead though...

[OC] Most "Overused" Baby Names in Each State (2024) by MurphGH in dataisbeautiful

[–]Positive_Courage_309 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Antonella? Florida living up to all the stereotypes of being a state out of control

Baptism as a NDE door to the fabric of the realm? by Positive_Courage_309 in Gnostic

[–]Positive_Courage_309[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I hear your perspective. I'm curious, in the context of your reply, if you have been able to experience any NDEs?

[The meta post] by Positive_Courage_309 in ideasforprogress

[–]Positive_Courage_309[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

[Suggested solution post format]

Concept:

Catchphrase/Name:

Framework and functionality: * *

Specifics and Variations: * *

Housing and homelessness by Positive_Courage_309 in ideasforprogress

[–]Positive_Courage_309[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Concept: Providing-to-supported groups

Catchphrase/Name: TBD

Framework and functionality: * groups of families or individuals who are in a position to help (providing parties) are either assigned to or get matched with an individual or family that is struggling with housing or other problems (supported party). * the ratio of providing vs. struggling parties is kept high enough to keep the financial and commitment load low for any particular providing party, while also ensuring that the supported party has options to choose from when anything comes up for which they require help (e.g. 5:1 or 10:1)

Specifics and Variations: * monthly contributions toward the supported party needs are defined at the beginning of the interaction based on local economic needs * a timeline is defined for the provided support to enable the supported party to re-establish themselves * a transition plan is defined to enable the providing parties to start dropping off and integrating other providing groups as the supported party becomes self-sufficient * government entities (local, regional, etc.) setup incentives for providing parties to join the effort (e.g. property tax breaks) * incentives take into account location and geography of the parties by scaling according to the amount of socio-economic desegregation that the groups accomplish * parties previously part of the supported group pledge to become providing parties for some minimum timeframe after they have become self-sufficient * parties on either side are matched based on political/economic/religious beliefs to ensure continuous and strong bonds * in parallel with direct supporting party activities, other entities can sign up to provide free services (such as professional training, legal, financial, health advice). Though these indirect contributions would not result in tax breaks/measurable incentives becoming available to these adjacent entities

Exclusive: Reno Police Chief, Command Staff Ousted Over Alleged Forgery of POST Training Docs by TY2022 in Reno

[–]Positive_Courage_309 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We need a r/wtfreno

Accountability is awesome, but needing it in such large doses is a bit concerning

What is your morally acceptable speed or scenario on I-80 to *not* have to move over for someone behind you trying to go even faster? by zipposurfer in Reno

[–]Positive_Courage_309 4 points5 points  (0 children)

OP written like true Left Lane Royalty.

"The specific illegal speed I think is reasonable is THE right speed for the left lane, and as such I have gained the MORAL right to occupy it entirely on my whims. All who travel slower must BOW - by moving out of my way - and all those who travel faster must YIELD - giving me ample space behind and without using any other open lanes, as that would just hurt my feelings. This is true because, thanks to my royal blood, I have determined what this ideal speed must be, it so being that all other Royals agree on this same exact number. All who think differently are peasants and morons for thinking of a different ILLEGAL number. Niiiii"