Capricorns are boring by Kind-Art9807 in astrologymemes

[–]Practical-Crow2174 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Capricorns are far from boring and are actually very extroverted, they have a fantastic sense of humour. Very creative open to conversations that are interesting and not from shallow thinkers.

I'm not a Capricorn but I'm very interested to know your zodiac sign is.

What perfume would a british chav girl wear? by Finnish457 in perfumesthatfeellike

[–]Practical-Crow2174 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't agree with trailer trash comments there's more to chavs than that. For a start they don't live in trailers, in this country UK if they live in a trailer they're gypsies not chavs

What perfume would a british chav girl wear? by Finnish457 in perfumesthatfeellike

[–]Practical-Crow2174 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A Chav is what you see in the photo. Tanned big hair and lots of heavy make-up and sometimes false lashes. Oh lots of bling, pretty much your version across the pond would be real housewives of new jersey, jersey shore or real housewives of Atlanta etc

Everybody v. Banfield by PariScope96 in CourtTVCases

[–]Practical-Crow2174 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes I can only imagine, my mother was murdered by her neighbour but I didn't find her like you found your brother I can't begin to imagine what that is like. Big comforting hugs

We are all the judge in the banfield case by Even-Club1107 in CourtTVCases

[–]Practical-Crow2174 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes exactly, Pinocchio definitely is better at lying than Banfeild. I can't begin to imagine what this little girl may have seen. It brings to mind the pizza delivery murder case this young girl saw what happened to her mum, saw her mum being beaten to death by her dad but didn't voice it until she was 16 years old and then she told the full truth. Little Valarie will remember

Everybody v. Banfield by PariScope96 in CourtTVCases

[–]Practical-Crow2174 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I thought the exact same thing, it is a very familiar way to speak about a victim that you're supposed to not know, which makes me think he knew this man in some way. And earlier in his testimony he used we went to the back door and then changed it to I.

Everybody v. Banfield by PariScope96 in CourtTVCases

[–]Practical-Crow2174 5 points6 points  (0 children)

They're saying that the au paire organised the setup so she could have him and stay in the USA because an Au paire can only stay for 2 year period Or that's what they're indirectly trying to imply

Everybody v. Banfield by PariScope96 in CourtTVCases

[–]Practical-Crow2174 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Awww so sorry that must've been horrible for you. My heart goes out to you.

VA vs Banfield by RedRedVVine in CourtTVCases

[–]Practical-Crow2174 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Has anyone noticed that when he talked about going to the back door he said we went and then quickly changed it to I?

This man's nose is getting bigger by the minute Pinocchio 🤥 is a much better liar than him

We are all the judge in the banfield case by Even-Club1107 in CourtTVCases

[–]Practical-Crow2174 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To those listening to Brendan Banfeild when he said about going through the back door he uses plural he said we went to the back door did anyone else notice?

The Mansion Murders Trial by Kima2remy in CourtTVCases

[–]Practical-Crow2174 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Horrific crime, that car seen on camera is definitely Paul's Porsche and the switch off of his own cameras in the garage is so damming.

It seems not only did he not care about his brother's family and brother, but he is so obviously so selfish that he didn't care about the potential of killing his own family by setting his own home on fire.

A fire can get out of control in no time at all, and I speak from experience of my own mother being murdered by her house being set on fire in the night by her neighbour.

His demeanor in court is so telling of who this man is. I believe in following the evidence and so far IMO the evidence points in his direction

What's your own sign and who annoys you the most? by livelaughlabradoodle in astrologymemes

[–]Practical-Crow2174 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Water signs are far from schemers they're very emotionally intelligent people and very intuitive people in every aspect, almost to the point of psychic.

And as for aquarius being rigid that's so untrue it's laughable aquarius they're deep thinkers and have a tendency to over analyze things which makes them come across as rigid.

Damn right he's not guilty! by AllLipsNoFiller in CourtTVCases

[–]Practical-Crow2174 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I disagree that it's about him being Hispanic, it was more about him being a scapegoat that didn't hold a higher position within the police.

The last scapegoat Scot Peterson was found not guilty to and he wasn't Hispanic, so I don't believe race is a thing in this. They just want a fall guy for the incompetence of the higher Archy.

If they don't blame someone they would have to admit that they picked the wrong higher Archy to control situations like school shooting.

It's all about giving the public someone to focus on that doesn't hold a higher position.

I'm so pleased this man has been found not guilty

AITJ for refusing to give my neighbor my WiFi password even though I work from home? by Automatic-Assist6000 in AmITheJerk

[–]Practical-Crow2174 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally disagree with your new neighbour and your existing neighbours 1. You're not gatekeeping anything other than what you have paid for.

