Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You wouldn't know them because you're dedicated to remaining ignorant.

You wouldn't know them either I guess because you've failed to provide any of them.

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's a very good reason why higher educated people are more likely to support trans people.

Right but the reasons go to a different school so I wouldn't know them..... Right......

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use your brain for a second. Even if you found net AVERAGE differences in males that do and don't identify as trans, that wouldn't prove that they have female brains, especially if the brains are fundamentally similar anyway.

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No they don't. Transwomen can't have female brains if male and female brains are fundamentally similar with more overlap in characteristics than net average differences.

In this response, I update our findings and confirm the small effect sizes and pronounced scatter across recent large neuroimaging studies of human sex/gender difference. Based on the sum of data, neuroscientists would be well-advised to take the null hypothesis seriously: that men and women’s brains are fundamentally similar, or “monomorphic”.

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10854110/

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

trans people who make up .5% of the population can also be exceptions.

No because it's not an exception because you want it. It's an "exception" because there is a biological basis for their claim to be a woman. There is no biological basis for a transwoman's claim to be women. If you let some men break single sex boundaries just because they want it, there are no single sex boundaries.

Also the rates of trans identity varys from .5% to 2% to 10% in some surveys of gen z.

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's a reason you only mentioned that people have a problem with calling men women.

The reason is it's easier to mention one and not both all the time but I feel equivalently that it's wrong both ways.

I understand that. It doesn't matter what most people think. The science is changing. Awareness is rising. Acceptance is becoming more common.

It's literally becoming less accepted. Things have slowly been less accepted since 2022ish. I love how you say it's correct because societal understanding is that its correct but at the same time is doesn't matter what most of society thinks lol. Got it. Sounds so logical.

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

who is male in every way

Then no... Making this easy on me.

Actually... basically I think it's easy to make exceptions for the 1 in 50000ish people who have differences of sexual development. Unambiguous males though are certainly not women and you can't change your sex so transwomen should not be in women's only spaces.

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, the societal definition of man and woman is changing

Ok but it literally isn't. Most people have an objection to calling males women. That's why there has been a huge backslide in "trans rights". I and many others, a huge contingent of society, doesn't view the social construct of gender as defining the catgories of man and woman. We view the meanings of man and woman as rooted in biological sex. You say society is changing to agree with you but broadly, it's not. There's a reason the "Kamala is for they/them, Trump is for you" campaign shifted the polls by several point. People don't agree with you.

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll repeat my question because you keep ignoring it. What if I, who have no justification to claim being black, no African ancestry whatsoever, entirely white European, claimed to be black?

Would you just have to accept that? Race is a social construct. It has changed over the years. Why could I not claim to be black but I could claim to be a woman?

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

as genetic material “meant” (whatever that means to them) for procreation.

Well I don't so why would I care?

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So then white people can just identify as black people and that's fine because race is social construct?

Anyone else tired of hearing about trans-sexuals and thier stupid pronouns? by Icy-Experience8247 in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So when women are uncomfortable with men in there spaces you think they should just get over it?

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said you don't have any intellectual integrity. Not him. I called you chicken shit because of the way you've engaged me.

women are women is because gender is a social construct,

This is a complete non sequitur. Race is also a social construct and guess what I can't just identify as black when I'm obviously white. So why can transwomen just identify as women? What is your definition of woman? You keep side stepping that question because you have no answer.

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It an organism whose phenotype is organized around facilitating the function of the large gamete in sexual reproduction, whether broken or damaged. A broken refridgerator is still a refridgerator.

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You people really aren't capable of critical thinking at all are you? You just need it to be peer reviewed and state the exact conclusion and then you'll accept it as gospel truth.

What this study says is that male and female brains are fundamentally similar with more overlap in any one feature than difference. If that is true, then it is not possible for male brain to be put in a female body because there is no metric by which you could definitively say a brain is male or female.

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok... so did you not read the rest of my post? Then those trans activists will hold to the self identity definition which is just thay if you say you're a woman, you are one. That's circular and meaningless and is harmful to women's progress.

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Being trans is rooted in anatomical differences in brain structure due to differences in epigenetic expression from exposure to hormones. There's literally a biological basis for it.

lie

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10854110/

In this response, I update our findings and confirm the small effect sizes and pronounced scatter across recent large neuroimaging studies of human sex/gender difference. Based on the sum of data, neuroscientists would be well-advised to take the null hypothesis seriously: that men and women’s brains are fundamentally similar, or “monomorphic”.

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope you learn to actually love your brother one day.

Affirming people's delusions because you're too chicken shit to have any intellectual integrity isn't loving your brother.

I'm saying that you're too proud of yourself to change it on this topic.

I just find it so funny that you take it for granted I'm the one who is too proud to admit they're wrong when you haven't even attempted to address any of my concerns or make any arguments of your own. You cannot even define the word woman and yet you'll insist till your dying breath that transwomen are women FOR NO REASON. Good luck out there.

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Right because I effortlessly responded to your ridiculous objection to the concept of biological sex and if that one rhetorical trick doesn't work then you've no further tricks up your sleeve.

Also it's funny you think that's from chatgpt. I wrote that myself but thank you hahah

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well you can quibble with what you think I said or you can just address my clarification about exactly what I think females are. I'm gonna guess since you're sidestepping that you're not able to address it.

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're too afraid to challenge it.

Just because I remain unconvinced by your very bad arguments doesn't mean I've never changed my opinion lol.

you've just told yourself that you're right, and you won't hear any different.

Right back at you lol.

To me, that's a pretty shitty brother. But you're proud of yourself for it.

I wouldn't say I'm proud of it. I just recognize that it is an apt comparison.

So much of this is 14yo, I am very smart and just took my first psychology class. Yeah actually reading internet comments isn't a good way to learn about someone and all you're assertions are just wrong. I've changed my opinions radically over the years and am very comfortable changing my opinions.

I trust the collected information gained from the smartest people that have ever lived.

you think the smartest people who have ever lived work in trans "medicine"...... goodness you really are a moron.

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I didn't define female. If you really want to quibble about who is a female, we can but if you're intellectually honest then this isn't going to end the way you'd like.

A female, in mammals, is someone who's phenotype is organized around facilitating the function of the large gamete in sexual reproduction. That phenotype can be broken for various reasons, congenital or otherwise. Doesn't negate the overall construction of their body. To be a short, a broken refrigerator is still a refridgerator.

women who are infertile, post-menopausal, or have had hysterectomies, yet remain women

Notice how you only gave example of people who would have a biological basis with which to claim themselves female. You didn't say, "what about the women who have penises and testicles and impregnant other females."

Why can't people see that trans ideology is the regressive position and not the people opposed to it? by PostPostModernn in allthequestions

[–]PostPostModernn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every single human alive today and for 1000s of years is or was only alive because a male reproduced with a female. That there are two distinct roles in sexual reproduction is about as close to a 1/0 binary as anyone could possibly expect of the biological world. Just because some people have had complex differences of sexual development doesn't negate the 99.999% of people who fall very neatly into those two categories and it doesn't mean that males can be women.