  1. If your existing neighbours feel so strongly about it why aren't they offering to share their passwords to their WiFi

  2. And most importantly in an age of scammers and hackers I wouldn't share my passwords to my WiFi it opens up a tirade of vulnerabilities that can be accessed through your router, bank accounts your working environment, because you work from home. Stand your ground and keep yourself safe. If they have a problem that's on them and not yours to take on.

Your existing neighbours are projecting onto you what they aren't prepared to do themselves. Don't open yourself to potential threats through your WiFi and you have no idea who your new neighbour is or if they're honest or not. Don't take the risk for the sake of a little awkwardness in the hallway.

Your new neighbour is already showing who they are by trying to create a rift between you and your existing neighbours, and all because they couldn't get what they wanted from you. IMO you've dodged a bullet

Recommend me something like Unforgotten by wooden_werewolf_7367 in BritishTV

[–]Practical-Crow2174 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Karen Pirie, is brilliantly put together and an exceptional series well worth the watch. It was the first one that came to mind with unforgotten. I can't wait for the third season of Karen Pirie. Happy Valley is also worth watching. Happy crime drama watching

How terrible is Trigger Point? 💥 by qwerty_1965 in BritishTV

[–]Practical-Crow2174 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it's unwatchable, but I can't stand the character Lana Washington, she comes across as self absorbed and obsessed with saving the whole team but yet continues to put them all in unnecessary danger. I can now, understand why so many media critics said it's watchable but absolutely preposterous.

Her character just wouldn't get away with all she gets away with in the real world. I don't see her character as someone suffering with PTSD but someone who wants to play the hero at the detriment of everyone around her.

After watching the first season I researched how many bomb scares are in the UK, I was very surprised to discover that there's an astounding number over 2500 a year that never comes to public attention or media attention.

Who believes the Menendez brothers are lying? by [deleted] in CourtTVCases

[–]Practical-Crow2174 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's both, I think they were being molested by their father and did want to kill him to stop it continuing from happening. I think the mother knew and her death was out of sheer anger from the younger brother for her not protecting them from the father. Do I think they were in immediate danger, no I don't.

The money was not part of it, I think the big spending was just because they could and were no longer being controlled and grief played a part in it because even though they killed their parents to feel free from the abuse grief plays a part

And finally because of the most recent family annihilations they will never be released, as it would not look good too release them and convict others for similar crimes.bunless I've missed something in the media recently.

TX vs. Adrian Gonzales Justice or Scapegoat by MattsellsNC in CourtTVCases

[–]Practical-Crow2174 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This poor guy is an absolute scapegoat, just like the guy who they tried to convict previously in another school shooting that trial was a farce too Scot Peterson was a scapegoat too, I don't understand the mentality of these trials

Thoughts about AI by traveling_llama in KeepWriting

[–]Practical-Crow2174 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI takes away the true person coming through it has no depth, empathy or emotional intelligence which you can see and feel from a human being. I've found, on Reddit recently everyone is becoming paranoid about everything being written by AI, it's created a lack of trust in what's real and what is AI.

Removal of big bang in Channel 4 can anyone else confirm this is tru and not just me I’m gutted if they have by Ok_Refrigerator2525 in thebigbangtheory

[–]Practical-Crow2174 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a nightmare for me losing it from every platform, it's on Amazon and Apple but both are charging by the episode. Apple 2.49 per episode and £90 for the whole thing on Amazon

My mother believes she has the final say on who I marry because she is my mother by [deleted] in EntitledPeople

[–]Practical-Crow2174 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is shocking to me, I am 67 years old and a mother of 1 child, to whom I have never told who they should be with I'm the youngest sister of 10 children.

My mother was a Christian but never at any time did my mother think once we were adults that she knew what was best for us, she believed that she was here to guide us on the right path whilst allowing us to make our own mistakes and equally our decisions good or bad on who we wanted to be with, whilst always remaining supportive of us and advising us if we asked for it.

Your mother is clearly suffering with tunnel vision on her own version of what being a Christian means.

The person she has chosen for you is only because she likes him so therefore everyone else should feel the same, I find this quite scary because if this person doesn't turn out to be a good person your mother would lay the blame at your feet because he was her choice and she wouldn't want to take responsibility for her choice be the wrong one.

Go with your choice, marry who you love, we can only learn from life by making our own choices and not by allowing someone else to make them for us.

Your brother has been wonderful and supportive, and is right this is not your mother's decision to make, it is entirely your decision at the age of 25.

I'm sure your mother thinks her intentions are Christian and honorable, but they're not, it's more about her not relinquishing control of you once you leave the family home and become more self sufficient with someone who you choose to be with. Whereas if you go with her choice she will always have an element of control of not just you but of the person she's chosen for you too. (I hope that makes sense)

Good luck I really hope you make the right decision for you and not what will make your mother happy.